• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

doubts about quotation of a radius of an industrial piece

  • Thread starter Thread starter DIEGO98GT2RS
  • Start date Start date

DIEGO98GT2RS

Guest
Good evening,
I don't understand how to quote this part of the following industrial piece... I tried with a reduced quotation and also for coordinates but without success:(
Thank you in advance for availability!
attached a photo of the curve to be quotedre414C67F0-EC78-4904-B6CE-3BC250273B94.webp
 
Last edited by a moderator:
is already listed. What is there to understand?
system side contour and quota lines can not be equal otherwise you do not understand anything. standards specify the technical design standard
 
is already listed. What is there to understand?
system side contour and quota lines can not be equal otherwise you do not understand anything. standards specify the technical design standard
When it comes to the thicknesses I already have all the layers ready, but the point is how to indicate precisely the point of the curve because so I don't know how it is realized.. .
 
When it comes to the thicknesses I already have all the layers ready, but the point is how to indicate precisely the point of the curve because so I don't know how it is realized.. .
I do not know how to quote precisely the crucible that tells me the center of the circle that is not tangent to the parts but bigger.. .
 
I do not know how to quote precisely the crucible that tells me the center of the circle that is not tangent to the parts but bigger.. .
However, my dilemma is whether you understand everything or not... (I made the quotation, that’s why I have doubts)

excuse the avalanche of messages in a row! and thank you again!
 
when it comes to the thicknesses I already have all the layers ready,
Then use them.
the point of the curve
His name is radius center
center of circle that is not tangent to the parts but bigger.. .
bigger what?
My dilemma is whether you understand everything or not
to understand if the drawing is clear you have to look at it internally.
However if you have to quote that center use the klinear quotas... Where's the problem?
 
Then use them.

His name is radius centerbigger what?

to understand if the drawing is clear you have to look at it internally.
However if you have to quote that center use the klinear quotas... Where's the problem?
All right, thank you and good day
 
to share a piece well means first of all to know how it is realized, with which instrumentation and technology, and to put itself in the shoes of those who realize it trying to find missing or wrong information.
personally more than quotating the radius center (we try to use the correct terms) I would quota the height and width of the processing.
there is also to say that a lather with experience often understands missing information but it is good to think that the piece should make it a child;)
 
to share a piece well means first of all to know how it is realized, with which instrumentation and technology, and to put itself in the shoes of those who realize it trying to find missing or wrong information.
personally more than quotating the radius center (we try to use the correct terms) I would quota the height and width of the processing.
there is also to say that a lather with experience often understands missing information but it is good to think that the piece should make it a child;)
perfect, very kind, thank you all!?
 
if it is a particular circular, the symbol of diameter should be placed on the diametral quotas
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top