folle76
Guest
Hello.
I would like to know from some expert in welding (which is either a welding technician or even a welding engineer (from what I understand, there are these figures)) what are the best parameters to weld the attached joint.
I would need a more academic than industrial response. the static and fatigued estate must not come into question (they have already been verified by me and others).
list here the data so far collected by a welding technician from us consulted:
1) non-radiographable welding, nor ultrasonic welding. only macrographs can be done.
2) the optimal preheat ranges from 50°c to 80°c.
3) it is advisable to make a first tig pass with intake material and finish the welding wire.
4) seems to be useless postheating or heat treatment of distension as it is trivial and weldable carbon steel.
My question is:
to avoid glues, porosity, lack of penetration and to have a class b according to iso 5817, is it correct as all written above?
Can you do something else? Can you work on cianphrine?
a higher preheating and thermal treatment of distension improve the results highlighted by macrographies? or is it pure theory?
is it true that the only way to avoid disputes by the customer passes by a wps agreed by the parties, otherwise this type of joint could always be subject to disputes by the customer, since macro "perfect" is impossible to have them?
Is there any other kind of contractual or ndt control solution you can do?
I thank all those who want to participate in the debate.
I would like to know from some expert in welding (which is either a welding technician or even a welding engineer (from what I understand, there are these figures)) what are the best parameters to weld the attached joint.
I would need a more academic than industrial response. the static and fatigued estate must not come into question (they have already been verified by me and others).
list here the data so far collected by a welding technician from us consulted:
1) non-radiographable welding, nor ultrasonic welding. only macrographs can be done.
2) the optimal preheat ranges from 50°c to 80°c.
3) it is advisable to make a first tig pass with intake material and finish the welding wire.
4) seems to be useless postheating or heat treatment of distension as it is trivial and weldable carbon steel.
My question is:
to avoid glues, porosity, lack of penetration and to have a class b according to iso 5817, is it correct as all written above?
Can you do something else? Can you work on cianphrine?
a higher preheating and thermal treatment of distension improve the results highlighted by macrographies? or is it pure theory?
is it true that the only way to avoid disputes by the customer passes by a wps agreed by the parties, otherwise this type of joint could always be subject to disputes by the customer, since macro "perfect" is impossible to have them?
Is there any other kind of contractual or ndt control solution you can do?
I thank all those who want to participate in the debate.