• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

fem analysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gianf85
  • Start date Start date

Gianf85

Guest
Hello, guys.
I have drawn in sw a hopper for the unloading of granular solids and now I have to perform resistance verification on each part before placing the order. I heard that with sw it is possible to have indications about the efforts agents on the structure but in the old discussions I found nothing relevant. I found something similar to the fem analysis in floxpress. Unfortunately it only brings water and air as fluids and also with these I can not use it.
Does anyone explain how it works?
or, more generally, someone can explain to me how to perform fem analysis with software? always if it is a possible operation. . :smile:
thanks in advance for the answers.
greetings,
janfranco
 
Do you do it right by curiosity, or will the result affect the order?

In the second case, I would strongly suggest you leave. fem is not like a customization software for ordering a car
 
Gianf85 said:
Hello, guys.
I have drawn in sw a hopper for the unloading of granular solids and now I have to perform resistance verification on each part before placing the order. I heard that with sw it is possible to have indications about the efforts agents on the structure but in the old discussions I found nothing relevant. I found something similar to the fem analysis in floxpress. Unfortunately it only brings water and air as fluids and also with these I can not use it.
Does anyone explain how it works?
or, more generally, someone can explain to me how to perform fem analysis with software? always if it is a possible operation. . :smile:
thanks in advance for the answers.
greetings,
janfranco
Click to expand...
mah si go...use cfd software to make fem simulations...:eek:
both give you as results many beautiful colored drawings if it's what you're interested in
 
Fulvio Romano said:
Do you do it right by curiosity, or will the result affect the order?

In the second case, I would strongly suggest you leave. fem is not like a customization software for ordering a car
Click to expand...
I need to have some indications on the most stressed sections and the extent of the stress so as to properly dimensional the thicknesses. I think we can also get a software.. :d obviously before the placing on the table for the order I will make the analysis of jourawski with paper and pen but as this is not properly my field (I am a chemical engineer) I think that such indications will return useful when I draw the sums.
 
Gianf85 said:
Hello, guys.
I have drawn in sw a hopper for the unloading of granular solids and now I have to perform resistance verification on each part before placing the order. I heard that with sw it is possible to have indications about the efforts agents on the structure but in the old discussions I found nothing relevant. I found something similar to the fem analysis in floxpress. Unfortunately it only brings water and air as fluids and also with these I can not use it.
Does anyone explain how it works?
or, more generally, someone can explain to me how to perform fem analysis with software? always if it is a possible operation. . :smile:
thanks in advance for the answers.
greetings,
janfranco
Click to expand...
guarda la guida (:biggrin:):http://help.solidworks.com/2010/ita....html?id=b5b703d2ab6d441eb129f8360523ead5#pg0..if you have a premium go to the previous item simulation.

but how they made you understand are useful applications if you "know the craft" and you know what you are doing. programs do not do "all alone", and then you have to know how to interpret the results.
and explain a topic so vast and "difficult" in a forum is impossible, as well as just explain the features of such programs, used by those who already know how to do it.

greetings
Marco:smile:
 
sampom said:
guarda la guida (:biggrin:):http://help.solidworks.com/2010/ita....html?id=b5b703d2ab6d441eb129f8360523ead5#pg0..if you have a premium go to the previous item simulation.

but how they made you understand are useful applications if you "know the craft" and you know what you are doing. programs do not do "all alone", and then you have to know how to interpret the results.
and explain a topic so vast and "difficult" in a forum is impossible, as well as just explain the features of such programs, used by those who already know how to do it.

greetings
Marco:smile:
Click to expand...
Here, I had even wrong command!! :
as usual you were clear and helpful. :smile:
I found simulationxpress very intuitive and some preliminary indication I think I can draw it.
Now I just have to study the theory of resistance testing. .
Fortunately I only have isostatic beams undercut and bending so I am confident. :smile:
Thank you very much.
greetings,
janfranco
 
You could have answered him a little more politely.
one of the first weapons cannot know certain things
 
Whooring said:
You could have answered him a little more politely.
one of the first weapons cannot know certain things
Click to expand...
Sorry.
but what answer do you hear? (Let us use always the quoting)

If you refer to me (as it would appear from the chronological sequence of interventions) I invite you to reread (and above all understand) all interventions carefully (even between the lines and with the emoticons). then try again to "cut" judgments.

does not seem to me (and it was absolutely not my intention.. and it is clear) that it was rude. at the limit could complain to the interested person (who "know" and maybe was the first to welcome him in the forum).. rereading his "responses" (do this too) there is no resentment, indeed.

I still invite you to explain yourself better. Thank you.

greetings
Mar
 
Last edited:
sampom said:
Sorry.
but what answer do you hear? (Let us use always the quoting)

If you refer to me (as it would appear from the chronological sequence of interventions) I invite you to reread (and above all understand) all interventions carefully (even between the lines and with the emoticons). then try again to "cut" judgments.

does not seem to me (and it was absolutely not my intention.. and it is clear) that it was rude. at the limit could complain to the interested person (who "know" and maybe was the first to welcome him in the forum).. rereading his "responses" (do this too) there is no resentment, indeed.

I still invite you to explain yourself better. Thank you.

greetings
Mar
Click to expand...
I think whooring was referring to stevie's comment, certainly not to yours because I also thanked you... :smile:
however whooring thanks for solidarity and do not worry about the comment of stevie. I took it as the comment of one who had nothing to write and so I avoided fighting. :smile:
I am a chemical engineer so I know very well how to consider the results of the simulators, simply I am not an expert in this field so the help of the software comes back useful.
greetings,
janfranco
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 0 (members: 0, guests: 0)
Back
Top