eliminate a feature of a compost in a family table

[Luigi_72]

Hello

I wanted to ask if someone had this need and managed to solve it with creo.
I have a set composed of various components, from this together I have to create another one by eliminating some components. I solved by creating a family table and eliminating the extra components, so far all right. things get complicated because I have to delete a feature from a component but this operation if you work with the assemblies in the family table does not make it.

I also generated a family table of the piece and I can delete a feature or change a quota (which as mentioned in the assemblies does not make me do) but the thing is not useful to me as much as I have to create a new set, always with the same elements and with the component tied by a family table, but the positioning remains untied between the two assemblies and therefore there can be errors and in case of changes you have to change by hand two assemblies.

the round seems twisted but in fact it is simple only that I was perhaps not too clear.
thanks in advance for any considerations/conferences.

 

[tartufon80]

Bye.
If I understand (but I'm not sure) the answer you gave yourself.
create an ft also of the component part, and then in the ft of the axieme call once the part with feature and once the one without feature.

but because you would have solved, and so you wouldn't have asked the question, I guess I didn't understand well.

post an example?

 

[Luigi_72]

Bye.
If I understand (but I'm not sure) the answer you gave yourself.
create an ft also of the component part, and then in the ft of the axieme call once the part with feature and once the one without feature.

but because you would have solved, and so you wouldn't have asked the question, I guess I didn't understand well.

post an example?

Thank you for responding first.
Unfortunately I have not solved with the component ft (although it seemed good as an idea) as if I say:

together 1 - complete set with component ft_01
together 2 - partial aids with compounds ft_02

between the two assemblies there is no connection if I change a share of a feature of a component they update both but the position of the components is not linked between the two (between two years I change the position of a component in the axieme 1 if I do not remember that I have to change manually also the axieme 2 this remains before modification).

 

[tartufon80]

Thank you for responding first.
Unfortunately I have not solved with the component ft (although it seemed good as an idea) as if I say:

together 1 - complete set with component ft_01
together 2 - partial aids with compounds ft_02

between the two assemblies there is no connection if I change a share of a feature of a component they update both but the position of the components is not linked between the two (between two years I change the position of a component in the axieme 1 if I do not remember that I have to change manually also the axieme 2 this remains before modification).

Well, that's right, that's two different asses. .
1 - manage the quota in ft, so if you change it you see it and if you see it as much as the doubt comes to you
2 — tie two quotas with a report, if this is feasible

 

[Luigi_72]

Hi.

I took into consideration your two assumptions but I was hoping for something more "effective" because I didn't want to rely on a "note". I could create a relationship but I do not know in the future what change could happen and what component.

I also tried to create the axieme 2 (with a ft starting from the axieme 1), eliminating only the unnecessary components and then in the axieme 2 I replaced the component with ft with its "correct" part as, being the component bound by a ft, does not lose the bonds. it worked well but then reopening the axieme 1 I realized that it had replaced them also my component :36_1_10:

I find it strange that you don't do such an operation though and that's why I was hoping there was some configuration option to set up correctly.

 

[tartufon80]

.....it worked well but then reopening the axieme 1 I realized that it had replaced me also my component :36_1_10:

I find it strange that you don't do such an operation though and that's why I was hoping there was some configuration option to set up correctly.

Well, I don't agree here.
If the axioms are in ft it is right that it is so in my opinion. when I have your needs I create different assemblies, not in ft to understand us. Maybe I use ft components, that is.

At this point, I stop and I don't think I can help you. I hope for you in some luminaire, even if I see it hard.

Good job!

 

[Luigi_72]

I also have done so far with different assemblies with components related to ft. the problem is in managing the changes, I hoped it was possible to bypass the problem but maybe it is to ask too much.
Thanks anyway for the tips, good work

 

[tartufon80]

managing the changes, I think this is the juice of the speech.
If you have this need, you can decide how and where to handle them, but you will have to.
Hi.

 

[DANI-3D]

Hello everyone
before managing the variants of a set with ft advice to give an eye to previous discussions, for example this:http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/threads/43934-gestione-varianti-in-family-table?highlight=familyAlthough the case is different, the problems of managing changes are the same.

 

[Black_Fly]

You could create a copy of the main asm, after which you remove the components that you don't need and those that remain there systems with the refurbish command, if from the components that remain you have to remove even features then you can use the fts, but at least you don't collapse the main asm.