• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

ifeature x key seat

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tarkus
  • Start date Start date

Tarkus

Guest
Hello everyone, :smile:
I have to draw for a client, several trees with key posts with various sizes.
I don't want to do the plan, the sketch, the extrusion every time;
I don't want to use the tree generator I can't stand and make me work together.
So, I thought I'd do ifeatures, even if it's something I rarely did, but the extrusion excavation seems not to be contemplated in the ifeatures.
Then I ask:
Shouldn't there be ifeatures for key locations? If yes where?
If not, am I doing something wrong?
Finally:
How are you doing? :redface::biggrin:
 
but there has already been in the old "design accelerator" or design -> key and follow instructions
 
you have to make a set, even support (which you will need to save) where you can only place the tree or/or the hub...
 
As I said in the first post, it doesn't like the tree generator because it makes you work together to create a part, and then at least for how I work, it doesn't seem like a "accelerator". .
However, returning to the ifeature, is it normal that the extrusion is not a valid processing?(for the ifeature). .
 
I say my...
key processing should be among the standard ifeatures (the ones in the basic catalog) and are the ones with written in the name "pocket" (tax), only that then have the size in chickens and make you choose only the basic plan to position.
In any case, thinking about it, even having the ad hoc ifeature, you do not save then the creation of the plan, of the sketch with the insertion point and not last the creation of the variables that will generate the quotas of the processing of the key. . .
I've created some sort of hyphaeature a few months ago to do some standard parts work, so I'll tell you what you can do... But to explain it's a little long, maybe if I find a little time I'll explain to you and anyway I don't know if we can fix it. . . .
 
Tarkus said:
...
However, returning to the ifeature, is it normal that the extrusion is not a valid processing?(for the ifeature). .
Click to expand...
I believe that your problem (initial, because then they will jump out others, that for now I don't have time to explain, however they concern the points and the plans of positioning and the order of the features) is the fact that you want "subito" a negative extrusion that he doesn't do you, in fact you must first start with a positive workmanship and then make the negative one, but eye, when you create the sketch for the basic extrusion of the . .
 
Ilario said:
I say my...
key processing should be among the standard ifeatures (the ones in the basic catalog) and are the ones with written in the name "pocket" (tax), only that then have the size in chickens and make you choose only the basic plan to position.
In any case, thinking about it, even having the ad hoc ifeature, you do not save then the creation of the plan, of the sketch with the insertion point and not last the creation of the variables that will generate the quotas of the processing of the key. . .
I've created some sort of hyphaeature a few months ago to do some standard parts work, so I'll tell you what you can do... But to explain it's a little long, maybe if I find a little time I'll explain to you and anyway I don't know if we can fix it. . . .
Click to expand...
the features pocket, or worse the c.c. work in the case of key locations, are in fact unavailable.
I wait to see what you've solved... as soon as you can. .
 
Meanwhile you place the files, in the .zip folder you find the .ide file of the ifeature and the .ipt base file from which I started to generate the ifeautre.
try drawing a cylinder and positioning the processing by specifying as a plane, one of the two cylinder pins and as a base point the central point by touching the edge of the circumference, as an alternative (that for your key will be I think what you will have to do) you create a tangent plane and a sketch in which you will position a point/center/hole at the altitude you want and select the plane and the point at the insertion of the ifing.
After, if you like the thing and it's what you are looking for, try to see the .ipt base file, looking at the fx parameters to which I changed the names (only for pinion and clarity) and maybe try to replicate my .ide file.
other thing, if you want a table ipart, like what I did, you will need to open the .ide file after you have generated it and go to change the table later as the iparts, but when you change the table, saved and closed the file, you do not go back and if there is something you did not calculate before you will have to re-generate the .ide file.
In the meantime, you see, then I see if I respond to abnormalities, I can solve you lost. . .
 

Attachments

I don't know if you use the c.c. meant as shapes, if you create your tondo and then from the axieme you make your key... 20second time to say so.
not with the generator trees that I think is very uncomfortable... .
 
Peppe said:
I don't know if you use the c.c. meant as shapes, if you create your tondo and then from the axieme you make your key... 20second time to say so.
not with the generator trees that I think is very uncomfortable... .
Click to expand...
Yeah, it's quick, it's two things left:
-I always have to do a file of assembly that I can't delete, and then duplicate the number of files.
I'm obliged to use standard lengths, or at least I couldn't give it a different length than those imposed by the norm.
Moreover, they are "standard work"...
 
Tarkus said:
Yeah, it's quick, it's two things left:
-I always have to do a file of assembly that I can't delete, and then duplicate the number of files.
Click to expand...
you can always use the same file together and save it on your desktop which then you will delete naturally you lose the connection to the key. . .
Tarkus said:
I'm obliged to use standard lengths, or at least I couldn't give it a different length than those imposed by the norm.
Moreover, they are "standard work"...
Click to expand...
create your standard length then enter the part and edit the feature that generated inventor by changing the length in what you need
 
Peppe said:
you can always use the same file together and save it on your desktop which then you will delete naturally you lose the connection to the key. . .



create your standard length then enter the part and edit the feature that generated inventor by changing the length in what you need
Click to expand...
is published only by the axieme, I must edit before erasing, then it will not be possible to do so, unless to explode the processing and edit the ifeature. .
 
Tarkus said:
is published only by the axieme, I must edit before erasing, then it will not be possible to do so, unless to explode the processing and edit the ifeature. .
Click to expand...
In fact.... you have your feature for the keystrokes that you can move, rotate and edit length... .
 
Tarkus said:
It is inherited only from the axieme,......... to explode the processing and edit the ifeature. .
Click to expand...
mi autoquoto:
Yes, but if I expulse the processing of the accelerator, I find myself a ifeature that works.
Then why not use it as such?:eek:
I copied it, spent some time figuring out how it works and changing it, and here it is, ready for those who don't want to move from the accelerator design.
no need to create sketches or reference geometries ad hoc,just choose the cylindrical face,a reference plane,which can be a cylinder base and a plane of origin that can be any plane parallel to the cylinder axis
a clarification:
edit only fields with value input message.

:biggrin::biggrin:
 

Attachments

I put here ifeature of my private school, I also have those of the state school put them later, I would like to create them x 2010 of course, if someone knows how to tell me how? Thank you in advance.
Could I put my designs on this forum?


Hello:cool:
 

Attachments

Tarkus said:
mi autoquoto:
Yes, but if I expulse the processing of the accelerator, I find myself a ifeature that works.
Then why not use it as such?:eek:
I copied it, spent some time figuring out how it works and changing it, and here it is, ready for those who don't want to move from the accelerator design.
no need to create sketches or reference geometries ad hoc,just choose the cylindrical face,a reference plane,which can be a cylinder base and a plane of origin that can be any plane parallel to the cylinder axis
a clarification:
edit only fields with value input message.

:biggrin::biggrin:
Click to expand...
tried to use it but does not save time: However, we must find the measurements of width and depth... sin!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 0 (members: 0, guests: 0)
ciao
Back
Top