• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

il miglior cad cam

  • Thread starter Thread starter matteoli
  • Start date Start date

matteoli

Guest
Hello, everyone. .
would you tell me what the miglior cad cam is on the market and the most used by companies?

Thank you.
 
question of cassio, which does not bring anywhere:frown:

like saying which is the best car on the market and the most used by motorists.
If you answer ferraris or rolls you can agree on the concept of "best" but certainly not on that of "more used".
if you answer panda or yaris, then the perspective turns over completely.

the same with the cam. there are space cams, that do things to the limit of the absurd and that like the rolls are almost studied to measure for the customer, but that they will be used to the maximum from 1 company on 10000, while there are production cams, very spartan and perhaps also considered old and obsolete, but that you find them on the pcs also of the first cellar that you meet on the street.
 
If there was a "better cad of all" there wouldn't be any other cad on the market, would you?
 
I put myself in the tip of my feet

I think matteoli
Maybe he asks that is the cad-cam-
best
in the sense that only one sw has both the design part and the part of the tool paths

at least so I can interpret the question

Thank you very much
 
Yes....it's right shiren would interest me knowing only about the cad-cam....I didn't formulate the question very well:more than the best cad-cam would interest me to know what is the most used by companies.... .
 
I'm sorry, but we're always at the 100-perch field, which means "the most used by companies"?
What companies?
what makes massive production?
What are they doing, prototypes?
What are they doing?

turning?
2 axes, 4 axes synchronized, motorized, multi-mandrino, mobile fan??? ? ? ?

milling?
2 axes and a half, 3 axes, 4 axes indexed or continuous, 5 or more axes always indexed or continuous?? ? ? ?

Saying the best cam or the most used one doesn't say anything.

I'll just give you an example.
(for all others: This is just an example, don't start this is better, and that's not worth a snitch. only one example to understand the logic of reasoning):
If we were to make names like powermill or tebis, then many moulders or prototypes would say "for me numbers one!" while instead a company that makes production of series, maybe with many setups on different machines would tell you "nice, but too complicated and difficult to manage. powermill? nice as well, maybe a little less complicated, but with cost out of scale for our work"

We're always here: if a person needs a panda, for him a roll will be a good object of desire, but even if he doesn't know what to do with it. and vice versa.
 
matteoli, you raised a big dust, but you also asked a sensible question; not knowing much about the world of cam, your question is more than logical.

If for cad there are many programs (s.edge, s. works, proe, katia, inventor, ug, etc.) for the cam is much worse, it is an infinite jungle.
and a very important paramentro to analyze is the use you have to do (torn, milling, electro-erosion, etc.)

for my knowledge (other than too extensive) here in my area (brescia) a very used program is worknc.
this program is very valid for molders, and only manages milling up to 5 axes.
then I know (and it seems valid for ease of use) "edgecam" but I don't know how much it is used.

so maybe you'd better talk to some company that already uses a program, feel different impressions and entrust yourself to someone, taking into account that there is no absolute and unique answer.

It's like asking: "Are blondes, brunettes or redheads better?"hello and good work

france
 
thank you for your answer was very satisfying. ...what I'm looking for is cad-cam or just cam that can program work centers from 3 to 5 axes... and back to 5 axes... .
 
try to take a look at "edgecam" the features of this program are:
1) Intuitive
2) manages milling, turning and electro-erosion
3) if you have to do very difficult work, tend to "enter"
4) the post processor can create you user without making you do it by the program manager
5) the cost is affordable compared to other software

My characteristics take them with pliers, I am not a very great expert, in this period this program I am analyzing it thoroughly, but I am sure there will be something better.

Hi.
 
fraribre said:
.

It's like asking: "Are blondes, brunettes or redheads better?"
Click to expand...
I don't know.
Also be careful to focus on one program, if the company you work for goes to that country, and recently there are so many, you are out of the market if you do not know other programs.
and if you're ever going to give you to the world of molds...... let it go! ! !
Great Breast
 
I agree with the first answers given on this topic. .
... everything is realized according to its operating parameters. not least the cost.. as I certainly do not go to buy a super-centre of work from millions of € to make 4 holes on 'na plate.. .
 
CARSON said:
I agree with the first answers given on this topic. .
... everything is realized according to its operating parameters. not least the cost.. as I certainly do not go to buy a super-centre of work from millions of € to make 4 holes on 'na plate.. .
Click to expand...
Hello carson
actually you have ray
But sometimes (but this is another speech)
some companies spend that extra kit in case they manage to find
a little work that is not exactly what to make holes

The discussion is big
in fact it is necessary to evaluate in the real in the face of situations and probblematics that live in everyday life
to decide that sw is more suitable for your needs
and what programs do you have for the future
Thank you very much
 
hi shiren, it's nice to meet again every now and then. . .
I speak for myself of course. . :rolleyes::redface:
 
You're right, too. .
Unfortunately in the daily (!!!) if it were feasible they would make you dig tricks with nails :frown:

All right. better times. .
 
CARSON said:
You're right, too. .
Unfortunately in the daily (!!!) if it were feasible they would make you dig tricks with nails

.
Click to expand...
and who tells you that we have not already done it:36_1_4:

a mill in md dia.10 r5 (torica) 70€
the commercial told me does the job with fingers
the big finger and give 10:36_6_8:
 
matteoli said:
thank you for your answer was very satisfying. ...what I'm looking for is cad-cam or just cam that can program work centers from 3 to 5 axes... and back to 5 axes... .
Click to expand...
Well if you care about this we say that good or bad can do almost all, instead to choose that + suitable for your needs is a little + difficult because some do 'what' others do not or do it in a very different way.
experience teaches me that the more the cam is 'best' ... + time (=money) it takes to learn, + it is difficult to use (especially if used little), + it is complicated the optimization of post-pro, + coast, + high must be the level of education of those who use it etc ... of course the result should be better but unfortunately many times it is not so ...
I always say that it is like buying a tool machine, there is no milling machine or the best lathe but only the + suitable for the purpose after which all come back and brake ...
also know which is the + used leaves the time it finds since some costs 5000 neur while others cost 50000 , surely the first will be + only because + people can afford it.
to choose the 'my' I put + of a year between demo and various tours on the fairs, after which I do not think I will leave it so easily seen the time spent to learn it as you must.
changing company I took the same software so as to be immediately productive, in this case it turned out to be the 'best' only because I knew it already and the company did not spend neither time nor money in training courses (usually quite expensive).
if you already know mastercam I would tell you to go ahead with that since between the average cams is definitely among the best and + used, if it wasn't so proof to explain why.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 0 (members: 0, guests: 0)
Back
Top