estrusioni con nx

[cacciatorino]

regarding the selection of faces to capture the edges I said a nonsense, at least for the basic extrusions. the replacement of a curve inside the sketch is possible, of a contour composed of several curves instead not.

If it makes it solid edge, I think swx does it.

 

[ceschi1959]

The thing that indisposes me a little is that you propose us a seemingly trivial exercise without making us understand where you want to finish. then after making us spend time following you completely change the cards at the table and the goal.
If you had been clear from the beginning I would not have committed twenty minutes of my time to recreate that form, I would have dedicated myself to something else. That's what I find irritating in this discussion.
View attachment 54629

we put the dots on the i:
-the thread begins with a question about the passage from sw to nx and I say mine having followed more than one migration and knowing thoroughly the problematic.
- users @stevie e @dottor_scott they say that with nx you put twice the time and that nx is far light years from the simplicity of sw
- I propose to Dr_scott a benchmark to compare, I repeat, without any controversy vis (doctor_scott non reply)
- others answer and as in the premise we realize that every cad has its own peculiarity and that the use of a cad with methods of others is not profitable.
- in addition, taking advantage of the peculiarities of nx, you can reassociate with two clicks the starting profile and get the same tray with a different profile without having to reassociate fittings and drains. This is not possible with the other cads, in fact in the example that you posted lack the background rays and the discharge.
always in order not to spark flame I apologize to all users for every misunderstanding I may have created.

 

[LaboratorioDieci]

If it makes it solid edge, I think swx does it.

This is not possible with the other cads, in fact in the example that you posted lack the background rays and the discharge.

In fact changing the sketch the derivative extrusion function updates, as it uses all the sketch as it is. already the next chord does not update, because the selected edge previously no longer exists, replaced by a new one. for which the feature is edited and corrected manually.
certain that by setting the construction in a different way you can get the desired result, but undoubtedly some flexibility is missing.

 

[PaoloColombani]

using rhino I created the profile and did the revolution of the three arches and so I closed the bottom.

 

[LaboratorioDieci]

using rhino I created the profile and did the revolution of the three arches and so I closed the bottom.

excellent technique, also usable with other systems. I have also evaluated it with solidworks, the problem that it presents is that by changing the external contour as in the videos proposed it is necessary to make sure that the profile reacts consistently with the contour for extrusion.

 

[cacciatorino]

- others answer and as in the premise we realize that every cad has its own peculiarity and that the use of a cad with methods of others is not profitable.

I'm sorry, but I'm not. First you told us to shape a certain part, and we took time to do it, choosing the most direct way to the target. then after we did it come out with the need to change the basic form: If you told us right away that we had to think about this possibility, do you think we would model the piece in the way we did it, or would we have chosen a different strategy? That's how I don't like info in installments, and if you let me point out, then who wants to follow you in this method, I honestly don't.

for the functions: the chord does, and it would probably be ahce the peripheral excavation, only that I don't want to miss half an hour looking for a road.

 

[cacciatorino]

already the next chord does not update, because the selected edge previously no longer exists, replaced by a new one. for which the feature is edited and corrected manually.

try to connect the face instead of the chain.

 

[LaboratorioDieci]

try to connect the face instead of the chain.

In fact. for the step, instead of using the move face (which would create the same problem of the connection) I opted for a differentiated emptying, as you can see from the video I posted above.

 

[Dottor_Scott]

we put the dots on the i:
(...cut)
- I propose to Dr_scott a benchmark to compare, I repeat, without any controversy vis (doctor_scott non risponde)
(... cut)

You're right, I've seen the mail on the cell, but then I've been on the road and I forgot about it. A nice post came out, as soon as I get a second, I reread it and study it.

 

[Utente NX]

propongo un benchmark, if you go and without any controversy.
you must realize a semi-box, as in the attached figure, explaining with what features.

look that nx, solidwoks and solid edge use the same geometric engine, then do such a trivial test, the only difference you will find is the method used by users. I have been a nx user for years now and I am also a solidworks user and I can assure you that on some environments we are not yet superior to solidworks.
the environment together, performance in loading, drafting, lamiere environment, work in environment together, welding, rendering and more.
the differences you see on niche environments.