"genuity"

[Aripug]

Hello, everyone!
excuse the question, but I wanted to know if there is a way to understand the genuineness of the provided files, drawn into solidworks.
can you see from saves, if the solidworks that was used to create that file is equipped with regular license or if it is a pirate copy or student (not usable for commercial purposes)?
Moreover I wanted to ask if in a set created with sw regularly fired, I insert parts provided by third parties with sw not regularly fired, will I have problems?
I ask why knowing about the history of solidedge I wanted to know if with solidworks can happen the same.
Thank you.

 

[cacciatorino]

Hello, everyone!
excuse the question, but I wanted to know if there is a way to understand the genuineness of the provided files, drawn into solidworks.

the files created with academic versions recognize them because they appear in the axieme tree with a particular icon: The university student hat uses!

regarding files created with pirate licenses I don't know, you could take a ride on eng-tips to see if the problem was verified by other users.

 

[SolidUser]

control over pirate files in solidworks does not exist.
is based on the internet, so to download the software, update it and transfer licenses you must have an internet connection that checks that the license code is in their database and that it is in maintenance.
Maybe an internal tool, even vars can have it.
since 1996 no topic in this regard.
therefore between the two cads have vision on the controls of opposite licenses.

 

[Aripug]

Thank you very much to both for the answer.
So, if I didn't get it wrong, if one uses a solidworks with unregular license, he can work using his files quietly.
different speech for the student version that "mark" with the cap its files.

 

[Matteo]

Thank you very much to both for the answer.
So, if I didn't get it wrong, if one uses a solidworks with unregular license, he can work using his files quietly.
different speech for the student version that "mark" with the cap its files.

"tranquillously" to some point. legal discourses aside, I think dassult policy is correct: the software circulates quite freely (but I repeat: always illegally), but if you are not in maintenance it is very difficult to solve bugs and have servicepacks.. consider that the sp0 versions of swx are very zopppicaneti traditionally. so: if you are not regular and use swx to learn it or import goemtria less you wash (if you do not get caught). If you have to make a professional use in practice you cannot not have an original license.

 

[Aripug]

the legal speech, the speech of dassault politics and the speech of service packs are absolutely in agreement.
my question was however referred to the fact if sw not regularly fired, generates files, through the rescues, that "evidence" his "irregularity" as it does solidedge.

 

[Matteo]

the legal speech, the speech of dassault politics and the speech of service packs are absolutely in agreement.
my question was however referred to the fact if sw not regularly fired, generates files, through the rescues, that "evidence" his "irregularity" as it does solidedge.

I'd say no. also because when you install swx it is like you have a "floating" license on the web.

 

[cacciatorino]

If you have to make a professional use in practice you cannot not have an original license.

ot:
apart from I have seen users working with pirate licenses and billing regularly to customers....

There's the problem that if your maintenance contract expires as soon as the sp0 is out, you have no right to have the release sp you purchased. practically swx corp. He wants money to give you the cad, and more money to give you corrections of their mistakes.

I would like to see if the fiat cheid of money to correct design/manufacture errors.

 

[Matteo]

ot:
apart from I have seen users working with pirate licenses and billing regularly to customers....

There's the problem that if your maintenance contract expires as soon as the sp0 is out, you have no right to have the release sp you purchased. practically swx corp. He wants money to give you the cad, and more money to give you corrections of their mistakes.

I would like to see if the fiat cheid of money to correct design/manufacture errors.

this is true, it would be very disadvantageous to the user.
I have to say that my business has been very correct on this thing, making it present and "drawing" a suitable moment for the start of maintenance. I am still of the idea of renewing always (for the basic license will be less than 200€/year to post and a posting makes me more than 2000€/h fortunately).

ps: for those who work and invoice with a sp0 pirated... boh according to me the incorrectness is not so much towards dassault, but towards the customer who receives a service to "risk" (the bugs are present and annoying also in the next sp0, let alone with the sp0!)

 

[cacciatorino]

I am still of the idea of renewing always (for the basic license will be less than 200€/year to post and a posting makes me more than 2000€/h fortunately).

I currently have to manage solid edge, solidworks and osd modeling. You understand that paying for everyone....

ps: for those who work and invoice with a sp0 pirated... boh according to me the incorrectness is not so much towards dassault, but towards the customer who receives a service to "risk" (the bugs are present and annoying also in the next sp0, let alone with the sp0!)

in this world of wolves??? :biggrin:


I think the siemens is good: the block on the files is gone, but if you use pirates, they track you, and after a while you insist they call you and ask you to politely rule. otherwise you understand that if I have to charge on the customer the maintenance rata of the cad, I go out price compared to the competitor that these costs do not support them. . .