e saves copy

[Beth]

I reformulate with many pleasure dani:

I was firm to my x set which contains to a plate y recalled by search path . if I make changes to this plate y my x set regenerates and updates correctly children included.

If other axioms made earlier years use the same y plate, when I open them and regenerate them obviously will keep me the last version of the same name /code. after your quote:

((s)
I've done nothing else in the last few weeks, renames in continuous session. I have to substantially review the project of a machine, keeping the old project unchanged)))))

I have understood, perhaps wrong, that it would be useful to maintain versions of previous plate with name/code different from x for example xold1 etc. so that when I open the old assemblies "I remember!" (debatable method) of the components that have undergone updates and rename in session with these names/codes (x1 etc) I go to restore them.

I'm off the road, right?

 

[calacc]

beth, the procedure to follow according to me is this:
First you name the x axieme, which becomes x_r, save it, then save with name the y plate, which becomes y_r.
at the end, raise the x_r axieme that will mount y_r.
done
at the end of the fair you have 2 assemblies: x that mounts the plate y and x_r that mounts the plate y_r. (do not forget also the drawings drw)

 

[DANI-3D]

beth, the procedure to follow according to me is this:
First you name the x axieme, which becomes x_r, save it, then save with name the y plate, which becomes y_r.
at the end, raise the x_r axieme that will mount y_r.
done
at the end of the fair you have 2 assemblies: x that mounts the plate y and x_r that mounts the plate y_r. (do not forget also the drawings drw)

That's right. with a small shortness. savers would be better to do them all at the end of the operation, because otherwise if in the y plate you have references related to the x-component x-them they pass to the xr set, even if then there could be a trick to avoid this problem, but it would be better to avoid it.

 

[Beth]

first of all compliments for the photo of the great alex.
Perhaps I have made some clarity thanks to you all, but I ask you why it is necessary to resemble in session x_r and to find 2?
it is not better to rename in session y in y-r so that in the source directory they both figure y for the old and y-r assemblies for the new ones at this point assemblo in x y-r and continuous with the project.

 

[DANI-3D]

if you do so you lose the x set with the y component. In the other case you have both.

 

[calacc]

Yeah, he already answered you. Then it always depends on the work because maybe even the axieme x from now on will have to mount the modified plate y-r... This unfortunately we cannot know. in any case there are many possibilities because y and y-r could be two separate prt files; two family-table instanze; two prts linked by a set of interchange etc...
You could even work on a single x set and make it configurable once with the y plate and the other with y-r. there are really many possibilities. then the choice "furba" is always the one dictated by the experience.. .

 

[Beth]

beth, the procedure to follow according to me is this:
First you name the x axieme, which becomes x_r, save it, then save with name the y plate, which becomes y_r.
at the end, raise the x_r axieme that will mount y_r.
done
at the end of the fair you have 2 assemblies: x that mounts the plate y and x_r that mounts the plate y_r. (do not forget also the drawings drw)

calacc excuse

1- Firstly, the x axieme, which becomes, for example, x_r, saves,
2-poi saved with name the y plate, which becomes y_r. (i.e. save copy but in what position? in the library or in the work directory?)
3-assembli manually y-r in x-r4-In the end, raise the x_r axieme that will mount y_r.

done


at the end of the fair you have 2 assemblies: x that mounts the plate y and x_r that mounts the plate y_r. (do not forget also the drawings drw)[/QUOTE]I added steps to your procedure, did I make a mistake?

last effort, patience is a virtue of few!

 

[320i S]

calacc excuse

1- Firstly, the x axieme, which becomes, for example, x_r, saves,
2-poi saved with name the y plate, which becomes y_r. (i.e. save copy but in what position? in the library or in the work directory?)
3-assembli manually y-r in x-r4-In the end, raise the x_r axieme that will mount y_r.

done


at the end of the fair you have 2 assemblies: x that mounts the plate y and x_r that mounts the plate y_r. (do not forget also the drawings drw)

I added steps to your procedure, did I make a mistake?

last effort, patience is a virtue of few![/QUOTE]You can save copies wherever you want, the important thing is that they are in the most indicated folders, that then the system is able to recover them or with search path, or according to the folder you make them read as a work directory.

 

[calacc]

Step 3 does not exist because in x-r the plate is already assembled, you do not need to assemble anything manually. in step 2 if the y-r plate you want it in working dir you can avoid the copy save and rename in session also that, the copy save is more indicated if you want to put it in a predisposed library. apart from that you can do it even later by moving files manually from windows (as long as there is written the path in search.pro)

 

[Beth]

calaac ciao,
"pass 3 does not exist because in x-r the plate is already assembled" it is true (if I have understood something from your teachings ) if you use the rename in session , in your quote you say "you save by name the plate y, which becomes y_r" and I have intended to use the copy save but no problem!

At this point, what to do with the old axe x, I eliminate it brutally?
and if you wanted to keep in x or x-r the plate y over y-r, mistake or the only way is the save copy and manual assembly

If I messed up too much, tell me I'll stop

Thank you.

 

[calacc]

No, you're right. I messed up. using the rename in session of the plate, avoid having to manually assemble it. I was wrong in saying to step 2 to do the save copy (I wanted to write rename in session, handle!).
if you get more automatic you can do dx button replace by copy.

At this point, what to do with the old axe x, I eliminate it brutally?
and if you wanted to keep in x or x-r the plate y over y-r, mistake or the only way is the save copy and manual assembly
If I messed up too much, tell me I'll stop

if you make two renames in session: x which becomes x-r and the y component that becomes y-r. once you save x-r on disk you will have 2 assemblies: the old x axieme that mounts y and the new x-r that mounts y-r. It doesn't seem so complicated

 

[Beth]

No no I think I understand everything and I thank you very much for the advice.

Hi.

 

[320i S]

Remember that in order not to risk damaging a database, the safest procedure is always proceeding in the top-down sense, i.e. from the top-level assembly, to the sub-assiems, to the interested component.