i want to understand the distinct materials!

[drake]

Save kids,
I press that I am resetting everything I know about sw x always discover new things.
I attach a simple example of together with which I'm doing some distinct material tests x set me new templates. for simplicity I have inserted the distinct in the model instead of in a table, but the concept does not change.
Then I can't handle a distinct disposition that can be readable "by idiot." I insert the distinct and get what you see.
apart from the fact that the column titles have shredded x magic, if clikko x insert or remove detailed cut distinction the length 500 appears under the item quantity! also in the quantity column how are the quantities of the elements represented? Why put in the second line of upn quantity 1? I can't figure out how to change the settings if I don't make changes by hand. Please give me some advice. how do you manage the different ones, when the models get complicated?
Thank you.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

as you have made a distinct solidworks return writes the quantities for containers.
in practice you have 3 fe1 assemblies which contain each 1 part 1001 and 2 parts 1002
in turn part 1002 contains an upn180
then column quantity indicates the number of the element present in its container
If you insert the detailed numbering (which you may have deleted) you would be clearer to the concept.
the total quantity column specific in total how many elements serve.

with regard to that 500 is due to the fact that for the elements of the cut distinction is given the possibility of having the total sum that is managed through the heading 'quantity distinct materials' of the properties in the part of the cutting distinct element. that entry is multiplied by the quantities present. so if in that field you have entered the item length this property will be multiplied by the amount and reported in that column. try to make a repetition of the element and you will see how it behaves.

the question is: do you need the distinct indentation? Do you have to show the components of the cut-off?

 

[drake]

Thank you first!
I'd need to create a simple distinction that can happen to anyone and that I don't have much to do when I do it. it would be useful to have the distinct like the one made but instead of creating the upn voice 180 twice, he did only one with the right amount 2.
the right distinction for me would be a way between the one made and the one that is created by setting only the parts.
the last line I should delete it by hand, which is not easy if there are many components, beyond the possibility of committing erroti.
the fact that he manages my lengths I will try it and evaluate if it can come back useful.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I'd say I didn't make a difference in return.
but first we try to understand how you manage things and then go to find the best solution:
In general, do you need to make a separate cut? on drawings or simple excel to pass to commercial? in the distinct materials you need to have both the assemblies (and/or subaxis) and its components?

for the speech lengths should be enough to put the tick to detailed cut distinct under the con rientranza.

 

[drake]

I need a distinct x who will have to produce the pieces. I would like to attach it both to the drawings it out in an electronic sheet. a priori I do not know how I will model the various components, but I believe to proceed with individual parts that make up assemblies. the parts I could create them as welds but also as simple extrusions, etc. I am asking all these questions xthat I am trying to organize the work, x me new, from this point of view. sometimes in models that can have both simple parts and assemblies and sub-assistances. the only distinct that is clear in sw, without any manual modification, is that of the individual parts. when they introduce axioms and subaxioms, it becomes more tangled.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

if you do not use the separate cut gates (right button on the separate and delete) and you will have a distinct materials with re-entry that will contain only assemblies and parts

 

[drake]

Okay, sure. Thank you.