incorrect repetition with correct quota ...

[reggio]

Hello, I should make a snake-shaped tondino "s",
I have created the first part and now I must only repeat,
... but the repetition does not repeat with the indicated measure... why?

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

tomorrow I'll take a look, in the meantime a couple of questions:
Why do you have to do the serpentine with the repetition of a bit of it?
What kind of repetition is it? How is it managed?
What indicates the red line and the arrow?
the first two bodies on the right do not match, they are obviously different bodies, why do they not match?

 

[LaboratorioDieci]

I don't train the magazine because I have 2020.

I found two stands: sketch 1 is not symmetric, so the inclination of the branches is different
in the repetition you selected the features and not the bodies cut, as you see below

 

[reggio]

ciao massi

Why do you have to do the serpentine with the repetition of a bit of it?

I have to reach a length of 800mm in step of 4.5mm and I wanted to avoid squeezing and quotating each brush ... do you have another method?

What kind of repetition is it? How is it managed?

linear repetition, based on an axis edge that I would hide

What indicates the red line and the arrow?
the first two bodies on the right do not match, they are obviously different bodies, why do they not match?

Red line indicates where the repetition should be...
do not match even if the distance is 4.5mm and the repetition is 4.5mm ... o_o

 

[reggio]

I found two stands: sketch 1 is not symmetric, so the inclination of the branches is different
in the repetition you selected the features and not the bodies cut, as you see below

hi, I see ... in fact it is not symmetrical ... but it was designed symmetric ... and in fact also defined with the points all aligned and lengths identical strokes...
Do you understand what happened?

I'm throwing everything and trying to do it again.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

the body to be repeated is by chance the green one, partially hidden?
I don't understand what the part that is in orange.. .

Can you just put the measurements on the part to repeat that I try to throw something down?

 

[reggio]

the body to be repeated is by chance the green one, partially hidden?
I don't understand what the part that is in orange.. .

Can you just put the measurements on the part to repeat that I try to throw something down?

What the hell is the orange? Why is he there??? ? ? ?
you must repeat the green
now I refer for the 3rd time because it is necessary to create at least 5 "up and down" or when fitting, the lengths lines change and, having indicated as the same, the ones not radiated vary measurement ....
I'll tell you what.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

What the hell is the orange? Why is he there??? ? ? ?

I feel like another body.

in the repetition you selected the features and not the bodies cut, as you see below

with the repetition bodies then you have to do the matching bodies that should be about 180...

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

flying.
version with body repetition + match
function repeat version

 

[LaboratorioDieci]

hi, I see ... in fact it is not symmetrical ... but it was designed symmetric ... and in fact also defined with the points all aligned and lengths identical strokes...
Do you understand what happened?

I'm throwing everything and trying to do it again.

the problem of the sketch is in the horizontal bond of the left end, which is not correct, and lacks parallelism as you did with the sides in the other direction

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

that excrescence you see, orange, is because you repeated the sweep function.
this does not include the next cut; However, you can't include the cutting function in the repetition because this would propague on a body other than the initial one.
repeating the body these does not match because the cut you made does not have the ends on the same floor as you see from the image

basically the wrong repetition is due to errors of definition of sketches

 

[reggio]

:
I have re-ri-ri-ri done
look example of boulders (which I cannot repeat to get a snake copy to 4,8mm to create 1 mesh of this "chain" )

My attached sketches are correct (but sw says ultra vicolati ...) gives equally graphic error (but if the sketch is now ok ... why does it repeat badly????????) and then ... does not allow me to get a snake copy to 4,8mm ... grrrrrrrrrrrr

... and think that this is the easy part .. I think about when I will have to wrap the other wire crushed spiral metals...

alternatives/ideas? :

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

the problem of the other bonding is given by that intersection you see in the image

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

However you can't repeat the function if you break it with a cut after the sweep for the reason I told you in post #11.
do as I did in my example, put breakpoints to the sweep sketch and convert uninterested lines to 4.5 (or 4.8) into construction lines.
or repeat the body to which it will follow the match function

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

The key error is not the intersection, although deleting it solves the sketch but fading the geometry, but the relationship of equality between the first line to the right and the second that cannot be equal.
eliminates both equality constraints on the right line and the sketch is resolved correctly

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

@reggio So you fixed it?

 

[reggio]

@reggio So you fixed it?

but weighs like beast.
realistic but unusable ufff...
now it is to simplify ...

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

Ma weighs the beast

And what did you expect? Maybe if you turn it into a body without history you get something.
What is the purpose?
Why not use a graphic plot

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

an example made with aspects

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

attach the video that inspired me

SOLIDWORKS PhotoView 360 Surface Finish Overview

One of the most underutilized feature sets of PhotoView 360 Surface Finish tab. Why is it underutilized? It’s found in the appearance advanced settings that some users may never activate. Most users don’t fully understand the settings and controls found there or how they can be used.

www.javelin-tech.com

even if the topic is rendering with photoview360 the basis for the use of aspects is also good for normal graphic representation