f-35 willdie

[stefanobruno]

What's the matter, they build double planes and we're good!
a "view" of design, only a magazine.
and those who do the software that will be "ready" in 2022 are the same who have given advice from the states to the site italia.it?

 

[Exatem]

This is the first Italian f35. . .

 

[stevie]

Why would the gripen be preferable to the hornet?

the gripen is not a fighter bomber, it is a hunt and more than old conception (end of the '70s). the eurofighter is at least 2 generations ahead, so there is no point in citing it. returning to the speech f-35 the only Italian interest was related to the vertical take-off model, but above all on this variant the development is in the high sea.

 

[Er Presidente]

both projects were born in 1983, both fighterbombardieri of the fourth generation and a half.
the gripen flew in 1988 the typhoon in 1994, entered service of the gripen 1996, eurofighter 2003.
I don't think it's a Swedes' fault that they're quick to develop cars.

When, and if the f-35b comes into service, we'll see some nice ones, especially the automomy will be interesting to evaluate. Now they start to put their hands on and prepare the ground for when they find out that to sow the helicopters they will have to replace they will have to take the outer tanks, and so the war load will be, so to speak, "accessory".

 

[Lettore espatriato]

the gripen is not a fighter bomber, it is a hunt and more than old conception (end of the '70s). the eurofighter is at least 2 generations ahead, so there is no point in citing it. returning to the speech f-35 the only Italian interest was related to the vertical take-off model, but above all on this variant the development is in the high sea.

I think there were 15 for the Navy and 75 for aviation... the 75 should be the a and the 15 version b ... I don't think the strong plate ... it is better to build a new aircraft carrier that embarks "normal" air . I think the orders for a 4-5 ships have just started . or is there any treaty that imposes only ships like cauliflower or garibaldi?

 

[Er Presidente]

I think there were 15 for the Navy and 75 for aviation... the 75 should be the a and the 15 version b ... I don't think the strong plate ... it is better to build a new aircraft carrier that embarks "normal" air . I think the orders for a 4-5 ships have just started . or is there any treaty that imposes only ships like cauliflower or garibaldi?

to use the "c" standard naval version, serve the catapults, a carrier with all the crypts, a much larger and complex "business" of a simple helicopter carrier like the cauliur.

 

[Lettore espatriato]

good president
speaking of "normal" aircraft I referred to the gripen / ef for the aeronautica and the rafale or f18 for the carriers that have a lower cost .as I think you already suggested some post ago... Since all the total f35 is around 18 billion euros, with 9 billion euros (I see that here in uk with 8 if I have died but we also add the usual Italian "reload" ) remain at least 9 billion that to 100 million the one included of exchanges would be 90 aircraft.... Surely they wouldn't be "invisible"... but it seems to me that only the f22 is "so" invisible.... In fact, if they are kept very tight . then, while being theoretically a "pacific" , I believe that if you spend 18 billion euros for weapons, it is worth spending as much as possible on your territory .... Those planes, having less secret technologies, could be more easily produced in Italy... at least in most... not only the sx wing....... for the carrier we would have at least 4 or 5 yards to saturate .
What do you think?

 

[Lettore espatriato]

in the "fogue" I left a thought...
" ....with 9 billion builds a "complete" aircraft carrier (I see here in uk .... "
Damn cell...