how to draw the side view of this mysterious object.

[Marco F inox]

Bye to all,
because this forum is rich in technicians, designers, designers, performers and many fans who follow us without intervention in the discussions, I propose a question addressed to me when I attended the beginning in 1968.
These are simple orthogonal projections, of a solid object, where the view in front is equal to the view from above and all the lines that make up it are the only ones necessary to identify its definitive form.
for someone will be a children's game, for others perhaps a great puzzle, but rtengo is a useful diversion, even for the time of the holidays already started.
I always follow you with great interest and I wish you every good in your profession.

 

[Fabietto]

but can you publish your solution?
or better wait a bit to leave time for everyone to try?

 

[LaboratorioDieci]

It will be that I am led to reason complicated, but I see more than one possibility of interpretation. if there were also hidden lines covered. . .
However, I always remain ecstatic in seeing the writings of the old school designers

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

It is a blandly provocative exercise that had already been done years ago. I can't find the discussion, but I'm pretty sure there is

 

[ragnol]

your "solid object" sketch respects the rules of technical design?

If yes, there is a possible solution, if no there is another (according to me, of course).

 

[Marco F inox]

It is a blandly provocative exercise that had already been done years ago. I can't find the discussion, but I'm pretty sure there is

from the answers already arrived, it is understood that it is not a bland exercise, mirrors the rules of the design, has no lines drawn because there are not and it would be useful to leave for a little suspended the solution.
It is absolutely not provocative as it exercises mind to reasoning.
If you do not find the previous discussion, you can always try to give your solution, since you seem to want to expose your capabilities, even memory.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

from the answers already arrived, it is understood that it is not a bland exercise, mirrors the rules of the design, has no lines drawn because there are not and it would be useful to leave for a little suspended the solution.
It is absolutely not provocative as it exercises mind to reasoning.
If you do not find the previous discussion, you can always try to give your solution, since you seem to want to expose your capabilities, even memory.

to be blanda is provocation not exercise.
the fact that you do not find the discussion is because during the work time to do a research with no exact term there is.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

to be blanda is provocation not exercise.
the fact that you do not find the discussion is because during the work time to do a research with no exact term there is.

for those who want the shortcut the discussion is of 22 October 2009, the post in the specific is of 8 December 2009

 

[Davide98]

Is this the solution?

 

[radio]

No, that's it. :d

 

[PIETRO2002]

Is this the solution?

I was about to write, that there was something inclined to 45°, but you preceded me by publishing the 3d, it is not worth! ahah

 

[Marco F inox]

Is this the solution?

sin that presenting it here, you have taken away the chance to others to think about it and reason in your own, however you are a good apprentice. Bye.

 

[Marco F inox]

No, that's it. :d

View attachment 68833
View attachment 68832

This is a good provocation!

 

[Marco F inox]

to be blanda is provocation not exercise.
the fact that you do not find the discussion is because during the work time to do a research with no exact term there is.

You must read my words well, but above all what you write, not to self-respect.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

You must read my words well, but above all what you write, not to self-respect.

it seems to me that the phrase

is a blandly provocative exercise

can be read in one direction, only you can think that the term "blandly" refers to the noun "exercise"

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

Since the ark has been solved, I put the old discussion problem in technical design.

 

[Cadinpiedi]

there are more solutions. . .
that can hold the comparison with rendering there is only the shaded axometry, practically the grandmother of the realistic photo image!
But be careful, in a while you will work with glasses for virtual reality.
ps. who knows how he would respond to quesito chat gpt...

 

[Cadinpiedi]

playing with the surfaces there would be two other solutions. the spline that gives origin to the curve is perfectly tangent to the flat surface therefore does not generate a edge, although a modern cad in the table can signal with a ruler the beginning of the curved surface.

 

[Cadinpiedi]

to complete the work I attach a step file of objects.
I imagine a teacher who after printing them in 3d extracts one from the folder and asks students: "make me the three views", extract the second and "make me the three views", and the third idem and so on. we accept bets on after how many times the class would start to noise, not to say more.... :

 

[Marco F inox]

there are more solutions. . .
that can hold the comparison with rendering there is only the shaded axometry, practically the grandmother of the realistic photo image!
But be careful, in a while you will work with glasses for virtual reality.
ps. who knows how he would respond to quesito chat gpt...
View attachment 68835

from the left, the first, second and sixth, are not valid, as they have the slave and would have requested the restraint, from me immediately excluded, the others are just.