intruder tolerance on design

[sampom]

I'm sorry, but I disagree.
tolerances must be placed compared to the nominal quota
I imagine, being tolerated, that at that quota you associate another on another piece
I hope it is from trade (8.9 is not exactly a measure from Italians, it seems to me to be 0.35 ") but the nominal share is that and on that must move tolerance
If I checked the drawings tomorrow, I would check the nominal odds and expect to find 8.9 on both designs. if instead on one I find 8.9 and on the other 9 .... I send the first alarm signals!:angry:

instead I agree with you:biggrin: and I thought of avelro made understand in my message not having provided "absolute" opinions but possible, according to the type of object under consideration.
Obviously the nominal quota is "regina" but I should see the design/piece to understand, as you rightly say, what is the nominal quota and why it should be so.. and see the coupling, because so many times I see tolerances of the cacchio (and even nominal quotas) put so, so much for, on pieces that remain free solos in the air:smile:

In the end, I think we all say the same thing. It is the question that with only numbers put so, it was not sufficiently explanatory.

greetings
Marco:smile:

 

[SHIREN]

Hello everyone
I say mine
apart from the reference was for a more or less crushed pipe
I read about "perception" of the quota
the perception should be " +0.20 " in fact practical is the same thing but it tends to convey to the operator a different importance

also applies to the speech of friends sampson and mecc
in fact listing the same values in different ways
you try to keep the operator's attention more or less high

that knows very well who works in the daily newspaper on certain probes,
Thank you very much