electric motor

[PierArg]

But you're making each other's super nipples?

 

[Focus]

I don't understand where this discussion is going.

:36_1_5:

 

[meccanicamg]

It seems to me that there are quite little clear ideas and well confused.

if the engine generates 3.8 n*m torque the shaft is 19 mm you have that the arm is 19/2. therefore the force that is generated in a place lying on the circumference of 19 mm is worth 400 n. if then you put 10000000000 tabs....beh is not that you have 400*10000000 forces but divides it.
torque definition or torque moment: the driving couple is the mechanical moment applied by the motor to a transmission. moment = f*brace

 

[Focus]

I had her/it clear. :smile:


Hi.

 

[Er Presidente]

It seems to me that there are quite little clear ideas and well confused.
...

I had her/it clear. :smile:


Hi.

In fact I would avoid generalizing, there is who the ideas has very clear (many) and who instead (pochi) besides having confused them also enjoys (try) to confuse those of others.

 

[eih64]

Surely all with very clear ideas:

1) one asks confirmation: if I want to know the peripheral force on the tree and just apply m=f*b . and then get 400n?
2) the other: you may be right, but it depends on how you interpret the initial question.
3) the other still: honestly

and beyond the one who then asked the question:
"however the f1 are 2 and agree on the axis, then total 400n"

To conclude then, Mr President: ". "


But everyone had very clear ideas or did they?

I agree with one thing: the initial question could be misinterpreted

 

[Focus]

without controversy, but could you explain what you understood and what was your solution? You said phrases like, "maybe I miss something...", "we're not there," "I only see and not answer..." and you're leaving with this post? We asked you where you think we were wrong and answers we didn't have. You can't say something is wrong if you don't explain why.

Hi.

 

[Er Presidente]

Surely all with very clear ideas:

1) one asks confirmation: if I want to know the peripheral force on the tree and just apply m=f*b . and then get 400n?

What's the problem? Where's that unclear?

2) the other: you may be right, but it depends on how you interpret the initial question.

This answer (inexcellent and particularly instructive) was given to you simply because it was not possible to understand where confusion was vain to understand what other interpretation could be considered.

3) the other still: honestly

That's what we do. What would be the problem, the confusion, the incipit?
So if I wanted to say:
"honestly, you seem particularly dear to me. "
What wouldn't be clear, "honestly" or "particularly"?

and beyond the one who then asked the question:
"however the f1 are 2 and agree on the axis, then total 400n"

on this point in particular I ask you to try, if you can, to argue in 10 lines which part of the statement is not clear (which you should also understand if it is only unclear or clear but you do not agree) and possibly build a reasoning on which it is possible to build a dialogue.

To conclude then, Mr President: ". "

if one, instead of argue, throws them half sentences without a logical basis, unfortunately, others think that there is who knows what reasoning behind and begin to vainly attempt to understand the possible motivation that pushed a person (of which to for granted the intellectual ability) to put those statements so little and provocatively laconic.
this activity certainly generates confusion and moves attention from the post number "2", which solved the problem without "but" and without "if". So, I repeat, there are those who try to confuse others and those who, on the contrary, have clear ideas.

But everyone had very clear ideas or did they?

All less than one!

I agree with one thing: the initial question could be misinterpreted

And here you destroyed the little you built! but how, before they were all confused (by you) and then was the initial question to be confused?

then, we summarize:
- the question was confused.
- all those who posted were confused.

Do you know the madman's joke that went on the highway?

Hi.

 

[eih64]

I don't know the madman's joke on the highway.

sin.