- equancuno deer?

[ballino]

Bye to all,
Perhaps it is discounted but in view of a new contract I have sought expert technical offices in pipes that employ the add-in pipe.

in its time, a year ago, asking the various dealers scattered around the Po Valley no one had been trioted using the module.

result:
heavy models because they imported satellite files made with pipe applications on autocad.

I ask readers an opinion on the form and perhaps the name of some company/office you use in view of the prox work.

Thank you.

dancer

 

[re_solidworks]

I have a premium and then the piping package. I proposed to use it for small hydraulic plants and tires for my client but I never did. I used it a couple of times but I don't have a bookcase with the counters, the big one of the work to do is that.
I don't know anyone who uses it.

 

[MarcoBi]

pinping with this type of sw you only do it if for piping you mean " machine edge" or just oily connections.
if instead you talk about piping intended as a set of pipes, based on classes, complete with supports then do not use sw or however a modeler "general purpose".

 

[ballino]

hello marco and thank you for the straight.

in fact the situation lived as mentioned in the previous post was not too happy: importing acis files to see interference or other needles was too heavy.

I was thinking of a gold partner application, recovering the skeleton of tubes to dress in second line.

my supplier unpacked on an autocad add-in and the import of the model zavorrano not little.

I add that the time of preparation for import into sw is not so trivial (cleaning lines, same origin, ect).

I don't have to go back to pros.

dancer

 

[re_solidworks]

I'm not talking about gold partners, but solidwork routing, integrated into the premium package.

 

[Kakisan]

Hi.
we also tried to use the routing module, but we abandoned this solution because for each tube it was going to create a new part.
we domp mainly hydraulic plants on board machine, so to avoid the problem we thought to create a part, insert it into the axieme and model through 3d sketches the tube.
we create the guide sketch, on the junction (or on the terminal) we create the section of the full pipe (the unbearing is the outer diamtero) and then we create a sweep on the path.
I would say that the system does well, it is not very heavy and however we manage the various simplified configurations.
I hope I helped you.
yellow

Bye to all,
Perhaps it is discounted but in view of a new contract I have sought expert technical offices in pipes that employ the add-in pipe.

in its time, a year ago, asking the various dealers scattered around the Po Valley no one had been trioted using the module.

result:
heavy models because they imported satellite files made with pipe applications on autocad.

I ask readers an opinion on the form and perhaps the name of some company/office you use in view of the prox work.

Thank you.

dancer

 

[guitarfenix]

Good morning.

I fully share that said by "kakisan".

If you want to make pipes of buildings or similar...sw nn would manage them well if not with a big job.

sw is great for the design of machinery and therefore its module is built ad hoc for piping that could be on machinery and related.

if they are small plants the solution proposed by kakisan is the best otherwise I suggest other applications like microstation and co.

Hi.
gigs

 

[ballino]

I thank you for your experiences and for the tips in the use of routing.

I have an approach:

1) use routing to define main positions by dressing lines from time to time with objects + bulky (valves, various supports)

2) send the acis file to the external study to be overlayed to the previous one for the completion of the work.

What do you say?


thank you all,
dancer