• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

heavy drawings containing non-deleteable blocks

  • Thread starter Thread starter Piron88
  • Start date Start date
then, d2 is the name autocad allocates to the quota, of course being present cannot be eliminated.
The fact that it appears between the blocks probably, this is my hypothesis, is because the annotation is created by a block similar to the dynamic blocks; this "block" is however contained within the quota and cannot be properly eliminated.
even some terminals of the quotas (the oblique traits) are sometimes blocks; try to set up the oblique terminals and see what the program tells you when you try to do the cleaning.
What version do you have that I've never left that helimin screen?
 
but the main problem comes out of a program that generates dxf on which I then go to work, creates this kind of undeleteable blocks that I had deducted recognize as dynamic blocks, from here the question that I did even last time, but you know what it is said... who question.... from 2019 on then I think there is that new screen.
Thank you for the time you have dedicated me
 
but the main problem comes out of a program that generates dxf on which I then go to work, creates this sort of undeleteable blocks that I had given here the question I even asked last time, but you know what it is said... Who asks... .
from here the answer I gave you:
If they're not as clean as we should help you?
attach the file so we avoid starting to think hypotheses without having any starting data
 
but exploding everything, shouldn't the design weigh down? the blocks always seemed to lighten the design.
I can't say. In fact, by exploding the share, the d2 block is eliminated from the "elimina" command.
at that point you can remake the quota (without annotation, otherwise the block reappears). If the odds are so many then it is no longer worth doing this blast and requota work.

If you want to clean up a drawing to make it a virgin dwt model then the explosion speech can be worth, in the sense that in the dwt (saved as dwt after the explosion and the eliminated command) of departure will not appear that d2 block among the ineliminable listed with the command eliminates.

Otherwise, in a normal design, if that d2 block comes to determine when the annotation applies to the quota then there is no reason to eliminate it.
 
Last edited:
and instead you want to clean a design to make it a virgin dwt model then the explosion speech can be worth, in the sense that in the dwt (saved as dwt after the explosion and the eliminated command) of departure will not appear that d2 block among the ineliminable listed with the command eliminates.
Sorry, I don't understand the meaning. to make a virgin dwt you should delete everything (ctrl+a and canc) and then clean, otherwise only with the explosion the dwt will contain entities that will be present at every new design since the purge eliminates only the dissolved elements with the explosion (in practice an explosive line remains a line and the purge cannot eliminate it).
 
otherwise only with the explosion the dwt will contain entities that will be present at each new design as the purge eliminates only the dissolved elements with the explosion (in practice an exploded line remains a line and the purge cannot eliminate it).
Yes, in fact it is enough to eliminate the quota because the reference to that block completely disappears. At that point, the block doesn't even appear on the list of ineliminables.
But this happens with the odds. I imagine that the same thing happens both for the retini and for the annotative texts.

if I insert a block of a furniture (a chair, a table, or even any design) even by deleting that block, and saving the design (both in dwg and in dwt without giving the clear command) the reference to that block remains even if that furniture has been eliminated. I initially thought that the same thing happened with that annotative quota, and instead, once the reference to the block disappears.

rather inserting a furniture block there is no need to explode it, because that reference is eliminated and does not appear in the list of ineliminables.

I wonder who put the problem... What's the need to get rid of that d2? to earn 0.000000001 space deprives you of the utility of the annotative quotas. It doesn't make sense
 
Last edited:
to tell the truth by physically canceling a quota, not annotative, when you do purge appears in the list "blocks" with the name [imath]d...; as we know the blocks with prefix[/imath] are unaccessible and non-movable blocks, so if you delete tens of odds you will have a list of tens of $d... within the list "blocks"
this at least did it in the old versions (the last I used was 2017)
 
to tell the truth by physically deleting a quota, not annotative, when you do the purge appears in the list "blocks" with the name of...;as we know theblocksconprefissod...; as we know the blocks with prefix d.
I never realized that. Also because they usually want to eliminate the bigger blocks, and no one gets the trouble to check if the canceled odds have left some. Anyway, in my opinion, the traces that remain are really small (we talk about traces left by quotas). it is not worth going to spray the design to eliminate these traces because they are very small.

the discourse changes (always about traces left after a cancellation) when in a drawing you insert very large blocks and in large number (e.g. furniture blocks). erasing those blocks the reference to them remains in the drawing (other than what happens with the annotative quotas, whose references disappear at the time of cancellation of the quota itself) so it would be good to delete the references to those blocks (previously deleted from the drawing) with the command deletes, to lighten a little the design.

I noticed that even a new layout generates an ineliminable reference. reference that disappears, however, when you delete the layout, as it happens in the annotative odds.
 
d'accordo con te @tristus, mine was just an information like "you knew that" of the puzzle week.
I even if I shoot four fast lines for carpentry I always make a purge when I close the design, now is an automatism
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
ciao
Back
Top