gestionale pdm e solidworks

[anny1972]

Hello to all, I look for information about the management pdm tied to solidworks since soon to work I will have to use it and to date from the information received and intercepted I did not understand how to manage the details realized.
below some questions.
1) Is there a manual (with images) on how to manage the pdm management?
2) how are part 3d constructions handled in case of welded constructions (apartments/frames) ?

a thank you from now on for any answer - explanation and examples you can give me.

 

[teseo]

in the solidworks guide there is also that of the pdm obviously I think it appears with its installation. You could find it on the internet.... http://help.solidworks.com/2019/eng...er/c_welcome_to_solidworks_enterprise_pdm.htmfor the second question, I can tell you that nothing changes the management is the usual... but you have many more tools to search for axial parts and subassienas.
if they install it, there should also be a couple of training days included.(I would say necessary to not harm)

Hi.

 

[anny1972]

Thank you.
I ask for the purpose of the construction of the constructions (comparted with commercial and not) welded it is better to use the function part in multibody or are forced to make a whole series of assemblies with couplings, I ask because of the little functions that the assemblies offer me as in the case of intersection of several objects where then I have to remove the work that I do not need (e.g. a trunchetto that interseca a tube or sheet)

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

if you have to weld the part the logic says multibody, except you have special need of welded management.

 

[meccanicamg]

use multibody... It's not an inventor.

 

[anny1972]

use multibody... It's not an inventor.

It's what I think and what I do now, it's just that from the voices that circulate in the office I still don't know how I'll have to set up the works as a result of the change of management.

Thank you.

 

[meccanicamg]

does not depend on the management modeling. ...

 

[anny1972]

It is what I think, but apparently those who have decided to change management have no clear how this function and instead of facilitating the work of the technical office is only complicating it.
We'll see when I finally see the program.
Thanks again

 

[teseo]

if the pdm is that of solidworks, there is no problem.
no change in continuous management as you are doing now (multibody).
If the pdm is different, well excuse but it is the pdm that you have to adapt to your way of modeling and not vice versa....this is the theory obviously then there are .........
Hi.

 

[anny1972]

Thanks I have another question.
if in a multibody I add a part (file external part ex commercial trunchetto l=xxx) with "insert part" because I need these to be part of my body intersecting and then submit it to a workmanship (intersect or divide) to eliminate the part of the body that I do not need the pdm is able to handle it or replenish it?
Moreover if I change the part inserted the change that I go to do reperquote on the library file of the "commercial" part?
I ask you because the external study that recommended us the management says that a multibody is not managed this way.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I don't understand that.
not being a combination all functions done in the environment part on imported parts are not reported on the original part.
I don't know if it has to do with the pdm, but when you import a part in one part you can either take yourself behind the properties of the inserted part.

I know I'm polemical, but wouldn't it be the case that you interfaced with someone who runs the pdm with a thorough knowledge of the software?

 

[anny1972]

thank you endless now I have much more material to ask questions for when you will make the change of management

 

[meccanicamg]

does not depend on the pdm. Let's put it in mind that solidworks is a cad while a pdm manages files.... therefore each product does its work independently.

 

[gianniturbina]

It's what I think and what I do now, it's just that from the voices that circulate in the office I still don't know how I'll have to set up the works as a result of the change of management.

I introduce myself because (unfortunately) is a part of the services that offers our company simultaneously to the introduction of sw+gestionale.
the answer to the question depends a lot on the management that wants to do the company:
if you want to make automatic the complete process of exporting diba sw to management diba, you will have to associate any part to a code; this because to each element (also two pieces of tubular cut to 45° and welded) will correspond a code and a relative size for the automatic discharge of the warehouse (linked to the management); this will involve a second, very important setting, that of the conversion of the unit of measurement (mm/kg etc.).
Sometimes, due to the question of flexibility/speed execution of technical documentation, you choose the semi-automatic export road; i.e. sw exports a diba that is then modified (e.g. for multi-body parts) manually by an operator;
there is to say that, speaking of multibody part, with the new versions of sw, it is possible to associate with the properties of each element, a code and a different raw material.
I think it is not a problem in the future; now as now, we can't manage the properties of the files ( sw parts) above the first level (the properties of the individual body in one part, are a lower level of the file properties); in a few words, the log file that is exported by sw and imported into the management, fishing the properties of the file and not the sw;

if in a multibody I add a part (file external part ex commercial trunchetto l=xxx) with "insert part" because I need these to be part of my body intersecting and then submit it to a workmanship (intersect or divide) to eliminate the part of the body that I do not need the pdm is able to handle it or replenish it?

for the reasons before, if they manage the non-file properties of the part, but of each property of each individual body within the part, yes, it is possible.
I don't know if I've explained and I hope I've helped you.