flexibility (create type)

[Marco Mazzocchi]

Is there a way to have flexibility like a creo?
For example, a spring that is 100 long I can insert it in many different assemblies and change it (only for that aid crushing), or if the bond to a fixed flange and a furniture can crush it according to how much I move the flange mobile. clearly when I open the original design the spring is 100 long

Is there something like that?

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

constraints the sketch or function of the part within the axieme. but don't expect a real-time change, you'll need to update the axieme every time

 

[Marco Mazzocchi]

to update the aid would absolutely not be a problem..
But I don't understand, if my spring is 100 long and the distance between the flanges is 70, if the bond gives me error, the spring should I draw it in a particular way?

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I wrote that you have to bind the sketch or function within the axieme which means that the length of the spring must be related to a component of the axieme by equation, sketch or other.

 

[Marco Mazzocchi]

So how can I make the spring board? If I don't give him a length in the sketch?
and the same spring in 2 different assemblies (with different distances)?

reading on the net seems to need to create the spring inside the axieme.. .

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

semantic clarification:
If you write a table it is natural to understand that you refer to the drawing or drawing or putting into the table with which one or more views listed or otherwise containing the information necessary for the realization of the particular.
said this the question is: can you model using internal references to the axieme?
then we must consider that there are n soluzioni per n obbiettivi per n Modeling and assembly settings.
so blindly tell you: inside the axieme to double click on the portion of the spring length (so of the part) and write = instead of the existing value (without closing the editor price window), double-click the distance coupling in the axieme between the components that receive the spring and select the quota. confirm and close the editor window. to change the distance of the parts of the assembly by updating the latter will also change the length of the spring.

 

[Marco Mazzocchi]

by table in fact I mean the table of the drawing, the quoted design.
The example you've made me, I want to change the original .prt. I'm looking for something that doesn't change the original. . .

 

[marcof]

by table in fact I mean the table of the drawing, the quoted design.
The example you've made me, I want to change the original .prt. I'm looking for something that doesn't change the original. . .

make a spring whose length and defined by an axial sketch line. create two configurations of the spring, one with the active 100mm quota, which is what I would use for the table (if I understood correctly) and the other in which the quota is suspended and that I would use in the axieme by binding the sketch line to the geometry that detrminates from time to time the length. then verify that the external references of the sketch are suspended in the table configuration so that they do not conflict with the share.
I am going to arm without even open swx but in this way or its variant I think you should succeed without problems. In essence, you have to have references to the axieme that you then suspend and replace with a quota that is reactivated. may serve two sketches instead of one but I'm sure it works.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

The example you've made me, I want to change the original .prt.

Of course it changes the part. is the design that is a consequence of the part not the contrary.

I'm looking for something that doesn't change the original. . .

then use the design environment as autocad and drawings without creating the model.

 

[Marco Mazzocchi]

Of course it changes the part. is the design that is a consequence of the part not the contrary.

And all right, in fact, I would need a limited modification to the aid. flexibility.

then use the design environment as autocad and drawings without creating the model.

so if hypothetically in my original spring I change the amount of spires, in the assemblies where it is inserted you do not see the change.. .

thanks for the help, but I think that simply a truly flexible method does not exist, as long as it has to create configurations as it has assumed marcof. would be a solution however limited to a single set, because if the hypothetical leaves the port in 2 assemblies with two different lengths, one of the two sets will go wrong or will not update