Vittorio
Guest
certainly illegal or legal. for this better control the future contract and above all make comparison with the previous one.but we are talking about things at least border line, if not clearly illegal
12% more increase is a moment.
certainly illegal or legal. for this better control the future contract and above all make comparison with the previous one.but we are talking about things at least border line, if not clearly illegal
Sorry last consideration.In my view, to this day, to assess a job because perhaps in the future it could give us a greater pension is a mistake, especially if we talk about a young person
I would also prefer it, but unfortunately who governs us is going definitely, indeed it has already gone, in the opposite directionSorry last consideration.
It is the classic mistake that we have made almost all even in less suspicious times.
when you are young a time span of 30 years seems eternal, but if you are lucky to get there and especially in good health... You realize that the scar theory was not so wise.
I prefer a pension system run by the state (we) rather than private.
Let's do the optimists.I would also prefer it, but unfortunately who governs us is going definitely, indeed it has already gone, in the opposite direction
I think I'll die of old age before I see her. .However, I agree with the fact that retirement is no longer necessary to think about it. We don't even know if we're gonna take her...
14th is no longer, at the same time as those with 14th monthly will take less than those with 13 monthly.[...] but remain the many kilometers less and the fourteenth more. [...]
you are perfectly right but often you talk about net monthly (the heral is known by few) so the fourteenth makes the difference.14th is no longer, at the same time as those with 14th monthly will take less than those with 13 monthly.
I don't know why but this fact of the 14th, as if it were something more, is common use.
to compare increases or other you have to reason in terms of ral.