imminent choice: solidedge or solidworks?

[TECNOMODEL]

I would see it from another point of view.
you have to do the interest of the company that you work for, not that of the external study.
It's likely that the firm has changed because it has a big client that has imposed it on it, if it manages to get you through to that it saves a license.
What is the passage to you? license, training, time, lack of continuity with the archive etc.
to me it seems that the game does not apply the candle, you must adapt the study to you.

 

[Stefano_GS]

to me escape some things:
between your company and this firm who is a customer and who a supplier.
if as I mortgage the study is your supplier, how important is it for you? the question would be the same even if you were their suppliers.
you as well as with them for what purposes do you use cad?
do you have relationships with customers that bind you in terms of software?

 

[meccanicamg]

to me escape some things:
between your company and this firm who is a customer and who a supplier.
if as I mortgage the study is your supplier, how important is it for you? the question would be the same even if you were their suppliers.
you as well as with them for what purposes do you use cad?
do you have relationships with customers that bind you in terms of software?

I fear that the supplier, i.e. the design studio has 90% of the company's know-how in hand and for this reason there is this kind of blackmail... otherwise there would be no reason for it. and the press company and manages the shop and factory....maybe little more. If that's the case, it's a sad scenario because it's enough because the studio finds another company that works... and the company closes. I hope I'm wrong.

 

[genesis1975]

Look at the company before my hiring didn't have the technical office... it's always served with external studies, and these are evident that they still have their weight... I'm alone, and apart from the realization of a new model, it's not like I can do miracles.

 

[genesis1975]

Well, I think you're wrong, mechanical mg... even if I wonder how they did until now to not have an internal technical office... but also just to do the executives, not to pen them... because the company is florida, bill a lot and recently inaugurated a new plant...c is cinematic, but it's mostly printed and welded sheet that hasn't requested until now a design team.

 

[meccanicamg]

Well, I think you're wrong, mechanical mg... even if I wonder how they did until now to not have an internal technical office... but also just to do the executives, not to pen them... because the company is florida, bill a lot and recently inaugurated a new plant...c is cinematic, but it's mostly printed and welded sheet that hasn't requested until now a design team.

Yet something does not come back because a thriving company invests and does not have internal design or makes a product easily reproducible by anyone or the risk of not having the heart of the product could be a big risk.... maybe because it has always gone well....like in many companies.
It is not conceivable in 2020....in theory the crisis had to have purified the companies that on were really structured to face the jump of quality....boh mystery.

 

[genesis1975]

but at least the functions of the parts going to solidedge are maintained?

 

[stevie]

Yet something does not come back because a thriving company invests and does not have internal design or makes a product easily reproducible by anyone or the risk of not having the heart of the product could be a big risk.... maybe because it has always gone well....like in many companies.
It is not conceivable in 2020....in theory the crisis had to have purified the companies that on were really structured to face the jump of quality....boh mystery.

true to a certain point... design in many sectors counts for 15-20% on business success.
the predominant part makes the production and especially the commercial part.

 

[stefanobruno]

but at least the functions of the parts going to solidedge are maintained?

between different cads, nothing passes that are not the volumes of the objects, no constraints and no tree of the workings, no reuse of parameters and placed on the table.
the worst thing that one can do is change the system, unless what has been used so far is a real bowl or archive is easily recreated, redesigning, however, everything from the top.
you can also recover the volume and remake only the puts on the table, but it is not a serious thing, if you have a parametric you have to use it, exploiting its merits.

 

[genesis1975]

and think that the person who recommended if he said that the last version includes a quick recognition of the couplings of the assemblies and that is very fast the passage.. .

 

[cacciatorino]

and think that the person who recommended if he said that the last version includes a quick recognition of the couplings of the assemblies and that is very fast the passage.. .

do a test, request the demonstration license on the siemens website and download the cad. Consider that many comments that you read on the forum could be related to personal experiences made on outdated versions of the software. For example, I have never used solid edge 2019 and 2020, so I don't know the new functions, among which might well be the one indicated by your interlocutor.

 

[genesis1975]

back to the charge...I had to decide the software...it would have been decided... not without having asked you first.... now since they acquired another company, which uses inventor, I have to choose between the three: if, sw, or inventor... Whichever choice makes someone displeased....what is the best of the three,qualitatively, in their latest versions?

 

[Stan9411]

Forgive me, but it's a pointless question. Everyone's fine.

is history becoming absurd anyway ... even here: have you acquired the other company? will they have to adapt or not? there is something that does not return to your corporate organization. . because if the big design work was done by you in person, you wouldn't dream of changing.

 

[meccanicamg]

back to the charge...I had to decide the software...it would have been decided... not without having asked you first.... now since they acquired another company, which uses inventor, I have to choose between the three: if, sw, or inventor... Whichever choice makes someone displeased....what is the best of the three,qualitatively, in their latest versions?

better catch.
but what pizza is history... buy... but... where is the know-how?
from the piasè enough jugà to fà el padron

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

given your previous questions from which you call a lack of mastery of solidworks, I think you can choose one of 3 indifferently as long as you impose the obligation of a course of the chosen cad

between the other in This post write that you used solid edge, so you know it.
summing up:
start post ask if solid edge is better, but in the past, as you asserted, you used solidedge
We can deduce that:
a you used solidedge to make 4 lines as if it were autocad and therefore you do not know
b you're fucking with us

 

[genesis1975]

The right option is the one to, because it's not in my nature to make fun of anyone..However I got tired of this thing... let's make you

 

[cacciatorino]

The right option is the one to, because it's not in my nature to make fun of anyone..However I got tired of this thing... let's make you

draw the coin, you will be able to design equally well with each of the three.

 

[genesis1975]

draw the coin, you will be able to design equally well with each of the three.

in fact

 

[meccanicamg]

a bi bone lemon drop.... orange goccia oh che mal di pancia... .
However, they are stories of a few companies that join each other, each using a different cad, they try to make a unique cad, a unique pdm.... years of casino..... melt the cad....via pdm... but the money still divides. not new history.