MARCOO
Guest
Good morning to all, I am beginner pro and , I need to diversify the fold lines "fold up" and "piega giu" . how do you make this change? can be made automatically in the configuration ? Thank you.
- Home
- Forums
- mechanical engineering
- creo parametric (ex pro/e)
- creo parametric - modeling of parts and sheet
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
DANI-3D
Guest
Riciao
I hope to be wrong... but I think you can't do it, even because if you use show annotation model it turns out all clearer. you can see the angle and arrows indicating the direction of the fold.
I hope to be wrong... but I think you can't do it, even because if you use show annotation model it turns out all clearer. you can see the angle and arrows indicating the direction of the fold.
MARCOO
Guest
Okay, grazie.Riciao
I hope to be wrong... but I think you can't do it, even because if you use show annotation model it turns out all clearer. you can see the angle and arrows indicating the direction of the fold.
marco
MARCOO
Guest
someone tells me you should be able to do it also because at the level of representation drw it seems important to me the diversification of the type of fold .
the drw should report, even without a view of the 3d model, how to build the piece.
any one of you who works in sheet metal as does this differentiation ( fold up, fold down) ?
thanks to all
the drw should report, even without a view of the 3d model, how to build the piece.
any one of you who works in sheet metal as does this differentiation ( fold up, fold down) ?
thanks to all
320i S
Guest
Premetto, this is a topic I dealt with at the time of 2000i2 and wildfire 1, so I talk to you about 2004-2005 and water under the bridges passed...for all... ("all" meant me and the cad...).
drw only shows the bending table that must be predisposed in 3d appointing the piege.
If you need to make a drawing with bending process, you should also create a family table in which you activate via the piege and indicate them in drawing.
I think there was the package that automatically creates these views, I don't know if it was implemented, because personally I always made the design of construction/design, not process.
drw only shows the bending table that must be predisposed in 3d appointing the piege.
If you need to make a drawing with bending process, you should also create a family table in which you activate via the piege and indicate them in drawing.
I think there was the package that automatically creates these views, I don't know if it was implemented, because personally I always made the design of construction/design, not process.
MARCOO
Guest
Unfortunately, I have a client who asks me that type of mode of representation of the drawings ( fold up, fold down in the explained ) , perhaps there is a specific package for this application , I don't know, I have to settle it somehow.
320i S
Guest
and propose the design with folds managed in family table?, in front of a few minutes work (depending on the number of obvious folds) you still have a valid, even less automatic.
MARCOO
Guest
It's a matter of corporate internal unification...
Let's see if we can make him change his mind.
but in the meantime I have to find a solution with this type of standardization.
I ask you if anyone knows...
Thank you very much
Let's see if we can make him change his mind.
but in the meantime I have to find a solution with this type of standardization.
I ask you if anyone knows...
Thank you very much
gianniturbina
Guest
hello to all; I also have this problem;
we say that the tract/tract and the tract/point is the bending language in a workshop;
If you have found the solution to have diversification, please post it because for me this is a huge limit.
Now I am making the tables with sw to be able to supply tables quoted properly to the bending department... intolerable in the long term.
inserting notes on/down is a little readable system in the workshop, on details with many folds and maybe very close.
Thank you all.
we say that the tract/tract and the tract/point is the bending language in a workshop;
If you have found the solution to have diversification, please post it because for me this is a huge limit.
Now I am making the tables with sw to be able to supply tables quoted properly to the bending department... intolerable in the long term.
inserting notes on/down is a little readable system in the workshop, on details with many folds and maybe very close.
Thank you all.
320i S
Guest
the style of line in the design you can change it at will, but it is something manual and has all its limits and sincerely in 2019 there are well other specific tools. . .hello to all; I also have this problem;
we say that the tract/tract and the tract/point is the bending language in a workshop;
If you have found the solution to have diversification, please post it because for me this is a huge limit.
Now I am making the tables with sw to be able to supply tables quoted properly to the bending department... intolerable in the long term.
inserting notes on/down is a little readable system in the workshop, on details with many folds and maybe very close.
Thank you all.
in the time that came from my last answer to this thread, I began to use a special cam for bending machine according to industry 4.0.
I have to say that "spending time" to prepare a table for the bending department in the old way, is really obsolete, by now these cams manage everything, loading the 3d model, ordering for themselves the sequence of folds, managing the database tools present, all with interface 3d also on board machine.