front-stop lamb

[gianlucap]

hello to all, I should perform a fold as an attached drawing where I have a 1000 long sheet and I have to run this throat 200mm from sheet board.
the throat must be 10x45°, can it be done in a single passage and then see automatically how ironed the sheet from the 1000th departure?

 

[Tarkus]

hello to all, I should perform a fold as an attached drawing where I have a 1000 long sheet and I have to run this throat 200mm from sheet board.
the throat must be 10x45°, can it be done in a single passage and then see automatically how ironed the sheet from the 1000th departure?

I don't see the problem.
you draw the profile sketch of your sheet, then "flangia contour", -> flat model and you mix the development.......... .

 

[gianlucap]

I don't see the problem.
you draw the profile sketch of your sheet, then "flangia contour", -> flat model and you mix the development.......... .

to me does not come with only one operation to perform such a throat!
Can you give me a tip?

 

[Tarkus]

Look at this, see how long the flat model is, and so you know how long a throat like that you drew, so you know how much it's gonna happen to you if you've got a sheet of size that's already set.

 

[gianlucap]

I can't open it, unfortunately I arrive until 2009
Can you confirm that you can do that throat with just one workmanship?
Thank you.

 

[Tarkus]

I can't open it, unfortunately I arrive until 2009
Can you confirm that you can do that throat with just one workmanship?
Thank you.

Of course, but insist on talking about "work". What do you mean? if you want to do 2 folds with the "piega" command (the sketch) with only one operation, it doesn't seem possible, I instead created all the sheet by making a sketch of the profile, including throat.

p.s. is very witty and cute to indicate your software in a partial way, or with imaginative names or even at nothing, as many do, but you find yourself having examples in versions that you cannot open, losing all uselessly time.
a tip: clearly indicate the vs.software.......for other data do as well as what you want.

 

[lollo3d]

but what is the throat with the development of the sheet? I don't know what you need. .

 

[Tarkus]

but what is the throat with the development of the sheet? I don't know what you need. .

Why, how did you realize this piece is done?

 

[Tarkus]

I understood it like this:
and anyway I did it in 2009

 

[gianlucap]

Of course, but insist on talking about "work". What do you mean? if you want to do 2 folds with the "piega" command (the sketch) with only one operation, it doesn't seem possible, I instead created all the sheet by making a sketch of the profile, including throat.

p.s. is very witty and cute to indicate your software in a partial way, or with imaginative names or even at nothing, as many do, but you find yourself having examples in versions that you cannot open, losing all uselessly time.
a tip: clearly indicate the vs.software.......for other data do as well as what you want.

I did not want (even if I had to do so for reasons of time) to create the whole already from the sketch, but to know if with the fold command or other if there was a possibility to create this throat with only one processing.
I'll explain a little better. the person who bends the plates says he has a quarry and a blade where he can get a throat on the sheet just as you have drawn simply with one operation.
I wanted to know if inventor had "in sheet" such a function that is to run this throat simply with one operation without performing flanges or simply drawing it already from the sketch!

tarkus I apologize and you're perfectly right!
I thank you again and I apologize if I have given you time

 

[Tarkus]

I did not want (although then I had to do so for reasons of time) to create the whole already from the sketch, but to know if with the fold command or other if there was a chance to create this throat with only one

tarkus I apologize and you're perfectly right!
I thank you again and I apologize if I have given you time

No, no, for charity, there is no need for any excuse, it was just to reiterate that if you know what version has a question, you first respond (of course who knows and who can).
However, returning to your problem, I don't think that you can simulate exactly the withdrawal of the sheet on a fold obtained with a mold from "one barrel"
It is not exactly the same as 2 folds as they will compete with other ribbing forces, (of course there is a small component of ironing of the sheet).
I think they're minimal differences than what makes you see inventor.
But can't you make a bending test from your bending machine?

 

[gianlucap]

No, no, for charity, there is no need for any excuse, it was just to reiterate that if you know what version has a question, you first respond (of course who knows and who can).
However, returning to your problem, I don't think that you can simulate exactly the withdrawal of the sheet on a fold obtained with a mold from "one barrel"
It is not exactly the same as 2 folds as they will compete with other ribbing forces, (of course there is a small component of ironing of the sheet).
I think they're minimal differences than what makes you see inventor.
But can't you make a bending test from your bending machine?

the bending test makes it so that I can detect the various ironings, I would have been useful if inventor had such a function but sometimes it asks too much!
I asked for this because the processing can be undertaken about as a punching, only that instead of removing material you go to create a shape on a sheet, and knowing that the punching command there is hoped even in such a thing, I hope to have made the idea!!!
Thank you again for your availability