There are only 2 extra extrusions of the expected hypothetical. the mirror, the holes, the main extrusion there are always and anyway. It doesn't seem to me to weigh anything down unless you're working with a 4mb ram commodore 64 acon:biggrin:you too have done so xro like you, we give you some you (or even of the you ), I will understand that there are a lot of operations, you have to create the 2 extrusions in which they go to weigh a little if then you have to go together.with the empty unique command wouldn't be bad, only that opens all the geometry. .
I forgot that the extrusion cut is distorted as obvious that it is 2nd.. the game with the deformation changesI couldn't do it either. I found one of the possible solutions and it works.
procedure. the "special" command is the cut extruded to the surface of the hole.
to note that I did half a piece and I broke the whole body, since the functions are not allowed to mirror because particular. depends on the procedure. However you can.
If I have apito well I have to create surfaces that such as that of the vertical hole gives me an arrival..The problem is that the extruded cut always considers a surface and never + of one..I should create it + of one according to the number of holes or one that encloses all the offsets of the holes and the max emptying distance.. how do I create this strange superfic surface?I give you 3 possible scenarios:
1) you do a sketch on paper of what you want to get and then start with modeling.
This prevents you from going into the trumpet with cubes to work and add material, creating a non-smart shaped part.
2) do remote offset surfaces that may vary to create excavation tools.
3) the method that suggested you 'mecca' that I personally do not recommend, for the reason indicated in point 1.
Every piece has its own history. designing it must have an engineering/functional sense. It always depends on what you want. but the drunk wife and the full bang is not possible.I forgot that the extrusion cut is distorted as obvious that it is 2nd.. the game with the deformation changes:smile:
I see from the photos that the vertical hole thickening is also under es and one only wants it on top?
I, without removing anything from nx, used your method with + feature, not yet very experienced with mirrors:biggrin: ,but I think it is not correct,that is, in the sense that if I had to do it again, I would not do it again with me I did before, too much decision-making is not good (all the 3d maybe reason like this) cmq because I do not feel the only to have problems of this type, maybe because I do not know the surfaces wellEvery piece has its own history. designing it must have an engineering/functional sense. It always depends on what you want. but the drunk wife and the full bang is not possible.
any type of modeling leads to having more feautures. Soliduser gave you other approaches. everything is in what to do first and what to do next, have the possibility to change or not feautures at will. You can also create negatives to subtract to full... there are a thousand ways. no way done by single command.
It can be. I did not understand which longitudinal hole but the big one from below I did not make the smaller hole since it did not understand and therefore there is only the big one. all holes are passing except what I just described earlier.I, without removing anything from nx, used your method with + feature, not yet very experienced with mirrors:biggrin: ,but I think it is not correct,that is, in the sense that if I had to do it again, I would not do it again with me I did before, too much decision-making is not good (all the 3d maybe reason like this) cmq because I do not feel the only to have problems of this type, maybe because I do not know the surfaces well
..in your image I see that the longitudinal hole is full and therefore you had to create a cut this because sometimes when you tell it up to the surface and the sketch does not fall right above it goes into trouble..corregimi if I am mistaken. .
Now I understand... even below it lacks a piece of material. Of course, it's prprious.the hole in fuxia is the farthestudinal one is passing..the deduction is the blind hole in axis with the zone "open"