help cardanic joint

[nicolapastena]

guys can't figure out how to use it in the joint function cardanic joint coupling.

 

[nicolapastena]

the problem is that in the help there are no explanations and when selections - mechanical couplings - cardanic joint - does not specify what to mate; if please someone expert in the matter gives me a hand I have already posted the parts I have to do only the assieme (I have tried to impose two concentricities and two coicides but it does not seem to me that the operation of the joint is correct)

 

[bruno85]

the problem is that in the help there are no explanations and when selections - mechanical couplings - cardanic joint - does not specify what to mate; if please someone expert in the matter gives me a hand I have already posted the parts I have to do only the assieme (I have tried to impose two concentricities and two coicides but it does not seem to me that the operation of the joint is correct)

try to recreate, with the functions together, all the couplings you would do in reality.
I couldn't open your files because you created ocn the 2011 version, and I use 2010 but I suppose there are 2 forks, the cruise, and other conponents.
parts with fundamental couplings: a concentric cruise arm with a fork, then gives a reference plan to satisfy the remaining degree of undesirable axial freedom. do the same ocn the other arm of the cruise, and then insert all the other components as you would do in the real assembly of the assembly.

If you want more spiders, you should give me components in 2010. format.

 

[nicolapastena]

I tried to see but does not save the file compatible with sw 2010. .

 

[Mike1967]

guys can't figure out how to use it in the joint function cardanic joint coupling.

in the mailed file... missing the set.

 

[nicolapastena]

I want to create that using the mechanical coupling function cardanic joint if I have to post it the fact is that the function nn I can use

 

[Mike1967]

I want to create that using the mechanical coupling function cardanic joint if I have to post it the fact is that the function nn I can use

I think you have to do the "assiemi" tutorial if not it's useless to stay here posting.
try, read the help, read it and then do the tutorial, if you can't do
a specific thing, then at that time you will try again a new question.
Bye.

 

[nicolapastena]

Here's all I'd like to apologize for an advance of not being able to use the program with the forum manager.

 

[Mike1967]

but, you did everything right, good, examine my file and you will find out why
He didn't act as a precondition.
I added an axis to fix the rotation of the tree and a reference
for the clamping.
in the absence of a carter and a tree, I added the axle and the sketch.
You could have said right away that I had already mounted it but you couldn't make it turn. . .
:smile:

 

[nicolapastena]

thank you so much then maybe you make me understand how to tie the small joint to a pinion and make it die simultaneously thanks.

 

[nicolapastena]

mike I have coupled the joint to a pinion but not yet did the concentric coupling if simulating the movement the joint turns but the pinion does not move,,

 

[Mike1967]

mike I have coupled the joint to a pinion but not yet did the concentric coupling if simulating the movement the joint turns but the pinion does not move,,

you have to bind the two components through two parallel floors.
It's like fitting the lego, with some reasoning you can get to do everything.

Hi.

 

[nicolapastena]

I feel thank you

 

[sampom]

mike I have coupled the joint to a pinion but not yet did the concentric coupling if simulating the movement the joint turns but the pinion does not move,,

Of course, concentric doesn't mean calettato.
you have to join them together (as you would do in the workshop) and there are so many ways to do it, even simply with coupling block blocking.

greetings
Marco:smile:

 

[SolidUser]

the coupling 'cardanic joint' is born to not have to use all the couplings and components necessary to simulate the motion of a cardanic joint.
This mating makes the axieme lighter and more performing simulation.
This, as you can then understand, having simulated in the cad all the necessary relationships, the aforementioned coupling makes the main axieme over-defined.

So you have two opportunities:
1) maintain your set + mike suggestion for proper operation, or
2) simulate the bike with the necessary coupling without inserting components and relationships.

I attach your file with the 'cardanic joint'.

p.s: As for the help, you're right, it's not descriptive.
you can send feedback to insert your suggestions to make that topic clearer.

 

[Mike1967]

So you have two opportunities:
2) simulate the bike with the necessary coupling without inserting components and relationships.

.

no, come on, you must admit, at least for a neophyte, that the "see" rotate
all components, seeger included, is priceless, I remember that for much less
I had an ejaculation....:biggrin:

 

[SolidUser]

no, come on, you must admit, at least for a neophyte, that the "see" rotate
all components, seeger included, is priceless, I remember that for much less
I had an ejaculation....:biggrin:

only modeling in 3d, for those coming from 2d is a satisfaction.
It is logical that if you have to perform an animation with rendering this is the only way.
But this command is very useful, do you have any idea how many pairs have been spared?
Do you think they put plastic parts in the assemblies as they are produced?
You... you can do it... but then you don't complain that you don't move anything and you'll take 20 minutes to upload a set.

 

[Mike1967]

only modeling in 3d, for those coming from 2d is a satisfaction.
It is logical that if you have to perform an animation with rendering this is the only way.
But this command is very useful, do you have any idea how many pairs have been spared?
Do you think they put plastic parts in the assemblies as they are produced?
You... you can do it... but then you don't complain that you don't move anything and you'll take 20 minutes to upload a set.

No, you're right, mine was only on the aesthetic side of the movement.
of the cardan... nice to see it complete. . .