import file step

[massimo78]

Good evening, everyone.

importing a step file, I have the problem that those who left were equal subgroups are renamed into subgroups with different suffix.
I am sure that in the starting file the subgroups were unique because the original files were created by me with creo.

Am I wrong with any wrong approach in importing?
I feel like I've tried every possible combination.
thanks to all

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

Am I wrong with any wrong approach in importing?

I doubt, but surely if you don't say what they are or put a screenshot nobody can know.

 

[massimo78]

Meanwhile thank you for the answer.
as explained I tried all the settings, however I put the last ones I have.and what I get is this:It would be the same subgroup but that af10/af11 makes me different.

I forgot to specify that I tried to open the step with e-drawings and it works perfectly.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

Then:
active removers3d interconnect; you need to keep the solidworks file connected with the native file, so you need it when you expect to edit the native file and you want these changes to be transposed by solidworks without having to reload the file again and lose all the previous work. this option has no utility with the step files. It's a topic that comes out whenever anyone who has just started with solid imports a file because it's a default "flaggata" option.
remove the check to execute import diagnostics; It is not important in your case, but diagnostics serves to do it when the imported file has some problem, such as a solid that should only be solid also has surfaces, then you do the diagnostic that tries to fix the solid. is an option that is best to do only when necessary to save time and resources of the pc.
above sails also for the next voice.

everything else has no relevance except the mapping of the structure: solid has the peculiarity of managing multibody parts (even quresto already treated in the forum, but you also find it in the online guide and in the tutorials I hope you did) that maybe it is its ace in the sleeve.
the fact that almost all other cads do not have this peculiarity could, I repeat could, create problems; so in practice the only options you should change is this.

but first of all, check it out at 3dinrterconnect and return to import the file that may be resolved already so.

 

[massimo78]

all settings already tested (and try again now).
Nothing.
I noticed that the difference could be caused by a file derived from a family table.
below the photo of the components the subgroup:But then I noticed that the screws don't give the same problem, so I don't think it can depend on that.I will continue to try a little more, then I will surrender and begin to replace excess subaxis with that base, at least I will have only one.

As for the 3d interconnect I had already read all posts that are there about it.
Thanks again for losing some time on Saturday evening.

 

[cacciatorino]

excuse use creo direct/modeling or creo parametric? If you use modeling I think the bug is export side, if you use parametric I have no idea why I never used it.

 

[massimo78]

excuse use creo direct/modeling or creo parametric? If you use modeling I think the bug is export side, if you use parametric I have no idea why I never used it.

I create parametric.
but the thing I just don't understand is because on e-drawings is perfect and on solidworks no