MassiVonWeizen
Guest
I think the third datum can be put to have control along the hole axis,
What do you think?
returning to this statement, these days I am processing for the production of many designs of an external customer in which there are caregivers of localization tolerances.Yes, it could be. I would prefer to put a datum on the surface and a tolerance of perpendicularity on the axis
actually many of these also have the datum reported to the perpendicular surface to the axis (the c of the drawing @since 1996, to make the concept more immediate); As we talk about drawings that for most are carter and sheet metal to me it seems that putting a tolerance 0.2 on a thickness of 2/3mm is a stupid thing that complicates the design because I think it is impossible also to pierce as you can drill with a inclination so as not to respect tolerance.
We also talk about screw housing holes that already have the hole with a lot of game compared to the screw to be inserted, or mounting thread inserts that align with the flatness of the surfaces.
the speech is different if we talk about important thicknesses (>10mm according to me) with tight couplings.