electrical cables in 3d

[Brethil]

to all;
I've been stressing you a little lately, I'm sorry. .

I am in the insignificant situation of creating 3d electric cables and showing them that they come out of a hollow sheath and enter an electrical box by a special hole; to be attached to the terminal in it; I already have everything, but I don't know exactly how to move to create cables and related routes....aaaaaaaaarghhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!! !

Could someone help me please?? ? ? ? ?

:smile:

 

[Ezio Olivato]

but sorry if you already have everything, why don't you put an explanatory image, since in words it becomes difficult to interpret your difficulty?

 

[Peppe]

If you have the professional there is his form, if you have the series you have to do 3d sketches..... (f1 - 3d sketches)

 

[Brethil]

Sorry, I have the bad vice to never put an explanatory photo...that barlafùss are!!!! :biggrin:
now remedy eh eh eh

cmq peppe, you have centered the question; In fact I have unmatched a little but then I came to the conclusion of creating sweep extrusions on trajectories (schizzi 3d) that pass in the points I need x create the cable.........only that is a mess, I go together my eyes; I just thought there was a more immediate system.
Unfortunately nn I have the professional version, my is only autodesk inventor suite 2011...and I know that the form you talk about, in my does not exist sigh!!!

thanks cmq of the straights, if you also have other to add are all ears

Here you are the photo:smile:

 

[Brethil]

finished box, thanks to all the same.

cables are an absurd bang to do without additional modules. - That's really an imprecation behind the other. .

cmq here is the photo

 

[GiGa]

Frankly, however, I missed the reason why to get lost to doing so many "details"... but you didn't need a front sketch to define the routes (renunciating to the overlap of the cables) and then a series of sweeps to create the exit curves?
Among other things, the grounding cable was solved with a single sketch on a tilted plane. . .
In short, just by semplicating the routes, it became much easier... and above all it did not serve the use of sketches3d (not that there is nothing wrong to use them, but the 2d are more immediate). .

ps: I admit that maybe I should have said it before, given the request for advice, but in s days I am quite messed up and it was not my first thought... next time I'll be more timely. . .
Anyway, they're great, too. They're too "luxury." . .

 

[Brethil]

Frankly, however, I missed the reason why to get lost to doing so many "details"... but you didn't need a front sketch to define the routes (renunciating to the overlap of the cables) and then a series of sweeps to create the exit curves?
Among other things, the grounding cable was solved with a single sketch on a tilted plane. . .
In short, just by semplicating the routes, it became much easier... and above all it did not serve the use of sketches3d (not that there is nothing wrong to use them, but the 2d are more immediate). .

ps: I admit that maybe I should have said it before, given the request for advice, but in s days I am quite messed up and it was not my first thought... next time I'll be more timely. . .
Anyway, they're great, too. They're too "luxury." . .

er... frankly I tried to solve the thing by reasoning to my "contort" way and in fact to get stash I put a lot of time and maybe there were ways far shorter... but also considering that I had never tried the way of 3d sketches, I would say that the result is more than good...."lussuoso" would be exaggerated, but I appreciate the compliment:biggrin:

res: don't worry, I imagine that everyone here has to do between deadlines and various deliveries, work is always work...and cmq timeliness is not a thing that can be expected from chicchessia, so go quiet and thank you for the time you have dedicated me