error in the split view

[stefanobruno]

I would like to report something that happened to me this morning and alarms me.
My client calls me and tells me that a detail, fortunately very simple, does not mount.
I go to see the model and its table and find out what follows.
the table contains a split view, with sketch regularly bound to the piece, and was made when the detail had a certain size.
a proportion of the model in the meantime has varied and the table should have adjusted.
He didn't fit until I erased the split view.
I'm thrilled at the thought of what could happen to me if this came on one of those beautiful peculiarities from a few thousand euros that I occasionally do.
for the truth I had already noticed the thing (problems with the split view) for a long time but never happened to see a change of size and I had taken it as a annoying thing and nothing more.
be careful and if you reproduce report it to the assistance.

Bye.

is valid for rel. 2011 and previous.

 

[Tarkus]

but did you try again with a simple test model and a table + relative split?
I mean, do you always do it with any crack or sometimes?
If I can do two tests tonight... .

 

[stefanobruno]

I mean, do you always do it with any crack or sometimes?

the view split on a table of an overall or a detail that are subsequently modified has always given me problems.
It's the first time I notice a dimensional change.
Have you seen the pdf attachments?

 

[Tarkus]

the view split on a table of an overall or a detail that are subsequently modified has always given me problems.
It's the first time I notice a dimensional change.
Have you seen the pdf attachments?

What pdf? I don't see any attachment.

 

[stefanobruno]

What pdf? I don't see any attachment.

forgotten:

 

[davide75]

Here is the ark!! !you stretched the piece while the sketch for the split view was tied to the 80.sic long piece as when you do the sketch for the split view do not bind it this does not automatically move to the piece if it is modified. stretching the piece to 127 the piece has updated but the sketch of the split is not and surely will remain in the same position before with the piece 80 long, this loop because the sketch of the split is not bound to the piece and therefore does not follow itoppure has lost the reference of the starting point on where to do the split. At least I've noticed that if you've bound it well, I don't know what to say.

 

[stefanobruno]

I don't know what to say.

Here we go.
the sketches of the sections, of the split views and also of the " croppate ", are always bound to the edges of the piece.
all individual segments are also bound, nothing is left to itself.
the fact is that if I see the split view present in the table and, above all, there is no error signaling to the table update, I believe it and he cares.

 

[davide75]

or loses the reference point on which to perform the depth of the section