Exatem
Guest
I will be pessimistic but I see several complications.
I try to explain why reconnecting to my previous post of "over and under the waves".
the resistance to the motion of a boat depends essentially on two causes, regardless of type or size.
- friction resistance caused by water friction against the surface of the hull and dependent on the number of reynolds.
- wave resistance generated by surface waves.
to these factors then they associate other less influential.
It is worth noting that friction resistance increases as speed increases, therefore it is necessary to seek for the required displacement and the desired speed, the forms of hull that will lead to the least waste of power.
the forms that the carena can assume are basically two, round or corner.
the round hull, called “dislocating”, with the increase of the speed reaches a wave resistance greater than that of friction and is therefore preferable for medium/low speed (sailing boat case).
the edge hull called “planant”, reached a certain speed has a resistance of friction that exceeds the wave.
there is then a third option given by the hull “semiplanante” or “semidislocante” also called “deep-v” but that at us now does not interest.
as already mentioned, the resistances to the motion are also dependent on the wave resistance that is given by the difference between the pressures in the prodier zone directed from prora to stern and the pressures of the poppiera zone that have resulted opposite.
the wave resistance of a ship depends on the speed, length, shape of the hull, i.e. the angle of penetration of the water lines, the distribution of the volume in the longitudinal sense.
with the name of "resisting resistance" means the sum between the wave resistance (indicated with rw) and the resistance of skiing or resistance of the vortices, resulting in the formation of vortices created by the famine itself and the "appendici". (indicated with rv).
the "exhaust appendixes" are: the thymones, the propellers, the roll fins and, in general, all the components of the ship immersed in the water but external to the hull that cause an additional resistance to advancement.
to determine the total resistance to rt advancement (which is not possible despite the continuous studies in the matter mathematically compute for the many and complex variables in play), we use experimental methods through the "shipping ship".
the total resistance of a scale model that meets in progress (this measurements are repeated for various speeds, so as to obtain diagrams in which the resistance is represented according to speed).
with the data thus obtained, the friction resistance of the model is calculated at various speeds.
the friction resistance, thus calculated, is subtracted from the total resistance of the model measured with the tests of trailer obtaining in this way the residual resistance of the model.
the data thus obtained are related to the real ship using the principles of mechanical similarities.
It is shown that, obtaining the relationship between the length of the real ship (ln) and the length of the model (lm) the residual resistance of the ship to the true (rrn) is obtained by multiplying the residual resistance of the model (rrm) by that high ratio to the cube.
the friction resistance of the ship is calculated in natural size (rf). the total resistance of the ship is given by the sum of the resistors so calculated.
residual resistance, above a certain speed, is above all wave resistance (rw), modest to low ranges but, which varies with the cube of speed.
the rw can be reduced by applying to the prora of the ship an appendix called "bulb", which assumes different forms, depending on the type of ship to which it is applied.
the only way to reduce the resistance value of vortices is to limit the number of famine appendixes, to draw them so that they are as far as possible hydrodynamic.
Therefore, I return to repeat, the big problem is the efficiency of a system that is born already penalized by the nautical characteristics of the hull itself.
a sailboat, equipped with drift, will significantly disturb the flow that invests the generator penalizing it further.
I'm not talking about worsening the maximum speed of the boat, but the efficiency of the generator.
I try to explain why reconnecting to my previous post of "over and under the waves".
the resistance to the motion of a boat depends essentially on two causes, regardless of type or size.
- friction resistance caused by water friction against the surface of the hull and dependent on the number of reynolds.
- wave resistance generated by surface waves.
to these factors then they associate other less influential.
It is worth noting that friction resistance increases as speed increases, therefore it is necessary to seek for the required displacement and the desired speed, the forms of hull that will lead to the least waste of power.
the forms that the carena can assume are basically two, round or corner.
the round hull, called “dislocating”, with the increase of the speed reaches a wave resistance greater than that of friction and is therefore preferable for medium/low speed (sailing boat case).
the edge hull called “planant”, reached a certain speed has a resistance of friction that exceeds the wave.
there is then a third option given by the hull “semiplanante” or “semidislocante” also called “deep-v” but that at us now does not interest.
as already mentioned, the resistances to the motion are also dependent on the wave resistance that is given by the difference between the pressures in the prodier zone directed from prora to stern and the pressures of the poppiera zone that have resulted opposite.
the wave resistance of a ship depends on the speed, length, shape of the hull, i.e. the angle of penetration of the water lines, the distribution of the volume in the longitudinal sense.
with the name of "resisting resistance" means the sum between the wave resistance (indicated with rw) and the resistance of skiing or resistance of the vortices, resulting in the formation of vortices created by the famine itself and the "appendici". (indicated with rv).
the "exhaust appendixes" are: the thymones, the propellers, the roll fins and, in general, all the components of the ship immersed in the water but external to the hull that cause an additional resistance to advancement.
to determine the total resistance to rt advancement (which is not possible despite the continuous studies in the matter mathematically compute for the many and complex variables in play), we use experimental methods through the "shipping ship".
the total resistance of a scale model that meets in progress (this measurements are repeated for various speeds, so as to obtain diagrams in which the resistance is represented according to speed).
with the data thus obtained, the friction resistance of the model is calculated at various speeds.
the friction resistance, thus calculated, is subtracted from the total resistance of the model measured with the tests of trailer obtaining in this way the residual resistance of the model.
the data thus obtained are related to the real ship using the principles of mechanical similarities.
It is shown that, obtaining the relationship between the length of the real ship (ln) and the length of the model (lm) the residual resistance of the ship to the true (rrn) is obtained by multiplying the residual resistance of the model (rrm) by that high ratio to the cube.
the friction resistance of the ship is calculated in natural size (rf). the total resistance of the ship is given by the sum of the resistors so calculated.
residual resistance, above a certain speed, is above all wave resistance (rw), modest to low ranges but, which varies with the cube of speed.
the rw can be reduced by applying to the prora of the ship an appendix called "bulb", which assumes different forms, depending on the type of ship to which it is applied.
the only way to reduce the resistance value of vortices is to limit the number of famine appendixes, to draw them so that they are as far as possible hydrodynamic.
Therefore, I return to repeat, the big problem is the efficiency of a system that is born already penalized by the nautical characteristics of the hull itself.
a sailboat, equipped with drift, will significantly disturb the flow that invests the generator penalizing it further.
I'm not talking about worsening the maximum speed of the boat, but the efficiency of the generator.