function "update"

[Dador]

Good morning to all!!!!

I am going to ask a question whose answer could be very generalized. I ask only if you can list a series of good habits to overcome the problem that I will explain below. :tongue:


when I create details and overall with the respective tables, at first everything well. after a few weeks it almost always happens that if I open some of these tables, I will be asked if to update the view (grey square around the object).


I work like this:

1) I create details with the mode "subvinculated profiles" (red card) active, so as to bind each particular.

2) I create the total by obviously binding all the details and making the view exploded.

3) I create the table of details by inserting the objects in question in the sheet and listing it.

4) I create the overall table by inserting in the sheet the total explosive and the whole one with the list of parts.


very simple therefore, but it is not enough, I would like to use the "upon" button much less frequently.
n.b.: we do not use any plm or similar in the company.

Thank you!

 

[Tequila]

Good morning to all!!!!

I am going to ask a question whose answer could be very generalized. I ask only if you can list a series of good habits to overcome the problem that I will explain below. ...

Thank you!

I often happen to myself and I can't understand why, if I make an asm today and put it on the table all right, if after 2-3 days I reopen it without touching any files of this together tells me that it is old date and should be updated, even if the update does not produce the very least modification.

I don't know if it depends on some setting of time it spends since the file was closed and saved at a time after it reopens.... boh! !

Hi.

 

[Be_on_edge]

I often happen to myself and I can't understand why, if I make an asm today and put it on the table all right, if after 2-3 days I reopen it without touching any files of this together tells me that it is old date and should be updated, even if the update does not produce the very least modification.

I don't know if it depends on some setting of time it spends since the file was closed and saved at a time after it reopens.... boh! !

Hi.

before upgrading, check the component rescue dates, you will notice that at least one has been saved in the meantime. you can also use the "design view location" tool to check what the incriminated file is.

Hi.

 

[Tequila]

before upgrading, check the component rescue dates, you will notice that at least one has been saved in the meantime. you can also use the "design view location" tool to check what the incriminated file is.

Hi.

This is also done...not written for forgetfulness but I also use the tracker view design. what I sometimes don't understand is that in certain pwds during updates (usually connections and physical properties) just in physical properties I go to lose the connection to the material and asks me to insert it and climb it back into the file... although there! !

 

[Be_on_edge]

This is also done...not written for forgetfulness but I also use the tracker view design. what I sometimes don't understand is that in certain pwds during updates (usually connections and physical properties) just in physical properties I go to lose the connection to the material and asks me to insert it and climb it back into the file... although there! !

since introduced the welding environment into asm the pwd has been abandoned and probably takes behind old bugs.

I never use these environments so I can't help you anymore.

Hi.