• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

info

  • Thread starter Thread starter solokite
  • Start date Start date

solokite

Guest
hi guys, I already have the monoblock with all the holes, how do I create the food? I have to use the command empty? I'm scrambling and I know that the solution is easy:( thanks
 

Attachments

  • 2_1 (3).webp
    2_1 (3).webp
    237.2 KB · Views: 27
What monoblock? which, where and how lightening?

a little clarity, please. .

greetings
Marco:smile:
 
I have the piece with 2 true holes and the two horizontal holes; I have to create the 2 quarries that determine the 2 emptinesses; assuming that is a piece that I have imported and is the finished result. I want to create one knowing how to do it.
 

Attachments

  • Parte17.webp
    Parte17.webp
    130 KB · Views: 5
I couldn't do it either. I found one of the possible solutions and it works.

procedure. the "special" command is the cut extruded to the surface of the hole.

to note that I did half a piece and I broke the whole body, since the functions are not allowed to mirror because particular. depends on the procedure. However you can.
 

Attachments

  • 1a.webp
    1a.webp
    141.2 KB · Views: 13
  • 1b.webp
    1b.webp
    49.8 KB · Views: 12
  • 1c.webp
    1c.webp
    59.9 KB · Views: 13
  • finito.webp
    finito.webp
    90.4 KB · Views: 15
you too have done so xro like you, we give you some you (or even of the you ), I will understand that there are a lot of operations, you have to create the 2 extrusions in which they go to weigh a little if then you have to go together.with the empty unique command wouldn't be bad, only that opens all the geometry. .
 
you too have done so xro like you, we give you some you (or even of the you ), I will understand that there are a lot of operations, you have to create the 2 extrusions in which they go to weigh a little if then you have to go together.with the empty unique command wouldn't be bad, only that opens all the geometry. .
There are only 2 extra extrusions of the expected hypothetical. the mirror, the holes, the main extrusion there are always and anyway. It doesn't seem to me to weigh anything down unless you're working with a 4mb ram commodore 64 acon:biggrin:

when you work with axes from 5000 occasions + all the bolting and 7gb of ram allocate for having loaded the axieme of 200mb we tell of "weight" of the geometry :finger:

for the representation of together you can also make a full configuration or as you like, use light weight, speedpacks.

ps: If you do a save by name the file becomes smaller and overwrite the original.
 
I give you 3 possible scenarios:
1) you do a sketch on paper of what you want to get and then start with modeling.
This prevents you from going into the trumpet with cubes to work and add material, creating a non-smart shaped part.
2) do remote offset surfaces that may vary to create excavation tools.
3) the method that suggested you 'mecca' that I personally do not recommend, for the reason indicated in point 1.
 
I might have 7 gb of ram..adesso I try to complicate the story because at first it was not seen but there is also a hole below; also I like you mecca I have added extrusions on extrusions but I do not want it to climb on the weight of the geometry..the piece I forgot to show has a third hole that cme is seen in the finished purple piece has a right inspection to go
you have done up to the hole rightly.. but if you have 2 of different diameter which you choose and cmq sw in my opinion it does not help because you have to go if you pre-stamps tied to pre-resistant geometries.
really times before drawing I have to plan the steps and it is a waste of time
 

Attachments

  • Parte2.webp
    Parte2.webp
    63.8 KB · Views: 4
I couldn't do it either. I found one of the possible solutions and it works.

procedure. the "special" command is the cut extruded to the surface of the hole.

to note that I did half a piece and I broke the whole body, since the functions are not allowed to mirror because particular. depends on the procedure. However you can.
I forgot that the extrusion cut is distorted as obvious that it is 2nd.. the game with the deformation changes;):smile:
I see from the photos that the vertical hole thickening is also under es and one only wants it on top?
 
I give you 3 possible scenarios:
1) you do a sketch on paper of what you want to get and then start with modeling.
This prevents you from going into the trumpet with cubes to work and add material, creating a non-smart shaped part.
2) do remote offset surfaces that may vary to create excavation tools.
3) the method that suggested you 'mecca' that I personally do not recommend, for the reason indicated in point 1.
If I have apito well I have to create surfaces that such as that of the vertical hole gives me an arrival..The problem is that the extruded cut always considers a surface and never + of one..I should create it + of one according to the number of holes or one that encloses all the offsets of the holes and the max emptying distance.. how do I create this strange superfic surface?
 
I forgot that the extrusion cut is distorted as obvious that it is 2nd.. the game with the deformation changes;):smile:
I see from the photos that the vertical hole thickening is also under es and one only wants it on top?
Every piece has its own history. designing it must have an engineering/functional sense. It always depends on what you want. but the drunk wife and the full bang is not possible.

any type of modeling leads to having more feautures. Soliduser gave you other approaches. everything is in what to do first and what to do next, have the possibility to change or not feautures at will. You can also create negatives to subtract to full... there are a thousand ways. no way done by single command.
 
Every piece has its own history. designing it must have an engineering/functional sense. It always depends on what you want. but the drunk wife and the full bang is not possible.

any type of modeling leads to having more feautures. Soliduser gave you other approaches. everything is in what to do first and what to do next, have the possibility to change or not feautures at will. You can also create negatives to subtract to full... there are a thousand ways. no way done by single command.
I, without removing anything from nx, used your method with + feature, not yet very experienced with mirrors:biggrin: ,but I think it is not correct,that is, in the sense that if I had to do it again, I would not do it again with me I did before, too much decision-making is not good (all the 3d maybe reason like this) cmq because I do not feel the only to have problems of this type, maybe because I do not know the surfaces well

..in your image I see that the longitudinal hole is full and therefore you had to create a cut this because sometimes when you tell it up to the surface and the sketch does not fall right above it goes into trouble..corregimi if I am mistaken. .
 
I, without removing anything from nx, used your method with + feature, not yet very experienced with mirrors:biggrin: ,but I think it is not correct,that is, in the sense that if I had to do it again, I would not do it again with me I did before, too much decision-making is not good (all the 3d maybe reason like this) cmq because I do not feel the only to have problems of this type, maybe because I do not know the surfaces well

..in your image I see that the longitudinal hole is full and therefore you had to create a cut this because sometimes when you tell it up to the surface and the sketch does not fall right above it goes into trouble..corregimi if I am mistaken. .
It can be. I did not understand which longitudinal hole but the big one from below I did not make the smaller hole since it did not understand and therefore there is only the big one. all holes are passing except what I just described earlier.

You have to ask soliduser. I make plant modeling he instead has more practice on product modeling, so he uses tools that I don't need but serve you
 
the hole in fuxia is the farthestudinal one is passing..the deduction is the blind hole in axis with the zone "open"
 
in that case the cut and extrusion must be done without deformed and then add the deformed function.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top