flange uni 1629

[Exatem]

I also do this, first I always try.......... :smile:

Could you change your name to 3ad?
You know flange uni says everything and nothing, wouldn't it be better to flange uni 1629?
mine is only a suggestion of course, so one when looking finds something + precise :mixed:

happy to know that the problem has come back... and as far as the question is concerned...... look here:
http://augusto.digitpa.gov.it/Here's where I found him:biggrin:

thanks to google obviously.
Hi.

I can't change the title to the 3ad, the moderator of the area is focus. I agree with you, the title is too generic.
if focus reads, I would accept the suggestion number1.
Bye.

 

[Focus]

I can't change the title to the 3ad, the moderator of the area is focus. I agree with you, the title is too generic.
if focus reads, I would accept the suggestion number1.
Bye.

servito! :tongue::biggrin::finger:

 

[Exatem]

servito! :tongue::biggrin::finger:

:36_1_11:

 

[numero1]

servito! :tongue::biggrin::finger:

thanks focus...... :finger:

@exatem: then do you like me?

Hi.

 

[Exatem]

@ exatem: others and augustos?
ciao

I have not yet been able to devote the time it deserves.
I'm on vacation and I'm on time and for a short time but, when I return, I think I'll deepen my knowledge of hope...:biggrin:

thanks and hi.:finger:

 

[numero1]

this research has impassioned me ....... and in these 2 links:
http://www.rizzio.it/pdf/2008-pag066-089-grigio.pdfhttp://www.rizzio.it/pdf/2008-pag144-161-verde-acqua.pdfthere are (at the bottom) of the flanged valves that have precisely the flange from dn 100 and diameter 175.

Is there a counterflangia, if not, like the fixed ones?? :finger:
Hi.

 

[Exatem]

this research has impassioned me ....... and in these 2 links:
http://www.rizzio.it/pdf/2008-pag066-089-grigio.pdfhttp://www.rizzio.it/pdf/2008-pag144-161-verde-acqua.pdfthere are (at the bottom) of the flanged valves that have precisely the flange from dn 100 and diameter 175.

Is there a counterflangia, if not, like the fixed ones? ?
Hi.

the more you go on research, the more you grow in me a sense of frustration. ..frown:
Why did my (I assure you long) internet searches not bring any results?
that you have a better google than mine?
do you enjoy special privileges that I am denied?

Well, I'm gonna call you "personal reaper"
Bye. :finger:

 

[numero1]

But no, I don't think that you have a better google than yours. .
It's true that most of the research I did from home where I have no limits, but e.g. in many sites I can't connect critical cause of the network, while from the office I don't have this problem.
On the other hand, I find myself getting access to many forums and/or sites that could potentially be interesting and (hopefully) resolvers.
I just think I give better terms at the beginning on the search engine, to have a search + refined and precise.
however in time lost proseguo......
but is it not that the norms quoted in those valves are exactly what they serve??? ?
You're the expert.
Hi.

 

[numero1]

by the way, thanks for the appointment :biggrin: but I will be able to dedicate (violently) a few more hours this week and, perhaps, on the week.
always if the consort does not call:tongue:
Hi.

edit:
Let go of frustration

 

[Exatem]

But no, I don't think that you have a better google than yours. .
It's true that most of the research I did from home where I have no limits, but e.g. in many sites I can't connect critical cause of the network, while from the office I don't have this problem.
On the other hand, I find myself getting access to many forums and/or sites that could potentially be interesting and (hopefully) resolvers.
I just think I give better terms at the beginning on the search engine, to have a search + refined and precise.
however in time lost proseguo......
but is it not that the norms quoted in those valves are exactly what they serve??? ?
You're the expert.
Hi.

Now I'm in vacation and I'm in the mountains. I can connect occasionally and with the key that often does the bizze so I couldn't fully open the catalogs that you linked me. I'll do it when I get home and then I'll tell you. I also attach you part of the board that generated this 3ad so you can see the origin of everything.
I have a lot of restrictions in my office too.
He thinks that often in order to download a catalogue, I have to wait to go home. On the other hand, we head to a corporate network and internet access takes place through a central server to which a "black list" of unnecessary sites is connected.
for example facebook is absolutely precluded (and I agree, I do not dare to imagine how many people would spend office time looking for friends).

by the way, thanks for the appointment :biggrin: but I will be able to dedicate (violently) a few more hours this week and, perhaps, on the week.
always if the consort does not call
Hi.

edit:
Let go of frustration

the appointment is irreversible and has immediate effect.:mixed:
the wife will have to aim, resign.:biggrin:

 

[numero1]

?
http://store.uni.com/magento-1.4.0.1/index.php/uni-1629-1921.html#it was made available and withdrawn on the same day of 1921 but then in 1942

Boh? ?
Are there any explanations about this?? and then there is no pdf.
I ran out of my cartridges.

Hi.

 

[numero1]

then it is this but... It is not this:
http://static.gest.unipd.it/eserciz...i_2282-67_flange_metalliche_per_tubazioni.pdfI explain better, although not she in the left edge of the first page there are 2 vertical annotations (one up and one down) interesting moooooooolto.

of +, on the last page reference is made to the naval technical commission of the unit and to the
ratified the unification of 1942.

Hi.

 

[numero1]

then we summarize:

1) is a rule of 1921 that is born and dies on the same day, mystery?
2) is unified in 1942, but if she died in 21 what is unified?
3) should be (conditional is obligatory) the erased in 2010 or 2011 as from post n° 12
4) from the previous post to this one shows that it is that...... that is then became 22... etc. etc. as exatem wrote in the first post.

personal conclusions and assumptions:

1) after the war there was a mess, the norm in question became the 22... something, on which date between June 66 and October 67.
2) However, they did not officially withdraw 1629, which was only recently done as from post no. 12
3) when they informed the aun they gave 2 dates to papocchio to justify the birth/disappearance of that norm

and this is how...
what is missing (and that is not found) is a pdf, a document, a link between 1942/43 and 1966/1967.
is there a reconstruction of the facts?

Hi.

 

[Exatem]

the question, under the technical wait, has been resolved.
it has decided, considering that the flange uni 1629 no longer exist, to realize two adapters/reductions, one on the mouth of aspiration and one on the one of mandata, and two flanges of coupling with the existing ones.

the explanation of number1 on the disappearance of this rule is plausible if one considers the chaos of the immediate post-war period and the years to follow.

I will post a render of the adopted solution.

Thank you number1 and all those who have collaborated for the help.

 

[numero1]

thanks to you for the opportunity:finger:
Hi.

p.s.
I don't know creo, but it should be the old pro-e right?
good luck:smile:

 

[Exatem]

thanks to you for the opportunity:finger:
Hi.

p.s.
I don't know creo, but it should be the old pro-e right?
good luck:smile:

Yes, it's the former pro-e.

I attach the rendering I had announced.
reductions are those in gold.

 

[numero1]

But that render is already done with creo?