export indecent render revit

[ocraM999]

unsatisfied with the cloud I performed a revit rendering (the result is better not excellent but patience), except the image and the quality goes to make..... .
below a close comparison between two screen-shots showing evidence of data loss.

Can you do better?

Mar

 

[MB78]

you have too small frame size (10mm x 10mm) so that something decent can come out

 

[ocraM999]

you have too small frame size (10mm x 10mm) so that something decent can come out

If you look at the two figures well, despite the small size of the sample, there is a remarkable difference in image definition.
actually the two images belong to the same rendering generated by revit; the first is as it appears immediately at the end of the rendering process, the second is as it appears after the image is recalled by the project browser.
malauguramente the program in the process of saving the image burns, so to speak, some pixels (some graphics say with a bad term jpegizza the image).
in other words revit first shows the result of rendering but then saves it in a poor way.
revit exports poorly in any format, jpg, tiff...etc... and in any size 150, 300... pixels.
all this is particularly evident if the starting image is rendered as optimal....
Perhaps someone, more experienced than me, will have noticed and solved this inconvenience. .
Mar