doubts about table setting

[GiGa]

In general, 95% of the boards I asked for are in autocad... therefore, generally, use inventor for all stages except for the tables that are then processed in autocad... I never had to go through certain functions because I didn't need them. in this period (finally) require me some boards of a complex set for notes, sections and details and I am colliding with the differences between the two programs...
Meanwhile a couple of doubts:

• from a section (with depth of 1000mm) I collect a detail enlarged. from this detail I find a section that shows only the 1000mm of the depth of the initial section from which the detail itself was obtained... there is a way to unleash the depth and choose what to show?
• Is there a way to edit multiple treats simultaneously (like a copy-formed)?Thank you for any straight...

 

[stefanobruno]

No.
No.
....

 

[GiGa]

thank you for the prompt (and coincides) answer.... I ask vein for the delayed replica... In any case, after several "incomprehensions" with the software, I must eventually say that it is not so complicated... You just have to forget about many shortcuts that with the 2d make you go like a splinter, but that in the 3d you cannot apply. . .

 

[stefanobruno]

You just have to forget about many shortcuts that with the 2d make you go like a splinter, but that in the 3d you cannot apply. . .

That's right, the faster you are with autocad and the less the inventor's table (and I think of any other 3d) will seem friendly to you.
over time you will acquire a series of tricks that will help you to speed up even the harvests at the table, sure that before you review a ease of reuse of the boards as in autocad we should still wait for some releases.

 

[Tarkus]

thank you for the prompt (and coincides) answer.... I ask vein for the delayed replica... In any case, after several "incomprehensions" with the software, I must eventually say that it is not so complicated... You just have to forget about many shortcuts that with the 2d make you go like a splinter, but that in the 3d you cannot apply. . .

What shortcuts?
Do you give me an example?

 

[GiGa]

What shortcuts?
Do you give me an example?

Obviously I mean shortcuts compared to inventor, nothing special.
already create a stupid entity like a line or a circle or the trivial command copy or delete or cut... trivial commands in autocad but in inventor become not so immediate... all without considering more "advanced" gestures for reuse of data (also the simple copy & paste)... Obviously, on the other hand, starting from a 3d model, the creation of projections, distinct etc. is much easier (although not infallible).
in the end, we switch from the “granular” management of the single entity of autocad to the management of a 3d model projected in 2d with a much less unseen management.
ps: By the way, how do you cut an entity (a line, a dashboard, an axis line, etc.) into inventor? It's something I couldn't solve and I left unfinished. .

 

[Tarkus]

Obviously I mean shortcuts compared to inventor, nothing special.
already create a stupid entity like a line or a circle or the trivial command copy or delete or cut... trivial commands in autocad but in inventor become not so immediate... all without considering more "advanced" gestures for reuse of data (also the simple copy & paste)... Obviously, on the other hand, starting from a 3d model, the creation of projections, distinct etc. is much easier (although not infallible).
in the end, we switch from the “granular” management of the single entity of autocad to the management of a 3d model projected in 2d with a much less unseen management.
ps: By the way, how do you cut an entity (a line, a dashboard, an axis line, etc.) into inventor? It's something I couldn't solve and I left unfinished. .

Got it.
cutting restraint lines etc. is actually more for autocad.
I don't feel the need, I can do everything I need with the inventor's commands, however, at the limit, you better keep doing something hybrid: put into the table as much as possible with inventor and do any work of size and sew once exported in autocad.
even if so you lose the association with the solid model.