doubt

[PiegatoreSolidworks]

- premise n°1: I created everything together only to realize the bracket that serves me and to practice me.. . .

- premise n°2: I don't understand anything about it too because it's the first time I do something like this!

problem: How come when I open the Persian hook is crossed like a ghost without colliding? to see the operation I have to animate everything?

Thank you.

 

[michele81]

in general to evaluate collisions it is sufficient to use the command moves, activating "identifying collisions"

 

[PiegatoreSolidworks]

in general to evaluate collisions it is sufficient to use the command moves, activating "identifying collisions"

I know this but without using that command the clamp is passed. . .

 

[meccanicamg]

in the environment together, always and in any case every body is passed, incorporated, crossed by what is not directly bound with the body or bodies moving. only with the activation of indentifying collisions or only in the animation modules with physical simulation (where I can put contacts and gravity) I can make the bodies interact as in reality.
is so with all 3d software

 

[PiegatoreSolidworks]

in the environment together, always and in any case every body is passed, incorporated, crossed by what is not directly bound with the body or bodies moving. only with the activation of indentifying collisions or only in the animation modules with physical simulation (where I can put contacts and gravity) I can make the bodies interact as in reality.
is so with all 3d software

I tried that too, but it gives me an error message. surely the Persian touches down and up to the door compartment. After I try to change the measurements and I verify.

Thank you and excuse my ignorance! :frown:

 

[meccanicamg]

I tried that too, but it gives me an error message. surely the Persian touches down and up to the door compartment. After I try to change the measurements and I verify.

Thank you and excuse my ignorance! :frown:

You don't have to apologize. none of us have complete knowledge of everything. Then we wouldn't be here if we knew everything.

 

[PiegatoreSolidworks]

...incertainly gives me the error and deactivates my physical dynamics before moving the door....why? Where am I wrong?

 

[re_solidworks]

...incertainly gives me the error and deactivates my physical dynamics before moving the door....why? Where am I wrong?

Maybe there are some interference already at the start.

 

[PiegatoreSolidworks]

Maybe there are some interference already at the start.

What kind? there are 2 relationships of cardine with limited degrees. . .

 

[Mike1967]

What kind? there are 2 relationships of cardine with limited degrees. . .

... there are some components with "on-site" couplings, also the anta
touch the floor... Not the best.
try to suspend the door and only try the ceniera, if it still gives you error
is some coupling in the hinge.
try to suspend the repetition of components, sometimes relationships
Doubles go into conflict.
I noticed a zippered fin interconnection with the anta, it starts
eliminating those problems.
I'm sorry if I'm not accurate, I've seen your file in the office, I've only given it a sbriciatina and on this pc I don't have an active license, but I think it's me.
with the info I gave you solve.

Hello, Marco!
:smile:

ps: Here we are 18 days raining... I'm fun. . .

 

[PiegatoreSolidworks]

... there are some components with "on-site" couplings, also the anta
touch the floor... Not the best.
try to suspend the door and only try the ceniera, if it still gives you error
is some coupling in the hinge.
try to suspend the repetition of components, sometimes relationships
Doubles go into conflict.
I noticed a zippered fin interconnection with the anta, it starts
eliminating those problems.
I'm sorry if I'm not accurate, I've seen your file in the office, I've only given it a sbriciatina and on this pc I don't have an active license, but I think it's me.
with the info I gave you solve.

Hello, Marco!
:smile:

ps: Here we are 18 days raining... I'm fun. . .

in reality are things I have already corrected unfortunately...now place the new madello then I put myself on the guide to see if I solve... .

Thank you.

 

[PiegatoreSolidworks]

Here's another little test but that doesn't work... I don't know what fish to take! Well, I'll try again tomorrow. I'll be luckier, maybe!

 

[Mike1967]

Here's another little test but that doesn't work... I don't know what fish to take! Well, I'll try again tomorrow. I'll be luckier, maybe!

the problem lies in the coupling with limit angle. . .
I eliminated the limit angle in the "cardine" coupling and so it works.
in the next days I contact the assistance.
I attach the file tested with physical dynamics.

 

[PiegatoreSolidworks]

the problem lies in the coupling with limit angle. . .
I eliminated the limit angle in the "cardine" coupling and so it works.
in the next days I contact the assistance.
I attach the file tested with physical dynamics.

by curiosity I made a test with the old 2010 that I still have on, but the problem also exists there. It must be an old thing... .

Thank you for your help! :finger:

p.s. clearly also my Persian works without the limit to the 2 carriages!