fold to degrees

[andreaf93]

Good evening to all,
best wishes for the various holidays of this period.
the problem that I find is not able to find the correct parallel between two sheets. I have two details together.
including the "secondary" code is diagonally inserted to the main code. Obviously making the second fold in the "secondary" code I need the second bending to bring me the particular parallel to the main code. as you can find in the attached photos I find a difference of 2.91°. If I add or remove 2.91° to the current degrees that give me the current inclination of the flange I do not find in 0° and 5.82 (2.91x2) at the time of measuring the two floors.
Unfortunately I cannot attach the project in the event of not making the idea I can draw new details that recreate the same situation.

Thank you very much.

 

[meccanicamg]

Main and secondary code? What language is it?

 

[balotta_cocogena]

but not to should it generate the components with the sole sketch?
Sorry but from mobile I can't view the pictures.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

without file it is practically impossible to give an answer that solves the problem.
you are talking about a couple together that you do not know how it is handled, two parts (not codes that looks like a bureaucratic language) that you do not know how they are made or that functions have been used.
that of miracles has already given last week

 

[andreaf93]

View attachment DOMANDA.rarI attach together that reproduces the situation described.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

You're shaping like crap. parts with underfinished sketches, without quotas and constraints; together with parts without couplings. even if it is an example of the original project must be well done and you have to give all the information otherwise you can not understand where you are wrong.
if the two parts have external references that bind their geometry and this part/axieme is not present, nothing can be done to understand what causes non parallelism; in fact interrupting external references the coupling succeeds without problems.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

it is also necessary to say that the two faces that melt on two floors and not only one so you cannot get parallelism by changing only the corner of the fold

 

[andreaf93]

it is also necessary to say that the two faces that melt on two floors and not only one so you cannot get parallelism by changing only the corner of the fold

I solved, it was too much mating that didn't allow me to have parallelism. I take advantage of it to ask for another thing:

if you look at the image where I mix the angle between the edge and the face notice a angle of 0.02° going to vary the share of the second image i.e. 74.06° you change the quota from 0.02 respectively.
However, I can't take her to be 0.00°.

What do you think I should do? In case I attach the file.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I solved, it was too much mating that didn't allow me to have parallelism.

Well, that's not about the problem.

and look at the image where I mix the angle between the edge and the face notice a corner of 0.02° going to vary the share of the second image i.e. 74.06° changes the quota from 0.02 respectively.
However, I can't take her to be 0.00°.

You mean there's someone who makes you a hundredth-century sheet? and someone else who stands on a 0.02° error?
and what is the relationship between that 74 and 0.02? and what functions to change are there in the various parts? and how are the parts coupled?
you're less stringing the sheet at the same time than making calculations

 

[andreaf93]

Well, that's not about the problem.



You mean there's someone who makes you a hundredth-century sheet? and someone else who stands on a 0.02° error?
and what is the relationship between that 74 and 0.02? and what functions to change are there in the various parts? and how are the parts coupled?
you're less stringing the sheet at the same time than making calculations

Surely in the construction phase the 0.02° do not affect the production of the particular, it was only a discourse in principle to arrive at 0.00°. However the selected particular green has only one coupling with tilted sheet which in turn is a single part with various folds.
However if you say that in the design phase 0.02° is a passable " error" is fine.
and the sloping sheet is a single part.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I know that it is a principle speech and that the utopian model is made utopianly perfect with parallelisms, concentricity and other perfect; but if you are making a sheet with gradients of grade cents to have this imaginary perfection maybe there is some weak point in design.
in reality those plates probably straighten them and put them to team with a nice dose of hammered
I hope you understand that with three images, with the same perspective among others, it is not possible to understand how where there is that problem.
the quickest and painless thing as I wrote and make a cut with contextual sketch