industrial 2.0 -3.0 -4.0 -5.0

[infallibile_GF]

What do they mean? For me they don't make any sense, they are indices invented by marketing men to take subsidies and incentives, but in the practice that it means?
what differs in industry 3.0, from 2.0? And the 5.0 that's the last one?
For me it's just a cooler stuff, who shoots the highest number.
or any new index, employees may be dismissed, which are replaced by technology. i.e. with industry 2.0 you can fire 20% of your employees, but if you go to 4.0, you can fire 40%.
you will see that the first who will talk about industry 6.0 will be the coolest of all, the coolest, the most trendy and will have millions of likes on social media.
I almost put myself to talk about industry 6.0, indeed no! I go directly to the 7.0! that would be the industry without employees, nor workers, where the product must manufacture directly the customer, you give him only a vague idea, but you pay it at full price.

 

[New Rider]

Perché si dice 4.0 e che cosa vuol dire 1.0, 2.0 e 3.0?

4.0 è un termine che si riferisce alla Quarta Rivoluzione Industriale, che ha portato alle fabbriche automatizzate e a una produzione caratterizzata da utilizzo dei dati, interazione uomo-macchina e costanti passaggi tra digitale e reale. Ecco anche i significati di 1.0, 2.0 e 3.0

www.economyup.it

according to what you say you deserve to go away with the wheels of stone or wood pulled by horses

 

[infallibile_GF]

I am not in agreement with those classifications, because it started to talk about industry 2.0 with the advent of the internet and it has nothing to do with mass production, then 3.0 not if it has spun nobody and jumped directly to 4.0.

 

[ragnol]

that the numeral is declined also in the field of "marketing" there is no doubt (for example, machines or technologies proposed/sold as industry 2.0 etc.), but it is subordinated to a classification that is based on specific criteria, easily recoverable on the net, as @new rider he highlighted.

as always, practice then you can differ from theory. for my modest experience, I have seen companies receive substantial contributions for the purchase of the single machine maybe 2.0 (central compared to the production), when all the contour was from low-family company ( warehouse management based on excel sheets that every two weeks required a "live" verification, management orders/orders/other present only in the head of the owner, etc. etc.).

 

[stevie]

that often everything has reduced to a mere commercial and marketing find there is no doubt...

 

[gerod]

from 4.0 it has passed to the temine "transition".
then transition 4.0 and 5.0.
What does that really mean? in low economic terms or economic benefits for companies.
The inventor? many think of the book "the fourth industrial revolution" of schwab :-(
surely these indices (from 4 to 5 in a few years) were coined by someone powerful and then all behind... power of the economy.
what matters is that companies that make investments believe us and put into the field the best technology possible remembering that man is necessary to make the machines work, even if they are evolved.
5.0 in Italy is associated with machines 4.0 and consumption reduction (called in poor words). therefore not enough a machine that has the criteria of transition 4.0 but that is associated with an efficient energy.
Too bad that the 31.12.2025 will end all... maybe it will come 6.0 and so in a few years we will lose among the indices.
Hi.