explosion of a joint

[MARCO-90]

Good morning.

I ran the construction of a witness and in a second time I tried to make an explosion.

as first I used the "exploding view" command and I performed the explosion manually by putting for each component the distance I wanted.

I tried to put the fleg in the command "automatic dispatching of the components after dragging"but the explosion me alone in one direction.
Does the automatic explosion of an axieme exist in various directions?

I should also perform the ball of each part though doing that the lines do not overlap and do not intersect, and the details do not overlap each other.you usually do as you do? Is there a command or something I don't know? ?

 

[alpino76]

This is also my concern, we expect answers

 

[reggio]

interesting question, I on youtube found (but not yet looked) these below, but who knows if the forum gurus will give us qlc their pearl of wisdom in addition
[youtube]xn-8wjxuyzy[/youtube][youtube]zaodboxzgtm[/youtube][youtube]5tmgflbna9w[/youtube][youtube]beboyfay6wm[/youtube][youtube]scxn5ocqdjc[/youtube][youtube]9?[/youtube]

 

[Mike1967]

interesting question, I on youtube found (but not yet looked) these below, but who knows if the forum gurus they will give us their pearl of wisdom in addition

would be nice to receive answers to questions asked to you... as in This is what I wantwhere you didn't let us know anything... I'm still waiting.

 

[alex_cm]

Good morning.
I ran the construction of a witness and in a second time I tried to make an explosion.[...]

bye;
no, there is no command that makes the automatic explosion of the whole assembly (at least not in swx2011).
partly understandable: the software is not able - I believe - to understand the order and direction of assembly of any type of component. It would risk an explosion of the aid, but without a logical order.
for example e-drawings has/had such a useful function to understand which (intensive as form) components constituted the axieme "in one glance".

for the ball, you can proceed with "automatic rounding".
select the view and start the command. click on the flag "bubbling flaws" to connect the lines of the individual balls to the faces instead of the vertices and then remove the flag from "no multiple instances".
the ball option all components, even if repeated, provided they are completely visible in the view.

 

[reggio]

where you didn't let us know anything... I'm still waiting.

... I will be long (but also very long true soliduser?) but sooner or later I arrive. . .

in the next message I want to read that you have (you have) solved.

...in this case it's been 2 weeks that I'd "scappe" another help question and "I've been holding" just because I wanted to "close that argument" and also This is..., (then there would be at least 4/5 much + old) but the total engraving in which I am immersed did not allow me to stop 1 second to look and solve giving precedence to the "vile and slave production" ...
next week I promise to look at the topic and give just satisfaction to the friends of the forum:wink:

 

[re_solidworks]

Yet I have a memory of an automatic explosion command several years ago in solidworks.
Of course the doubts are based, apart from the demos it never worked to the point that I never used it. I don't even remember how it was done. tomorrow in the office I look at us, a system similar to that of 3dvia composed, but I am not entirely certain.

 

[Uni_Mo]

I should also perform the ball of each part though doing that the lines do not overlap and do not intersect, and the details do not overlap each other.you usually do as you do? Is there a command or something I don't know? ?

Hello, Marco.
I think you're trying to make a spare catalogue, right?

Well, solidwork isn't exactly the ideal program. . .
we generally import the 3d in a German software cadprocess (formerly itedo today ptc) and then use for the remainder illustrator.
3d explosions generally have a few problems:
1. are incomprehensible for the number of rows that the cad keeps.
2. keep the original size (so if I have a huge frame and a screw or another small spare size this latter becomes a black dot.
3. If you picture raster, more I enlarge and lean more.

so better to switch to other software... !
for some example: http://www.unistudiomodena.it/pagine/page_portfolio_w_cr.html
:mixed:

 

[SolidUser]

solidworks had the command 'exploding everything', but as already shared by others, it made a big mess.
So they removed it to leave room for the manual explosion.

 

[SolidUser]

Hello, Marco.
I think you're trying to make a spare catalogue, right?

Well, solidwork isn't exactly the ideal program. . .
we generally import the 3d in a German software cadprocess (formerly itedo today ptc) and then use for the remainder illustrator.
3d explosions generally have a few problems:
1. are incomprehensible for the number of rows that the cad keeps.
2. keep the original size (so if I have a huge frame and a screw or another small spare size this latter becomes a black dot.
3. If you picture raster, more I enlarge and lean more.

so better to switch to other software... !
for some example: http://www.unistudiomodena.it/pagine/page_portfolio_w_cr.html
:mixed:

Sorry if I allow myself, but the documentation you put as an example of your works, you can perform quietly with solidworks, apart from color photos and the layout that you do with ms office products.

If you tell us how much cadprocess or isodraw cost, I could safely suggest 3dvia composed that has no rivals between the big siemens and ptc.

 

[Marcos555]

hi marco 90

I think that this job you have to make a component at a time, so at least they are exploded well and in the case of the balls are made visible depending on the location, number and need.

I then noticed that for the ball some components are small and therefore the darts do not distinguish well the component, in that case the arrow line you do shorter and the dart set it on a different scale.

p.s the explosion automatically with the selection of a whole set makes it catia v5

 

[Mike1967]

ciao marco 90
I think this job you have to make a component at a time, so at least they are exploded well and in the case of the pellets are made visible depending on the position, number and need.

I then noticed that for the ball some components are small and therefore the darts do not distinguish well the component, in that case the arrow line you do shorter and the dart set it on a different scale.

p.s the explosion automatically with the selection of a whole set makes it catia v5

is incorrect: You can blow up a subaxieme by choosing to keep it "united" or explode every component at a given distance.

 

[re_solidworks]

Hello, Marco.
I think you're trying to make a spare catalogue, right?

Well, solidwork isn't exactly the ideal program. . .
we generally import the 3d in a German software cadprocess (formerly itedo today ptc) and then use for the remainder illustrator.
3d explosions generally have a few problems:
1. are incomprehensible for the number of rows that the cad keeps.
2. keep the original size (so if I have a huge frame and a screw or another small spare size this latter becomes a black dot.
3. If you picture raster, more I enlarge and lean more.

so better to switch to other software... !
for some example: http://www.unistudiomodena.it/pagine/page_portfolio_w_cr.html
:mixed:

Well, it's not said. often exploded in solidworks just to show the assemblies within the drawing together, for the climbers who will use this design.
I'm not entirely in agreement with what you say. of manuals with images extracted from solidworks I made several of them and the graphic result is proportional to the time it devotes itself to cure the work (not centuries, however),
I do not use vector even with 3dvia composer, I prefer raster and at this point the difference is not so great.
certainly with 3dvia or similar software work speeds up and from the graphic point of view there are extra options, but you can do well even with only cad.

for the number of rows just select the appropriate display type, for the case of the screw in the large frame... you can make a detailed view in the same image or extract two images.
with the swx tiff extraction you can set to capture the print with the dpi you want, so you can extract images of excellent resolution.

boredom comes when arrows, distinct, bubbles, etc... you do everything with swx, but here 3dvia increases productivity in a considerable way (I think abortext is equivalent even if I have never seen it).

 

[erik.bo]

I say mine, even if I never made cataloghji spare parts used 3d via composer. from the demos it seems comfortable and above all updates with the changes of the assieme!! What I don't think that sw that usually use external studies that make catalogs manage to do, since they practically only crop and stack dxf or similar. at least that's what I realized they do in the company where they are. or they're smart or I don't know... wherever I want to know your opinion, I care.

king: oh... but how many things can you do? but are you 150 years old?

 

[Ivan1990]

I say mine, even if I never made cataloghji spare parts used 3d via composer. from the demos it seems comfortable and above all updates with the changes of the assieme!! What I don't think that sw that usually use external studies that make catalogs manage to do, since they practically only crop and stack dxf or similar. at least that's what I realized they do in the company where they are. or they're smart or I don't know... wherever I want to know your opinion, I care.

3d via composer does this, take views of the aid you need and cares in the manual, where you can do everything and more, I think it is useful only for aunts who do so many manuals or who have to explain step by step a method of assembly. If you happen to do a manual every now and then with the cad and a little head you can do everything:biggrin:

 

[re_solidworks]

king: oh... but how many things can you do? but are you 150 years old?

too few for what I should / I would like to know how to do. Anyway, I'm a young thirty-four-year-old.