hybrid modeling and standard modeling

[ferrezio]

I open this forum to try to spy the difference between hybrid modeling and standard modeling.

who would like to add clarifications and welcome

Hello everyone

 

[The_Matrix]

interesting. . .
but could you just clarify the difference between "hybrid modeling" and "non-hybrid modeling" for us?
the difference is that the hybrid allows you to use explicit functionality or entity?

 

[falonef]

It is advisable to work in a non-hybrid way.
we would have a logical structure:
- solid elements and features in part body
- elements of ausler construction in the geometric set

 

[ferrezio]

no the difference lies in the fact that in the hybrid all wire-frame entities, surfaces, solids, are inserted in the partbody container, and are in close relationship father-son, so that changing insertion point with (tdx-> changes insertion point) you will notice that the features beyond the insertion point are hidden.
while in standard mode the wire frame and the surfaces are in the geometric group, and are independent from the insemite point.
so it is not affected by coome modeling, but as I had already said in another discussion here of the forum, and important to recognize when the system is not aligned to the model we are processing (eye to the color of the gear)

Hi.

 

[marcofa]

having a hybrid-shaped set, what happens if you turn off the hybrid modeling?
Mar

 

[ferrezio]

having a hybrid-shaped set, what happens if you turn off the hybrid modeling?
Mar

The thing that happens is that you create a model with mixed, standard and hybrid geometries, you wouldn't even know if you don't use boolean.

my advice and always align the system to the model.

Hi.

 

[stef_design]

What mode do you use ferretium?

 

[falonef]

fashionllazione standard (non ibrida)!!! :finger: :finger: finger:

 

[ferrezio]

What mode do you use ferretium?

I started from the 5 r4 is the hybrid was introduced with the r13, so by habit I am led to work with standard, and where work, the hybrid was disabled.
for the little I tried finds the hybrid I find it too rigid, especially when dealing with solids and surfaces.

Hi.

 

[panormus]

no the difference lies in the fact that in the hybrid all wire-frame entities, surfaces, solids, are inserted in the partbody container, and are in close relationship father-son, so that changing insertion point with (tdx-> changes insertion point) you will notice that the features beyond the insertion point are hidden.
while in standard mode the wire frame and the surfaces are in the geometric group, and are independent from the insemite point.
so it is not affected by coome modeling, but as I had already said in another discussion here of the forum, and important to recognize when the system is not aligned to the model we are processing (eye to the color of the gear)

Hi.

What do you mean by insertion point?