field of specialization mechanical engineering

[Marco93!]

Hi, I'm dating the mechanic engineering master and I've come to the point of having to choose the branch where to specialize. I often change my mind because there are many things I like.
resumes are
mechanical engineering
dynamics of mechanical systems
machines
thermotechnical
manufacturing and manufacturing technology
production and manufacture of polymer materials

those that I like most are dynamics of mechanical systems and technology production, but I have excellent bases in mechanical constructions, which I like, where I am good, but not like the other two sectors. where in dynamics I have some gaps.

I wanted to ask you what sector is most requested by companies, I would not like to specialize in a field of little interest in the world of work.

 

[meccanicamg]

If you do that... and you want to throw all the machines and you can also become executive. briance and exile are full of these needs

 

[Marco93!]

Are you referring to machine constraints?
I would like to work on a field near industrial automation, you say it can go as a choice?

 

[meccanicamg]

certainly that can go.

 

[Marco93!]

certainly that can go.

speaking with electric colleagues I have a little not recommended this choice because in the future there will be less and less mechanical and less dimensional. . .

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

speaking with electric colleagues I have a little not recommended this choice because in the future there will be less and less mechanical and less dimensional. . .

It sounds like a silly statement. anything to be produced needs a machine unless you return to the time of the fern and the stick.
look around and think that everything around you was built by a car; directly ( pc, keyboard, stereo) or indirectly (the machine that cut the frame of the picture, the machine that built the penalty with which you take notes, the machine that cut the tree and the one that turned into paper your notebook block)
Perhaps you go towards an era more and more managed by electronics, but what does the electronics do if not to command machines?

 

[TECNOMODEL]

It sounds like a silly statement. anything to be produced needs a machine unless you return to the time of the fern and the stick.
look around and think that everything around you was built by a car; directly ( pc, keyboard, stereo) or indirectly (the machine that cut the frame of the picture, the machine that built the penalty with which you take notes, the machine that cut the tree and the one that turned into paper your notebook block)
Perhaps you go towards an era more and more managed by electronics, but what does the electronics do if not to command machines?

quoto in pieno.

 

[numero1]

speaking with electric colleagues I have a little not recommended this choice because in the future there will be less and less mechanical and less dimensional. . .

I think it's stupid unless your electrical colleagues want to say that in Italy, there will be less and less dimensionalities.

 

[meccanicamg]

Bah... have distorted ideas because electrics will have to handle drives very well to ensure performance, but the inertias we create them mechanical. nothing is created.
The cars buy them all....there is iron and aluminum and plastic...and there are those who build the machines to make extruders, rolling mills, welders, lathes and cutters... so we use the brain before we say cocomerate, thank you.

 

[ceschi1959]

as a general address I recommend to attend courses-addresses that require specific teaching.
I give you my example: with the senno of then I science of constructions or constructions of machines with cabbage that I would have learned it without a specific course, while programming, at a somewhat more than basic level, I managed to learn it, with the help of others, but without specific courses university.
This is my experience and it is not said that it is yours.
Hi.

 

[Marco93!]

as a general address I recommend to attend courses-addresses that require specific teaching.
I give you my example: with the senno of then I science of constructions or constructions of machines with cabbage that I would have learned it without a specific course, while programming, at a somewhat more than basic level, I managed to learn it, with the help of others, but without specific courses university.
This is my experience and it is not said that it is yours.
Hi.

thanks to all of the answers.
in the sector construction of machines teach us to use ansys. I think it's not easy to learn by myself. while they say production is easier to fill even individually.
the industry where I would like to work would be automation/robotic, I know that then it would have been better to do automation engineering right away, but I like the physical part of the problem not at software level. as a mechanic I do not know whether the curriculum construction of machines or mechanics applied to machines is more suitable.

 

[meccanicamg]

according to me the thing is very individual and depends on its inclinations and predispositions.

if one designs and manages automation and assembly machines has to do with;
- cinematic and dynamic
- handling, pneumatic and hydraulic and electrical
- mechanical components and machining of various materials
- engines, gearboxes, presses and moulds
- belts and pulleys
and a lot of other things and all this for you only have made mechanics. then comes the software and management drives and various axes.