fresature in sottol

[monster]

Hey, guys.

I'm looking for a solution to the problem of being able to get in with a disc braid undercut having a system 3 axes and not 5 axes!! !

once you create the procedures this tells me that the system does not take into account the
tool for which once out of the vetical tangence he drops to normal and there is no way to make the subsquadro

I tried with the multiaxis adv. you a huge mess since I duto change normal but I don't know just how to handle it is what

Any idea?

 

[Mould Inventor]

I don't know if I understood the problem, but one thing like that I did using a mill with a diameter of a nominal, for example 30mm, and then mounting a machine with a diameter greater, for example 40mm.
I don't know if I can break up.

 

[cimaguy]

Hi.

can be managed using the adv multi-axis (see morph between 2 curves)

but one should understand what kind of work it is.

time ago I solved a similar problem with the morph.

 

[monster]

I don't know if I understand the problem

....in fact you did not understand the problem in () brackets
to make a cam with a x-brake and ride a car y...from my parts means not to have understood a tube... risking to create collisions
I stop here and I'm not saying anything else.

Hi.

can be managed using the adv multi-axis (see morph between 2 curves)

you are right I used it for the first time but nothing to do I had to call also dylan on the phone to know if there was a soluziona in fact told me to try but nothing to do

but one should understand what kind of work it is.

I have to fresare with a fresa d100x12xr2.5 channel of a circle for scooter
I also tried with isoparametrics but nothing good...here
This applies to those who like me self-taught and without courses:frown:

I could even send the file to whom it is interested is about 35 mega v8.5

 

[stinit]

....in fact you did not understand the problem in () brackets
to make a cam with a x-brake and ride a car y...from my parts means not to have understood a tube... risking to create collisions
I stop here and I'm not saying anything else.



you are right I used it for the first time but nothing to do I had to call also dylan on the phone to know if there was a soluziona in fact told me to try but nothing to do



I have to fresare with a fresa d100x12xr2.5 channel of a circle for scooter
I also tried with isoparametrics but nothing good...here
This applies to those who like me self-taught and without courses:frown:

I could even send the file to whom it is interested is about 35 mega v8.5

...unfortunately such work is a nice problem...by cam you could use 2d machining and then go to give it a fictitious size of the tool to "fresh" the cam and do the processing anyway. . .

I usually robe like that I solve them on board the car with the selca that as control is haunting!! !

 

[monster]

: smile: grazie stinit

I usually robe like that I solve them on board the car with the selca that as control is haunting!! !

dylan had explained this thing to me about the selca... but I don't want to go on the car and make fools that I already have an avalanche to do if I go with the selca I want to fire myself

 

[Mould Inventor]

...unfortunately such work is a nice problem...by cam you could use 2d machining and then go to give it a fictitious size of the tool to "fresh" the cam and do the processing anyway. . .

I'm sorry to bother you, but what do you mean by "and then go give it a fictitious size of the tool"?

thanks in advance.

 

[cimaguy]

Monster,

If you want, I can try to help you. (maybe if you make me have the file a little reduced as size).
I insist that the solution to the problem is using the morph command.
I know that this technique can seem messed up and sometimes you see the fresa
that makes absurd and rapid turns crazy but if used as it must be
offers remarkable results.

Hi.

 

[monster]

:smile:

I'm sorry to bother you, but what do you mean by "and then go give it a fictitious size of the tool"?

means doing a procedure with a tool given x that once known y
you go to do what you want but all this has to be well calculated knowing what you go to do... You know that if you cut an electrode with flat cutters and negative offsets tell you that it can't do the calculation but you have to use a torica

..so giving a lower cut diameter in the cam and using a calculated cutter
You can "enge" so you can say, and remove that offset that didn't allow you to do it... or if you have to make a semi-finish of the funds without touching the walls from a larger cut of the offet you overmetal left and lower the origin of so much that you need to do the processing ....

But these things were done when the cams for various reasons did not allow you to create procedures with various offsets.. .

today we have new technologies in my case I understand that toptron tells me
"ohhh tega, look, I don't take responsibility for what you do."
But I demand a command that allows me to escape this limitation
I think I'm safe. .

 

[Dylan]

as I already told you. .
make a maximail, gigamail or something. .
As soon as I have 2 minutes I look at it.

dylan

 

[arturo c]

I don't know if I understood the problem, but one thing like that I did using a mill with a diameter of a nominal, for example 30mm, and then mounting a machine with a diameter greater, for example 40mm.
I don't know if I can break up.

means doing a procedure with a tool given x that once known y
you go to do what you want but all this has to be well calculated knowing what you go to do... You know that if you cut an electrode with flat cutters and negative offsets tell you that it can't do the calculation but you have to use a torica

..so giving a lower cut diameter in the cam and using a calculated cutter
You can "enge" so you can say, and remove that offset that didn't allow you to do it... or if you have to make a semi-finish of the funds without touching the walls from a larger cut of the offet you overmetal left and lower the origin of so much that you need to do the processing ....

But these things were done when the cams for various reasons did not allow you to create procedures with various offsets.. .

today we have new technologies in my case I understand that toptron tells me
"ohhh tega, look, I don't take responsibility for what you do."
But I demand a command that allows me to escape this limitation
I think I'm safe. .

I want to know what's the difference between the two statements?
above all would I like the opinion of the moderator?

 

[Er Presidente]

I want to know what's the difference between the two statements?
above all would I like the opinion of the moderator?

What kind of advice?
the posts you linked are very technical and do not appear, at first sight, necessary for moderation intervention.