eboss
Guest
Obviously that component has functions with constraints or quotas made on another set.
do dx button on the part you are editing and checking (elect external references)
You see the reports. . .
then if you want a brutal by-pass "not a correct solution" can be to interrupt references.
re_solidworks
Guest
or you can activate multiple contexts in options, but in my opinion it is very dangerous.
Hi.
eboss
Guest
It would be necessary to differentiate the common pieces that models from those specific to that axieme.
if you create a part with references in a set (x) and then use it on the axieme
- (z) - (w) will always happen to you.
I recommend in this case to create and shape the part individually and then insert it into the assemblies where you need it.
if you create a part with references in a set (x) and then use it on the axieme
- (z) - (w) will always happen to you.I recommend in this case to create and shape the part individually and then insert it into the assemblies where you need it.
solokite
Guest
we say that I modeled the part in the axieme x, then I saved by name the axieme(we hypothesize name y) then I open y (x closes automatically obviously) I opened the part in object and I also saved it by name.It would be necessary to differentiate the common pieces that models from those specific to that axieme.
if you create a part with references in a set (x) and then use it on the axieme
I recommend in this case to create and shape the part individually and then insert it into the assemblies where you need it.
Here, after this tyra should not create references related to the axieme y and not + on that x? correct me if I'm wrong
eboss
Guest
Did you save the copy?
If I know you'd better duplicate it via pack & go if you don't have a pdm.
so you solve the problems of references.
solokite
Guest
no I did not save as a copy, because I avoided manually replacing the component(for laziness)..I had to make a pack&go..dici that is the best solution?
eboss
Guest
If you don't have a pdm, I feel like I say yes...