You should be more precise, otherwise the only way to help you would be to do the thesis for you. In theory, a thesis serves to develop expertise and experience, it is not only a " obstacle" to be overcome somehow before obtaining a diploma.hello to all, I have to make a thesis on the processes necessary to make a geometry elaborated in caia suitable for an analysis in cfd.
I should establish which simplifications and additions (e.g. external domain definitions) can be made
Thank you.
for the little experience I have.... I can tell you, you enable visualization with subdivision of surfaces. If you see that there are in one area for example two adjacent surfaces with very different sizes (but one is very thin, the other is extended), it can be the case that you have defined a very small fitting and you can eliminate it by making a living edge that area. Of course, this must be done in common. you can not eliminate fittings that in some way serve and contribute (e.g. fittings that avoid the carving effect if one is doing a structural analysis instead of cfd), but you can eliminate all those fittings (0.5-1mm, etc.) that are there not to make a living edge geometry, but from the point of view of the calculation do not give particular significant contributions, instead you mess only the meshing.the problem is that I don't have a model on which to try, I have a good experience with catia and other modeling software but having never used cfd software I have no idea what might be the main problems that can arise from importing 3d models...
I do not know whether the major problems arise from the form (e.g. edges, high-range fittings or other) or are due to the mesh characters (form, tolerance...) or whether it is better to use elements of surface or volume
ps..scusa for the double post I didn't know which section was suitable