i look for translator vrlm/stl to iges

[Fabrizio M]

Good morning to all,
I begin by saying that I am a 1/2 landslide in looking for voices in this forum.
I ask you if there are vrlm translators towards iges or stl towards iges, of course free or online.
Thank you all.

 

[mariuss.r]

Good morning to all,
I begin by saying that I am a 1/2 landslide in looking for voices in this forum.
I ask you if there are vrlm translators towards iges or stl towards iges, of course free or online.
Thank you all.

vrml and stl formats contain only mesh(triangols).
iges format does not manage mesh ....so there are no stl->iges translators

the art of reconstructing surfaces from stl is called reverse engineering and it is an art, which can hardly be automated.

 

[Fabrizio M]

vrml and stl formats contain only mesh(triangols).
iges format does not manage mesh ....so there are no stl->iges translators

the art of reconstructing surfaces from stl is called reverse engineering and it is an art, which can hardly be automated.

You're saying something wrong, the translator would have found it, only it's paid http://www.cadlook.com/It works perfectly, but it's trial, for the use I have to do, I would need a free one.

 

[maxopus]

You're saying something wrong, the translator would have found it, only it's paid http://www.cadlook.com/It works perfectly, but it's trial, for the use I have to do, I would need a free one.

Fabrious before you say things like that, did you do two tests?
I'm in reverse and "packs" like that. I've seen them in bizzeffe.
It's the fuffe we'd gladly do without.
If you take a stl or an obj or whatever you want and turn it into iges or step with cadlook you do nothing but make all triangles of the surfaces (any triangle a surface).
I don't know what to do with it.
Do you think that all companies in the world who use reverse as a working method, instead of spending money on reverse packages and a sea of time to make correct models... wouldn't spend 4 money to convert files instantly?
Come on...

 

[nino66]

I'm in reverse and "packs" like that. I've seen them in bizzeffe.

Did you see any of them free anyway?

Also solidworks does it (although limited to the professional version, limits the number of triangles that can convert) and also to me it happened to need such a conversion.
I obviously know that this is not reverse enginering but sometimes this passage is very useful.

 

[Fabrizio M]

Fabrious before you say things like that, did you do two tests?
I'm in reverse and "packs" like that. I've seen them in bizzeffe.
It's the fuffe we'd gladly do without.
If you take a stl or an obj or whatever you want and turn it into iges or step with cadlook you do nothing but make all triangles of the surfaces (any triangle a surface).
I don't know what to do with it.
Do you think that all companies in the world who use reverse as a working method, instead of spending money on reverse packages and a sea of time to make correct models... wouldn't spend 4 money to convert files instantly?
Come on...

Come on...
what I translated are simple forms and what cadlook did is enough, I have to use it on home pc.
translated the files I treated them with cam delcam and everything works perfectly smoothly, the piece was a solid before and it is a solid even after, of faces do not miss therefore "it could" go well.
in the past I used the reverse of delcam, but worked on an existing piece, now instead of the free program I downloaded here >>>> http://www.ptc.com/products/creo-elements-direct/modeling it gives me just vrlm and stl, so I wanted to translate it into a maneuverable format.
I repeat the question that I have been wrongly formulated:
What do you recommend to switch from these formats to a maneuverable?

 

[maxopus]

it is manoeuvrable if it is a cube or a little more, if it is a minimally complex model, do not handle it anymore.
I tried to treat the exterior surfaces of a car hood (very simple), the result is a 20 megabyte file (compared to 1 mega of the original surface).
Imagine what happens with the conversion of a bas-relief from 200,000 triangles (and are also few).
I don't need to buy a converter.

 

[Fabrizio M]

I don't need to buy a converter.

I don't have pros, so I have to arrange some other way.
the files are big, but for now they seem manoeuvrable, in 13gg everything ends.

 

[mariuss.r]

I don't have pros, so I have to arrange some other way.
the files are big, but for now they seem manoeuvrable, in 13gg everything ends.

If what you need is simply convert every triangle into a surface....download the demo version of rhino (25 available saves) ... and use the _meshtonurb command.

do exactly what cadlook.com does

amounts the stl the "convert" in a polysurface and exposes it in iges.

But if the purpose is to cut the piece, I don't understand why convert it to iges since any cam also works on triangolls.

 

[Fabrizio M]

If what you need is simply convert every triangle into a surface....download the demo version of rhino (25 available saves) ... and use the _meshtonurb command.

do exactly what cadlook.com does

amounts the stl the "convert" in a polysurface and exposes it in iges.

But if the purpose is to cut the piece, I don't understand why convert it to iges since any cam also works on triangolls.

sometimes though I have to show iges to someone who does not have stl or vrlm and who does not want to put viewers

always try to meet the needs of others

Thank you.