Per5
Guest
hi guys, someone managed to improve the slowness of the table with version 2015-2016. I started using it seriously but the design part is slow, sometimes exasperating.
Biggmetals
Guest
What do you mean by slowness? when does it occur? I have 2016 but I have never noticed particular slowdowns. . .
Per5
Guest
At the same time, even too complex, moving from one view to another becomes a titanic enterprise.
continuous updates, the zomm with the snappy wheel, once stopped must rebuild the view.
I checked the inverosimile, decreased the image quality at minimum levels.
removed the automatic view refresh, but I still find it slow.
I don't understand what hardware I want to make this software work smoothly.
I have understood in these days that converting a body into sheet metal is one thing not to do, the development of a body converted into sheet metal really takes too many seconds, not to mention a separate cut that besides I did not have even checked the voice so that it does not do it, but also loses time to do it.
I am really disappointed, I understand that wrong to learn and avoid making certain mistakes then, but it is not possible to find yourself at the end of a project with the functional 3d part and the indecent board part, as it may be that the lines are heavier than the solid.
I don't understand what I'm wrong
continuous updates, the zomm with the snappy wheel, once stopped must rebuild the view.
I checked the inverosimile, decreased the image quality at minimum levels.
removed the automatic view refresh, but I still find it slow.
I don't understand what hardware I want to make this software work smoothly.
I have understood in these days that converting a body into sheet metal is one thing not to do, the development of a body converted into sheet metal really takes too many seconds, not to mention a separate cut that besides I did not have even checked the voice so that it does not do it, but also loses time to do it.
I am really disappointed, I understand that wrong to learn and avoid making certain mistakes then, but it is not possible to find yourself at the end of a project with the functional 3d part and the indecent board part, as it may be that the lines are heavier than the solid.
I don't understand what I'm wrong
Biggmetals
Guest
I do not use the sheet module first, so I do not know what it is and the heaviness of its functions. I would recommend you write the pc specifications where you meet the problem.
for completeness you should attach something to see if even other users from your own problem.
if you make a pack n'go of some files I can tell you if on my (use 2016) well known slowdowns
for completeness you should attach something to see if even other users from your own problem.
if you make a pack n'go of some files I can tell you if on my (use 2016) well known slowdowns
Biggmetals
Guest
sorry for the double post;
I noticed now that there was page 1 of this discussion, where you already put the pc specifications.
(the forum sent me to page 2 automatically)
try to load a file
I noticed now that there was page 1 of this discussion, where you already put the pc specifications.
(the forum sent me to page 2 automatically)
try to load a file
MassiVonWeizen
Guest
the heaviness of a set does not depend on the quantity of details, but on how they are shaped.
engines, underfinished sketches, repetitions of non-geographical funbtions, sketches in the axioms, external references, equations and global values in general all those things that need recalculation.
without counting how the system settings are set
now I am making drawings of an external study in which a toothed wheel has been molded very badly, the teeth have been made using an underdefinite autocad sketch, the bevel on the whole external profile employs 10s of reconstruction, there are 3 other underdefinite sketches of verification but of fact influential for modeling and the model weighs almost 4mb; this model is mounted on a gear motor (imported) with also present the screws of the label identifier (just to make you understand the level of detail) of the weight of 16mb... the drawings of the axieme are an agony, but it is fault of the models not of the design environment
engines, underfinished sketches, repetitions of non-geographical funbtions, sketches in the axioms, external references, equations and global values in general all those things that need recalculation.
this is not autocad, the lines are not two-dimensional as you think and each entity is parametric and connected with the model 3d
without counting how the system settings are set
now I am making drawings of an external study in which a toothed wheel has been molded very badly, the teeth have been made using an underdefinite autocad sketch, the bevel on the whole external profile employs 10s of reconstruction, there are 3 other underdefinite sketches of verification but of fact influential for modeling and the model weighs almost 4mb; this model is mounted on a gear motor (imported) with also present the screws of the label identifier (just to make you understand the level of detail) of the weight of 16mb... the drawings of the axieme are an agony, but it is fault of the models not of the design environment
Per5
Guest
ok I take note of everything and I attach the hardware features of the pc.
regarding the pack and go where can I send it?
I have to review all the components, one thing I've noticed that the software works badly is the conversion of solid sheet metal, I thought I would make the standard structures of conveyors by getting them from structural elements to be inserted in the library and then convert them into sheet metal, but I think it was the most wrong idea ever.
the whole 3d part flies, the table is agonizing
regarding the pack and go where can I send it?
I have to review all the components, one thing I've noticed that the software works badly is the conversion of solid sheet metal, I thought I would make the standard structures of conveyors by getting them from structural elements to be inserted in the library and then convert them into sheet metal, but I think it was the most wrong idea ever.
the whole 3d part flies, the table is agonizing
Attachments
MassiVonWeizen
Guest
explains this passage better, maybe by attaching a file
Per5
Guest
Good morning to all,
I insert the link.https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hujnbki6x0mzirpktyotr3mjn06kfr7j/view?usp=sharingI practically created standard profiles in the library, and used these profiles to get the shape of the structure, and then convert the whole into sheet metal.
However, only the table of this in my case is problematic.
I obviously went wrong and the factors to make the files unmanageable were added.
I also used to run the dentate wheels starting from autocad sketches, instead of keeping the unscrupulous sketch I positioned it in the origin and I made everything fixed with the dedicated bond, otherwise I was to work on the individual lines and became a job too long.
Would that be incorrect?
I insert the link.https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hujnbki6x0mzirpktyotr3mjn06kfr7j/view?usp=sharingI practically created standard profiles in the library, and used these profiles to get the shape of the structure, and then convert the whole into sheet metal.
However, only the table of this in my case is problematic.
I obviously went wrong and the factors to make the files unmanageable were added.
I also used to run the dentate wheels starting from autocad sketches, instead of keeping the unscrupulous sketch I positioned it in the origin and I made everything fixed with the dedicated bond, otherwise I was to work on the individual lines and became a job too long.
Would that be incorrect?
MassiVonWeizen
Guest
Can't you attach them to the forum?
Per5
Guest
In what sense, where I can upload them, with attaching files the size exceeds those allowed.
can you use a forum cloud service?
or is an image sufficient?
can you use a forum cloud service?
or is an image sufficient?
MassiVonWeizen
Guest
bhé is certainly not a particular with two saucers on the cross...
- Meanwhile it eliminates what you don't need (there is a sketch development carpet that doesn't serve anything as well as 3 floors)
- Then do sketches to use them to make guided holes and then eventually do double sketches is redundant (because)
- You have underfinished sketches.
- there are functions to convert in sheet metal (convert-solid 7÷11) of flat plates.(What is it,? or if you need to fail immediately in sheet metal
Perhaps you can improve other things, but obviously you cannot establish without being inside the project
the bottleneck is however the conversion in sheet of the structural members
this regarding the model
- Meanwhile it eliminates what you don't need (there is a sketch development carpet that doesn't serve anything as well as 3 floors)
- Then do sketches to use them to make guided holes and then eventually do double sketches is redundant (because)
- You have underfinished sketches.
- there are functions to convert in sheet metal (convert-solid 7÷11) of flat plates.(What is it,? or if you need to fail immediately in sheet metal
Perhaps you can improve other things, but obviously you cannot establish without being inside the project
the bottleneck is however the conversion in sheet of the structural members
this regarding the model
MassiVonWeizen
Guest
in drawing apart a slight slowness in opening the file I find no problems with manipulation. creating or moving views, creating sections....
Per5
Guest
I thank you for the advice, now reopening it seems to be better, yesterday it gave me a series of continuous recalculations that I did not understand, and it continued to recalculate the update of the separate cut, in fact below among other things quickly passed the message to remove that check.
to keep open the file of the structure more together perhaps worked much more.
to keep open the file of the structure more together perhaps worked much more.
MassiVonWeizen
Guest
Once you have defined the cut-off set, remove the automatic update (if you make any changes, do the update manually)
Per5
Guest
do you have to check out the options or is there a more agile way?
Per5
Guest
Thank you for your precious help.
I'm on my way.
I'm on my way.
MassiVonWeizen
Guest
I bring this observation made while developing drawings with the views of a dwg.
As the design is already definitive and I only have to elaborate the production development instead of remaking the 3d by making every sketch start from the 3 views of the imported dwg and work on it.
by curiosity I make a statistics of functions and I realize that with imported sketch, without constraints and without fixed entity the reconstruction is 0.09 seconds; instead putting all the entities as fixed the time sketches to 0,64 seconds.
keep this in mind when you are slowed down
As the design is already definitive and I only have to elaborate the production development instead of remaking the 3d by making every sketch start from the 3 views of the imported dwg and work on it.
by curiosity I make a statistics of functions and I realize that with imported sketch, without constraints and without fixed entity the reconstruction is 0.09 seconds; instead putting all the entities as fixed the time sketches to 0,64 seconds.
keep this in mind when you are slowed down
stevie
Guest
which is in contradiction with what you said before... having all the defined constraints should not be faster?