how to create a curved wall and a glass surface

[Ciccio87]

Hello, everyone! use revit 2010. I have to create a wall that curves at the top.. that is seen in section is a parallelepiped on which rests half arch... a spece of sickle. .

I also have to create a glazed cover, a glass plate of 10 cm..

I can't solve these problems. Help me!

 

[gfrank]

answers to your questions, i.e. the help I can give you, is related to the (your) knowledge of the sw, on a scale from 0 to 100, i.e.:
1 - from 0 to 30, the help I can give you is to advise you to start "studying" the operation of the sw, especially the families of walls;
2 - from 31 to 45 , to allow me to help you, you must first indicate at which point of the "muro" you are animated; for glazed cover, see point 1;
3 - from 46 to 60, for the wall you should not have problems, at the limit ask which mode to use, of the two (more) consons; for the window see point 2 (muro);
4 - from 61 to 70, for the wall you should have no problem (which excludes your knowledge of the sw over 60); for the glass see point 3 (muro);
5 - more than 71...

I also recommend that the forum has already dealt with these topics in previous discussions, from which with a little good will and patience, you can draw the information of the case.

Finally, before posting, a read to the regulation does not spoil ....

 

[schinca]

hi!...then,I use revit 2011,but cmq is very similar indeed as settings is equal to 2010...change only the renders... .

cmq a parallelepiped wall, i.e. if I did not understand badly you mean a wall with the base that leans more than the base that attaches to the ceiling? ? ?

cmq x these types of wall, at least x how much I know, you can not do, in spite of an archicad that has it... but there are ''escamotage''' x solve any kind of problem....I, x example, a wall like this, I build it as if it were a floor, with the view from above...After that at the top points I give it the height I want. so I get a vertical floor with a slight slope!!...
you may also use the 'topographic surface' to achieve a similar result.but I disagree because, if you have to assign a raster image to your wall that amounts to you (xkè the material you want is not present in the list, so you put it a photo you own) then with the topographic surface the image is all elongated x via the slope,mantre with the 'vertical' floor ! !

x as regards the fact of bending the wall, it should be enough to build a floor by making it follow the curve line instead of the straight one... .

Are you clear? ? I hope to have made myself explain, but there is something that I take x discounted.....!!!.sorry... . !
Otherwise it means I didn't understand your problem.... .

 

[Tristan]

hi!...then,I use revit 2011,but cmq is very similar indeed as settings is equal to 2010...change only the renders... .

If you know how to use it superficially... if it were as you say no one would have updated it, would you?

cmq a parallelepiped wall, i.e. if I did not understand badly you mean a wall with the base that leans more than the base that attaches to the ceiling? ? ?

if you call "the base that sticks to the ceiling" you understand better.. .

cmq x these types of wall, at least x how much I know,cannot be done,compared to an archicad that has it

as above...it does not (as you say) if you know how to use it superficially:

I, for example, a wall like this, build it as if it were a floor, with the view from above...after at the top points I give him the height I want. so I get a vertical floor with a slight slope!!...

aaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!! What is it? ? Guys, come on, it's nice that everyone gets a hand but don't give these piff advice!! This is a monstrousity!! a wall generated with the family of floors?! Come on.

you could also use the 'topographic surface' to get a similar result.but you'll get it

non ho parole...:frown:

x as regards the fact of bending the wall, it should be enough to build a floor by making it follow the curve line instead of the straight one... .

but rather modeling in-place all life!! Don't hurt her, but if you have to give these tips, I suggest you first of all take a nice course. These are not escamotages as you call them, these are pigs!

 

[schinca]

Listen, I try to care for a hand....you spend your life criticising?!??!? . . I'm sorry if I'm not a technician and I'm trying to give answers to someone who asks for... do you think? ? . . .
It wasn't enough just to say. Is it wrong? ? ? . . ...
critical, but where were you when I asked for help on renderings invisible despite all the settings were correct, my dear expert?!? ! ! ! . ....
Do you know how the workers do? they know little and on what little they know they sell you and do not have a human sense to others.....equal you are!!!...bravo!! !

before criticizing information about user cards: I am a university student, friend a technician!!!. and I ask those who make the forum, trying not to meet omerta!!!! Isn't that the meaning of creating a forum?? that is to make continuous comparisons? ? . ...

so I know my!!! lower the airs....and begin to distribute-share your knowledge with others, without having bleaching attitudes!...ok? ? ?

Finally, you were so worried to criticize me, that the poor boy did not give any advice. ..compliments, majesty....

 

[Tristan]

We're on the defensive, huh? Just calm down, okay? It's nice that you give a hand but knowing your limits only recommends when you're sure you're helping. It's like I went to a kitchen in a big restaurant and I proposed myself as a cook help... and what does it take? between the stoves at my house I have a good cable... it doesn't work so you know. So be humble, you just arrived, you're still studying, I don't see what you need to inhale yourself like this.
You want to know why I didn't answer the invisible rendering post? because rather than shooting crap, I was shut up and I made those who could have given you a hand in a concrete way. Do you understand the concept?
Moreover, since I am accused of keeping my knowledge close I inform you that I keep a technical blog on autodesk products with various tips&tricks explained step by step also according to the needs of this and other forums, so you lower the crest and be humble!

 

[schinca]

easy to tell me to calm down...I explain now in peace!... although I know very well that reading these things one never understands the tone with which the other person writes them....cmq I think you didn't realize that you started to screw me, when you could quietly tell me 'no look, you are still at the first steps, it is better than let us talk more experts. . '
You think? Instead, rereading what you wrote again, it seems that you also need humility!!!! ...I have!it is true, I forgot to write it in this discussion, but xkè already on my profile I wrote it...and what do I have to do, repeat it every time I write something? ? . . .

 

[Erikilrosso]

hi crashes, an unwritten rule of the forum is that if one does not know a subject, at most, it can suggest a way to do and, in any case, not if he takes it if who is more experienced than he sits it. I would not use the term "sputtanare" to explain how much tristan responded to you: it was limited to highlight that some solutions proposed by you are not properly feasible.:biggrin:
So don't take it, sooner or later you'll be good, too, and you can "fuck" the young inexperienced.
Moreover, the question posed by ciccio 87 is not that it was particularly clear and understandable:

I have to create a wall that curves at the top

What do you mean?
and for the glazed cover has only to look on the manual.

 

[Tristan]

cmq I think you didn't realize you started screwing me

Come on. What a big word! I just said that your escamotage is wrong and indeed, it's not an escamotage but it's a cool and tight thing for your hair. but I don't think I've written that you don't understand a biiiiip and give you to the hyppic (this would have been offensive!). Anyway, let's get us on a line, if I showed you offense, I'm sorry, it wasn't my intention.

Now, coming to the post in question, I tell you how I would do it (although without an exemplifying drawing rag it is difficult to guess how close and curved this wall should be):

solution1. if the wall is not too curved and the shape quite regular I would use an embedded wall extrusion in the type of wall

solution2. if the wall is very particular and the above form applies to a single instance I create a local model obtained from a union or extrusion on path (depending on what form I want to get)

 

[gfrank]

easy to tell me to calm down... I will explain now in peace!... although I know very well that reading these things one never understands the tone with which the other person writes.... .

First of all, given the reciprocal clarifications, I think it is appropriate that everyone close with the "polemic" insort, which does not make any contribution to the initial discussion ....

I should like to point out that, in the course of the debate, opened by Mr Ciccio87, I should like to stress that:
1- the title of the same, began with "... very urgent..." (which as moderator I corrected);
2-the poor indications contained in the questions asked;
3-the incorrect use of the "terms" used by the sw;

in my opinion indicate a lack of knowledge of the use of revit, but especially the use of this forum (as highlighted in cicco87)

In fact, often, the user fails to report the degree of knowledge/use of the sw (in the specific case still in the ver. 2010), which is fundamental to set a correct answer.

In this sense, I tried to request more information to the user (see my post), who, despite having already passed two days since he sent the first message, still did not make himself feel ...

It follows that, as has often happened, by older users (in the sense of the most active ones), you are reconsidered "among the lines" that someone wants to "find the ready parrot" , without even trying to look for in previous discussions if such arguments (or similar) had already been avoided or not...

such a way of "proposing" is certainly not in the spirit of the forums, and reading more carefully the regulation, such a way of "proposing" (by the user in his first message) can also be subject to "ban".
said in poor words, the spirit of the forum is:
- if you offer collaboration, find collaboration;
If you're trying to "get smart" you find... ...
I repeat, the most active users are enough "scafati" to immediately recognize the "furbi" ...

the forum has never denied help to anyone, especially to those who, although "novellini", have shown respect and education to all other users of the forum; and of what I affirm you find concrete evidence from several students who have submitted exams (and also part of thesis) with the help of the forum. someone wrote public thanks (to the forum and/or to specific users), someone put the forum as "bibliographic reference" at the bottom of the examination reports or the graduation thesis ...

closing, I also recommend to you, to check carefully the various requests of the forum, in particular to verify that behind a pseudonym, you do not hide some "flammator", that triggers such arguments precisely to unleash "flame" with not young people to the forum and community ...