info software modeling design objects

[Paky]

Hello everyone,
Thank you in advance for your safe and friendly answers.
here is my question ....................... provided that I have a good familiarity with 3d autocad (not as much as it serves in this case), I need to take a 3d modeler to achieve realistically, metrically controllable and cantierable, design objects of all kinds: for example tables, chairs, toilets, washbasins, chandeliers, forks, knives, pens, mirrors, sofas....... in short all that is furniture.
I would like to get a good result without spending too much.
What do you recommend?

 

[enri]

rhinceros without doubt.

 

[Paky]

Thank you.
Tell me, what features does it have? some have suggested me rhino or proe: what has in + rhinceros regarding these 2?
thank you 1000...... .

 

[Paky]

....... forse intendevi rhinoceros?

 

[Tristan]

....... forse intendevi rhinoceros?

I think so.

 

[marcof]

Hello everyone,
Thank you in advance for your safe and friendly answers.
here is my question ....................... provided that I have a good familiarity with 3d autocad (not as much as it serves in this case), I need to take a 3d modeler to realize in a realistic, metrically controllable and cantierable, design objects of all kinds

rhinceros without doubt.

if by cantierable means everything that concerns the industrial production of that object (tables 2d, distinct, management of assemblies etc.) iho rhino as the only choice I would let him lose, although I understand that costs little...

 

[MarcoBi]

rhinceros without doubt.

100% quoto.
the difference with pro-e is huge, in terms of cost and also of learning/use.
in any case, without wanting to open the usual discussions about what is best, what does this or that other sw, I would say that the only price comparison can, to start making the difference.

 

[maxopus]

none of you have asked the user the most important question.
good reasoning, what costs less is what is best, congratulations.

 

[MBT]

And the question is? ?
(Let's see if I guess... "what must be your final result? plates, rendering or what?" )

 

[maxopus]

Thank you.
Tell me, what features does it have? some have suggested me rhino or proe: what has in + rhinceros regarding these 2?
thank you 1000...... .

rhino has nothing more than creo (ex pro/e).
rhino is a nurbs modeler, creo is a product development suite and costs at least 5 times rhino.
Obviously if you have to put a person to work every day, you better create, because the productivity of the system is incomparable.
If you do it two weeks a year of work, take rhino, with all its limits.

 

[maxopus]

And the question is? ?
(Let's see if I guess... "what must be your final result? plates, rendering or what?" )

If you work on it every day, I'll make you work on it two days a month.
because the productivity of creo is many times higher in the vast majority of cases.
If you have the job you want to see that you don't find 5000 euros for the investment?

 

[Paky]

Thank you all . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
by cantierable I mean that what project, if accepted by the customer (then the modeler must allow me to realize 3d realistic), passes to production (so tables 2d etc etc.).
how much do I have to use it? I have no idea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I suppose the time needed to design more or less 30/40 furniture elements.
from what I have understood I think that the correct choice is rhino because, making comparison with I create, I think that the latter costs a little too much (considering that I still do not know how much time I will spend on) ............................................................... are you agree with me?
another question (sorry ignorance) but ....rhinoceros, imho rhino and rhino, are the same? ?

 

[Tristan]

from what I have understood I think that the correct choice is rhino because, making comparison with I create, I think that the latter costs a little too much (considering that I still do not know how much time I will spend on) ............................................................... are you agree with me?

not necessarily.

another question (sorry ignorance) but ....rhinoceros, imho rhino and rhino, are the same? ?

Yes, he is always

 

[MBT]

I throw a rock in the pond... to confuse the waters.
If you don't know how much to use it, if you don't know what to do, if you don't want to spend money... Prenti blender.. .
is free;-) and does "more or less" as rhino
of the rest, rhino does "more or less" as creo

provocations aside.... rhino, for what little I know, costs little but does his job.
I create, always knowing it little, costs more but allows to do many more things.
if your purpose is to work little and then bho... then ok to rhino
If you think you need to do more things for a long time, you value more...

 

[enri]

It's obvious that it only deals with non-production design, so I create it seems exaggerated, as much as I can do all the same. the only one is that rhinoeros in the table does not excel, you will have two-room support cad to draw, or create tables a little more flexible, however you can do the same.
but excuse the time involved, will be the purpose and object of use the important aspect not?

 

[Tequila]

but excuse the time involved, will be the purpose and object of use the important aspect not?

is true in part... at the end of the day, it could also download sketchups that are free as a blender or use some cads for didactic use and then export work to dwg/step etc.

 

[Paky]

...... I am heading towards rhino maybe, as you recommended, supporting me with autocad for the table.
Tell me something, rhino and autocad interface well?
Does rhino work in dwg? If you don't work in dwg, do you read it?
would I have difficulty importing/exposing from one to another programme (2d and 3d) ?

 

[maxopus]

It's obvious that it only deals with non-production design, so I create it seems exaggerated, as much as I can do all the same. the only one is that rhinoeros in the table does not excel, you will have two-room support cad to draw, or create tables a little more flexible, however you can do the same.
but excuse the time involved, will be the purpose and object of use the important aspect not?

Why don't you design it for production?
I plan for production, even if I do not produce.
It's about time.
If you use 1800 hours a year, would you be interested or not have a more productive instrument?
if instead it takes 100 hours a year the weight of the operation is completely different.
If you need to develop sheet metal, make a separate material, draw a tube as you owe for laser tube (all things planned in the industry) it is better to have rhino or a cad real?
If you have to change the radii and position of the holes or change a series is better rhino or a cad, right?

so if buying rhino saves 4000 euros but you eat them in 3 months for a lower productivity than who has to make product development ...

If I had to recommend a cheap cad I would stay within the mcad and prefer a product like spaceclaim.

 

[Paky]

...... I am heading towards rhino maybe, as you recommended, supporting me with autocad for the table.
Tell me something, rhino and autocad interface well?
Does rhino work in dwg? If you don't work in dwg, do you read it?
would I have difficulty importing/exposing from one to another programme (2d and 3d) ?

 

[marcof]

...... I am heading towards rhino maybe, as you recommended, supporting me with autocad for the table.

I'm rather than doing a job like that. . .
working in 3d with a cad and export to another cad 2d to make the tables is, nowadays and imho, a madness... a total delusion.

make a change to model 3d because the customer asks you and what do you do, reimport everything and do it again from scratch on the 2d?
already use rhino for me would be frustrating since in the modifications it simply compels you to remake the geometries because the profiles are not associated with the surfaces that have generated. to use it together with autocad I repeat that it is like to put on the cilicon instead of a linen shirt...