error manifold

[The_Matrix]

But do you realize?
Who doesn't use sw zimenz manco knows what a mistake like that!

If you draw 2 you look for tangents and try to extrude them with sedge you can't do it.
but if you do a set and 2 cylinders, you will fit them in tangenza no problem.
There are always import problems if you tend to convert a set (example of the bearing) to a part, it does not work.

It is not a question of this.

and what practical application would you do with it?

 

[cacciatorino]

and what practical application would you do with it?

mainly can manage imported files so that if you manage to close the solid without doing as now that leaves me a set of surfaces. solidworks has this function and is very comfortable, even to manage welded in the environment part instead of having to make a set as if (I'm talking about the multibody now).

 

[The_Matrix]

mainly can manage imported files so that if you manage to close the solid without doing as now that leaves me a set of surfaces. solidworks has this function and is very comfortable, even to manage welded in the environment part instead of having to make a set as if (I'm talking about the multibody now).

but for that it serves the multi-body in the oarte environment, not the non manifold.. .
I repeat: applications you see for non manifold?

 

[cacciatorino]

but for that it serves the multi-body in the oarte environment, not the non manifold.. .
I repeat: applications you see for non manifold?

clear that it does not have practical applications, but if it were able to manage the multibody automatically would also exceed the problem of the non manifold (the ball bearing that you now have to deal for strength as assembly bringing you back ten files in the fs when it would be enough one).

 

[SolidUser]

catia non uses acis...

You're right. I thought that acis was in general the container of cgm, ggcm and others.
a bit like solidworks, solid edge and nx that use parasolid and d-cubed, although we say that these cads use parasolid, but as you know....without d-cubed solutors, such cads would be incomplete.

 

[The_Matrix]

You're right. I thought that acis was in general the container of cgm, ggcm and others.
a bit like solidworks, solid edge and nx that use parasolid and d-cubed, although we say that these cads use parasolid, but as you know....without d-cubed solutors, such cads would be incomplete.

Do you know that d-cubed is also ours?

 

[flaviobrio88]

Do you know that d-cubed is also ours?

have faith now shoots another solution :tongue:

 

[SolidUser]

Do you know that d-cubed is also ours?

certainly.

 

[The_Matrix]

certainly.

:finger:
without us there would be few cads around... :tongue:

 

[cacciatorino]

:finger:
without us there would be few cads around... :tongue:

Let's say some of these software you bought them when they were already at a good level of development...

 

[The_Matrix]

Let's say some of these software you bought them when they were already at a good level of development...

Right. .
but our great ability was to leave them "on display" (d-cubed, parasolid) or even become standard iso (jt).
That's not what I thought.
(oh, we're not an onlus... we simply had vision)

 

[cacciatorino]

Right. .
but our great ability was to leave them "on display" (d-cubed, parasolid) or even become standard iso (jt).
That's not what I thought.
(oh, we're not an onlus... we simply had vision)

Sorry a curiosity: parasolid is an original unigraphics project? or was it developed by others? and in this case, by whom? if I don't remember badly, even if he was born on a different kernel and then passed on parasolid at the time of v4 or v5.

 

[The_Matrix]

Sorry a curiosity: parasolid is an original unigraphics project? or was it developed by others? and in this case, by whom? if I don't remember badly, even if he was born on a different kernel and then passed on parasolid at the time of v4 or v5.

parasolid was a virtually unknown kernel of the shape date (sw house English)
We bought it in the early 90s.
ug v10 was the first uug to adopt this kernel.

If he had acis... migrò a parasolid seems to me with the v5 (with great happiness of users!!)

 

[Mike1967]

try to create two tangent circles and extrude them.. Always in solidworks.
You'll see that you can't... because I'm inside the same function that tries to keep a fused object.
.

Well, I don't agree, you can extrude them at the same time, logically it is impossible that a single body, two tangent objects
cannot be joined because their contact surface is equal to zero.

 

[SolidUser]

Well, I don't agree, you can extrude them at the same time, logically it is impossible that a single body, two tangent objects
cannot be joined because their contact surface is equal to zero.

you are right, using the stratagem of the selection of contours, make sure that every composition of sketch entities that form a closed form, are considered as distinct 2d forms.
We say that in a classic use, i.e. the extrusion of the sketch, you wouldn't be able to complete the operation.