doubt quota throat tree

[Domenapoletano]

Hi, guys. the two outer gorges are for the threaded tang
while the interior, it is to better accommodate a seeger ring.
the doubt is, with the preceding rule, I would have quoted writing throat uni 4386 for the central one and throat uni iso 4755 for rquelle two external.
But now how do they share? Do I have to quote the beginning of the throat, starting from the beginning of the tree and the diameter of the throat itself?

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

but rotate the design and make it more legible you can not? And yet I had already reported it to you.
how to quote a gorge of seeger is a topic already widely discussed in the forum

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

however a question arises spontaneously looking from previous discussion your exercise; but do you know what a seeger is and what it is for? already from your highlighted lines you would say no...
I think you have a lot of confusion.
You don't know what a seeger is
you can't distinguish an unloading gala for grinding from a threaded exhaust throat and that neither of them at nothing to do with a seeger.

I suggest you buy a good book of mechanical technology

 

[Domenapoletano]

however a question arises spontaneously looking from previous discussion your exercise; but do you know what a seeger is and what it is for? already from your highlighted lines you would say no...

is a safety ring that avoids the axial shift of the other elements, so in the specific case of the belt. Am I right?
because those masses before the dice are simple rosettes, from how I interpreted the asses.
Thanks massive. next time I rectify the orientation of the photo.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

is a safety ring that avoids the axial shift of the other elements, so in the specific case of the belt. Am I right?

Yes.
first of all because if a seeger prevents axial shift there is no reason that there is also a nut as the locking would be redundant; This means that if a nut is present it cannot be a locking ring, also called seeger.
then if it were a seeger would have been graphically represented as the seeger is a circular element that is dissected, moreover in the design would be represented the throat.
Finally proportionally if I looked at the tables of seegers, which are always bound to the diameter of the trees, you would have seen that visually those represented cannot be.

as regards the two norms cited, in a completely fortuitous manner the second, you have adjusted them. for their size just do a search on the network to find dozens of dispenses bearing the size. or consult a school technology book or vademecum baldassini.
in a technical design it is always preferable to avoid indicating the regulations by delegating to the operator the task of obtaining the measurements, for several reasons: a operator rarely has the time to consult manuals or dispensers to extrapolate the measures, an operator acts in a more difficult environment of a technical office lindo, an operator could be very good to use the machine and to detect the measures, but unable to read a unified table and above all a non-component operator.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

so much to show you how a seeger would look in the design of an overall

ANELLI D'ARRESTO : Calcoli di montaggio per gli anelli Seeger - Gandini Fasteners

www.gandini.it

 

[Domenapoletano]

so much to show you how a seeger would look in the design of an overall

ANELLI D'ARRESTO : Calcoli di montaggio per gli anelli Seeger - Gandini Fasteners

www.gandini.it

View attachment 67279

then, that blackness on the tree line, (refer to the design axieme) after the seeger(which corresponds to the baloon 19), can I consider it as a fitting radius? and maybe the ring in question is beveled to look better at the shoulder?
or does this reasoning make no sense?
Thank you. I realize I still have a lot to understand and learn. Thank you very much

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

As on that part of the tree are assembled of the pulleys mon it is necessary a grinding process and therefore it does not need the throat, that dark line you see is the bevel of the tree, there will certainly be a ray, but it is "hidden" from the rosette (the position 19). the ray on the tree will surely be there because it is necessary to eliminate areas subject to breakage and if there is a ray means that the rosette will have proper bevels.